Actually, that law was in place long before there was any per parcel payment. 

Mary Jane

 

 

From: Vermont Municipal Government Discussion Network [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Wendy
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 5:27 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Contiguous lots

 

Most likely.

 

Wendy L. Wilton

Rutland City Treasurer

802-773-1800

802-773-1809  fax

[log in to unmask]

 


From: Vermont Municipal Government Discussion Network [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Roberta Dana
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 3:37 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Contiguous lots

 

Mu understanding is that if the land is contiguous and is owned by the "exact" same person then it must be considered as one parcel.  Maybe this has a connection to the $$$ per parcel the state sends us to maintain the grand list????  Less parcels, less $$ the town receives.

 

Roberta Dana
Town Treasurer & Tax Collector
Groton, VT
802-584-3131
[log in to unmask]

----- Original Message -----

From: [log in to unmask]">Wendy

To: [log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]

Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 3:23 PM

Subject: Contiguous lots

 

Is there a state law that demands that adjacent lots, owned by the same person, must be condensed under one SPAN # for purposes of assessment and taxation?  Or is the discretion of the lister?

 

Wendy L. Wilton

Rutland City Treasurer

802-773-1800

802-773-1809  fax

[log in to unmask]