Print

Print


Re: Cuba trip and AAAS session Yes!

And Michael Moore takes this red baiting issue on directly in “Sicko” in anticipation of the possibility that single payer national health insurance starts to gain significant support.  Such a movement will be red baited, so it is better to be upfront about it from the beginning.  Moore makes nice fun of the potential baiting and compares national health insurance to other types of “socialist” programs, e.g., public education.  Oh the horror! :)

Larry

On 7/2/07 7:39 AM, "Jonathan Campbell" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Re: openness: the same thing was true of the Communist Party of the US. During all the years that they were in the forefront of the labor movement in the US (their leaders were prominent in most of the militant unions), they kept their radical views secret, and the ruling class was able to use this to both decimate the CPUSA and severely weaken the unions during the anti-communist crusades of the early 50s (HUAC, McCarthy, the Rosenberg trial, etc.).

Jonathan

----- Original Message -----
 
From:  Dr. Science <mailto:[log in to unmask]>   
 
To: [log in to unmask]  
 
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 5:59 AM
 
Subject: Re: Cuba trip and AAAS  session
 

Friends,
      On Herb's post  regarding 1) Cuba; 2) a presence at a AAAS meeting and 3) rules for the SftP  listserv, a couple of remarks.

Please don't send suggested rules to me.  Someone else ought to step forward, perhaps you Herb. I don't want to be a  nexus for SftP communication or organization. If it's too much for you, Herb,  maybe someone else can do it.

On planning AAAS presence, you said, "We  should not identify ourselves as SftP or any other organization." My approach  to people is to be totally open, not to hide anything. I don't see SftP as any  kind of "disciplined" so-called vanguard group trying to worm our way into an  influential position in some other organization. If our sympathies are with  the radical left we ought to be open about it, in my opinion. There is really  nothing to hide.

I learned from Mitch Verter's recent biography of  Ricardo Flores Magon, the pre-eminent anarchist of the Mexican revolution,  that eventually he lost many comrades with much bitterness because he had  concealed from them part, probably the most radical part, of his dream for  Mexican society, fearful initially that his organizing efforts would be less  successful if he did not. My personal reaction is always one of great anger if  I later discover that I've been deceived by someone I trusted. I urge  openness.