Print

Print


http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=38575

Wednesday, July 18, 2007   17:13 GMT

ENERGY:
Nuclear Power No Panacea, Critics Say

Haider Rizvi

UNITED NATIONS, Jul 17 (IPS) - The nuclear mishap caused by Monday's 
earthquake in Japan has unleashed another wave of environmental 
concerns about the use of nuclear technology to meet the world's 
energy needs.

"Nuclear power is hardly the safe panacea its supporters claim it to 
be," said Norman Dean of Friends of the Earth (FoE), a network of 
hundreds of environmental groups around the world.

Raising similar concerns, the environmental group Greenpeace 
International's Jan Beranek described the Kashiwazaki nuclear site 
incident as another "reminder" that nuclear power "is not safe".

Both Dean and Beranek warned of "far more serious nuclear accidents" 
and "real risks" posed by earthquakes and industrial disasters, as 
well as possible terrorist attacks in the future.

Monday's earthquake killed nine and wounded more than 1,000 people, 
in addition to causing a radioactive leak and fire at the world's 
largest nuclear-power producing plant.

Japan's energy officials have acknowledged that the 
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear plant leaked hundreds of gallons of water 
that was contaminated with radioactive waste.

However, they described the amount of radioactive waste mixed with 
water as "tiny," and said there had been "no significant change" in 
the sea water and that there was no effect on the environment.

Greenpeace accused Japanese officials of "lying" in their initial 
assessment of the impact of the fire -- in which they said there was 
no danger of radioactive leakage -- adding that the Japanese and 
global nuclear industries have been marred by a series of accidents 
and cover-ups.

According to environmentalists, there are many similarities between 
what happened in Japan and an incident at Germany's Krummel power 
plant last month, in which a fire broke out in the transformers 
building and damaged the reactor.

"In Germany, the industry first claimed that the fire had no impact 
on reactor safety," said Beranek, "[but] in realty the fire led to 
serious malfunctions that directly threatened the safety of the 
reactor."

Various agencies measured Monday's earthquake between 6.7 and 6.8 on 
the Richter scale.

The quake hit on Marine Day, an official holiday in Japan, when most 
people were inside their homes. The Japanese media reported that a 
series of smaller aftershocks are still going on.

On Monday, authorities said they had evacuated some 2,000 people 
whose homes had been completely destroyed by the quake.

Critics point out that this was not the first time the Japanese 
nuclear industry has tried to cover up a nuclear accident.

According to Beranek, for example, the Hokuriku utility did not 
inform the public or nuclear inspectors about a serious incident that 
took place at the Shika nuclear power plant, where a mechanical 
failure in 1999 led to an uncontrolled chain reaction.

In April 2006, there was a radioactive spill of 40 litres of liquid 
containing plutonium in the brand new reprocessing plant in 
Rokkasho-Mura, the group said, adding that in August 2004, a pipe was 
ruptured in the Mihama plant, which resulted in the death of five 
workers.

More famously, nuclear meltdowns occurred at Three Mile Island in the 
U.S. state of Pennsylvania in 1979 and in 1986 at the Chernobyl 
Nuclear Power Plant in the former Soviet Union. A recent Greenpeace 
report estimated that 270,000 cancers and 93,000 fatal cancers were 
caused by that disaster.

Greenpeace and many other environmental groups have repeatedly called 
for the United Nations, United States and other powerful nations to 
stop promoting nuclear technology as an alternative to fossil fuels.

In April 2006, some leading European politicians raised serious 
questions about the U.N.'s role in encouraging countries to acquire 
nuclear energy for non-military purposes.

Former environment ministers from European countries, including 
Russia, sent a letter to the former U.N. chief Kofi Annan urging him 
to reform the mandate of the International Atomic Energy Agency.

"Nuclear power is no longer necessary," they said in the letter. "We 
have now numerous renewable technologies available to guarantee the 
right to safe, clean, and cheap energy."

Greenpeace's Beranek echoed the same message Monday. "Nuclear power 
undermines real solutions to climate change, by diverting resources 
away from the massive development of clean energy sources the world 
urgently needs," he said.

"What's more," he added, "climate change will increase natural 
disasters, in turn posing a greater risk to nuclear power plants, and 
to our safety."

But this line of reasoning has failed to win over many of the world's 
most powerful nations. In July last year, when leaders of the world's 
most industrialised countries, known as the Group of Eight, gathered 
in St. Petersburg, Russia, they signed a joint statement saying that 
nuclear energy is one way to address climate change.

Many environmentalists see nuclear reactors as dangerous because in 
addition to natural disasters they are also vulnerable to 
unintentional human error.

"Energy conservation and wind and solar power are cleaner and safer 
than nuclear power," said Dean. "They are a better way to fight 
global warming."