I found a rather unusual tract on the American Enterprise Institute website: "Choosing Victory - A Plan For Success In Iraq" It reads like the Bush Administration current line of thinking. It looks like this is where Bush got the "surge" plan; I have read elsewhere that AEI has 20 consultants working for the Bush Admin. Not surprising, as Mobil/Exxon, one of the primary contributors to AEI, was probably one of the primary promoters of the Iraq war in the first place (it wasn't initially called Operation Iraq Liberation - OIL - for nothing), the company is the primary beneficiary of the fields, I believe, and they certainly don't want to abandon them now. I guess we should follow the AEI website to see where the pres is going... Interim report: http://www.aei.org/publications/pubID.25292/pub_detail.asp Full-length PDF http://www.aei.org/docLib/20070111_ChoosingVictoryupdated.pdf Choosing Victory Print Mail A Plan for Success in Iraq By Frederick W. Kagan Posted: Thursday, December 14, 2006 PAPERS AND STUDIES AEI Online Publication Date: December 14, 2006 Click here to view this interim report as an Adobe Acrobat PDF. Executive Summary a.. Victory is still an option in Iraq. America, a country of 300 million people with a GDP of $12 trillion, and more than 1 million soldiers and marines can regain control of Iraq, a state the size of California with a population of 25 million and a GDP under $100 billion. Victory in Iraq is vital to America's security. Defeat will lead to regional conflict, humanitarian catastrophe, and increased global terrorism. Iraq has reached a critical point. The strategy of relying on a political process to eliminate the insurgency has failed. Rising sectarian violence threatens to break America's will to fight. This violence will destroy the Iraqi government, armed forces, and people if it is not rapidly controlled. Victory in Iraq is still possible at an acceptable level of effort. We must adopt a new approach to the war and implement it quickly and decisively. Three courses of action have been proposed. All will fail. a.. Withdraw immediately. This approach will lead to immediate defeat. The Iraqi Security Forces are entirely dependent upon American support to survive and function. If U.S. forces withdraw now, they will collapse and Iraq will descend into total civil war that will rapidly spread throughout the region. b.. Engage Iraq's neighbors. This approach will fail. The basic causes of violence and sources of manpower and resources for the warring sides come from within Iraq. Iraq's neighbors are encouraging the violence, but they cannot stop it. c.. Increase embedded trainers dramatically. This approach cannot succeed rapidly enough to prevent defeat. Removing U.S. forces from patrolling neighborhoods to embed them as trainers will lead to an immediate rise in violence. This rise in violence will destroy America's remaining will to fight, and escalate the cycle of sectarian violence in Iraq beyond anything an Iraqi army could bring under control. We must act now to restore security and stability to Baghdad. We and the enemy have identified it as the decisive point. There is a way to do this. a.. We must change our focus from training Iraqi soldiers to securing the Iraqi population and containing the rising violence. Securing the population has never been the primary mission of the U.S. military effort in Iraq, and now it must become the first priority. b.. We must send more American combat forces into Iraq and especially into Baghdad to support this operation. A surge of seven Army brigades and Marine regiments to support clear-and-hold operations starting in the spring of 2007 is necessary, possible, and will be sufficient. c.. These forces, partnered with Iraqi units, will clear critical Sunni and mixed Sunni-Shi'a neighborhoods, primarily on the west side of the city. d.. After the neighborhoods have been cleared, U.S. soldiers and Marines, again partnered with Iraqis, will remain behind to maintain security. e.. As security is established, reconstruction aid will help to reestablish normal life and, working through Iraqi officials, will strengthen Iraqi local government. This approach requires a national commitment to victory in Iraq: a.. The ground forces must accept longer tours for several years. National Guard units will have to accept increased deployments during this period. b.. Equipment shortages must be overcome by transferring equipment from non-deploying active duty, National Guard, and reserve units to those about to deploy. Military industry must be mobilized to provide replacement equipment sets urgently. c.. The president must request a dramatic increase in reconstruction aid for Iraq. Responsibility and accountability for reconstruction must be assigned to established agencies. The president must insist upon the completion of reconstruction projects. The president should also request a dramatic increase in CERP funds. d.. The president must request a substantial increase in ground forces end strength. This increase is vital to sustaining the morale of the combat forces by ensuring that relief is on the way. The president must issue a personal call for young Americans to volunteer to fight in the decisive conflict of this age. Failure in Iraq today will require far greater sacrifices tomorrow in far more desperate circumstances. Committing to victory now will demonstrate America's strength to our friends and enemies around the world. Frederick W. Kagan is a resident scholar at AEI. Click here to view this interim report as an Adobe Acrobat PDF. Related Links Related event: "Choosing Victory: A Plan for Success in Iraq" Source Notes: This interim report was presented as a PowerPoint presentation at the event "Choosing Victory: A Plan for Success" at AEI on December 14, 2006. The full report will be issued in January 2007.