I do have emails into the Deb and Kathy, awaiting a reply.

The new budget is $50K less than the original proposed budget.

I continue to be amazed on a daily basis on how convoluted the statutes are.


-----Original Message-----
From: Nora Wilson <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Apr 28, 2008 10:00 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: School Budget Vote - Round 2 help please

Is it possible that the Board is presenting the same budget?  I think they can go to the voters three times with the same proposal, no revisions.   If that is what they are doing they might not need to give out any more info.  Maybe Deb could help.
----- Original Message -----
From: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">Jennifer Hanlon
To: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2008 8:23 AM
Subject: Re: School Budget Vote - Round 2 help please

Thank you for your replies so far!   So far this is what I know.

1) The warning for the special meeting for the revote was posted in a timely manner. I don't have a problem with that.

2) We vote on the total budget amount and no other special items.

3)  My questions lie with the revision to the budget between the first presentation which failed to pass, and this second modified budget the school board is presenting.  The question is "Shouldn't the voters be presented with a full breakdown of the budget expenditures, in writing, several days prior to the meeting/vote?"  How can we analyze and have time to comprehend the differences between the first budget and the second if we don't have the figures in front of us to see what was trimmed or moved where?     Aren't we entitled to have more than a few minutes to review the figures, listen to the school board presentation, and then vote on the most expensive part of our taxes?  How can we formulate intelligent questions without having adequate time to analyze the information?

Thanks again in advance for any insight into this.  I have scoured the education.vermont.gov website and can't find anything on there about it.   It seems to me that legal requirement or not, a complete budget report should be presented by the board prior to the meeting and vote as a matter of full disclosure and transparency and would be a "best practice" policy of the board, at minimum.

Jennifer Hanlon

-----Original Message-----
From: TownClerk Guildhall <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Apr 26, 2008 7:38 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: School Budget Vote - Round 2 help please

As a matter of course, aren't ALL special town and school district meetings required to be duly posted and for all budget figures and proposed warned articles to be distributed to the voters 10 days before, just like for regular Town Meeting?   When I get over to my office, I'm going to look at the statute myself!


On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Jennifer Hanlon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

We are voting as a town on the school budget again on Monday.  It failed to pass the first time.  However there is no new proposed budget that has been distributed to the voters yet.  I find it hard to believe that there is no requirement that the voters must have the new proposed budget within plenty of time prior to the vote so they can study it and make an intelligent decision.

Can someone please point me to the statute or any other directive pertaining to a revised school budget going back to the voters and any requirements that the voters have access to the figures prior to the meeting and vote?

Thanks a bunch, on a beautiful Friday afternoon!

Jennifer Hanlon
UTG Supervisor