Gardasil vaccine doubts grow
From the Los Angeles Times
Gardasil vaccine doubts grow
The safety and effectiveness of the HPV vaccine Gardasil as a
preventive cervical cancer treatment for girls are questioned in a
By Linda Marsa
Special to The Times
August 11, 2008
Sandra Levy wants to do everything she can to safeguard the health of
her 11-year-old daughter -- and that, of course, includes cancer
prevention. She has had her child inoculated with one shot of
Gardasil, the human papilloma virus vaccine that may prevent cervical
cancer. But now, she says, she has serious reservations about going
ahead with the next two injections of the course.
"It's very confusing, and we really don't know if it's 100%
safe," says Levy, of Long Beach. "I'm not against vaccines,
but I don't want to do anything that would harm my daughter."
Though most medical organizations strongly advocate using the HPV
vaccine, some doctors and parents, like Levy, are asking whether the
vaccine's benefits really outweigh its costs. They say they aren't
convinced that the expensive shots offer any more protection than
preventive measures already available -- principally, regular
screening via the Pap smear test.
A handful worry that blanket immunizations of the nation's adolescents
could backfire by lulling them into a false sense of security that
leads them to neglect regular screening. If that happened, vaccination
could eventually boost cervical cancer rates instead of lowering
In addition, because Gardasil protects only against the HPV strains
linked most strongly to cervical cancer, "we don't know if it
will make a difference in the ultimate rates of cancer," says
Abby Lippman, an epidemiologist at McGill University in Montreal who
has researched the HPV vaccine. "The jury is still out on how
much benefit we're actually going to get with this vaccine."
A report released in June stirred up more doubts. Although cause and
effect were not proved, the report listed serious events -- such as
seizures, spontaneous abortions and even deaths -- among teens,
preteens and young women who had earlier had Gardasil shots.
As a result, the decision -- to vaccinate or not? -- has become
controversial. Sorting through the pros and cons can be daunting for
Promoted on TV
Since its approval in June 2006, Gardasil has been promoted via TV ads
featuring girls jumping rope and chanting "One less, one less,"
a reference to the promise that they won't be another statistic. The
vaccine has been hailed by physicians' groups as a breakthrough that
could potentially eradicate cervical cancer in the U.S. within a
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommended
that girls get the required series of three doses (given over a
six-month period) at age 9 or older; the American Academy of
Pediatrics and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
recommended the same, with a starting age of 11 or later. (Because HPV
is normally spread by intimate contact, the vaccine is considered most
effective when given before the beginning of sexual activity. It will
not eradicate HPV if someone is already infected.)
Since 2006, about 8 million females in the U.S. have received at least
one shot of Gardasil, according to the vaccine's maker, Merck &
Co. of Whitehouse Station, N.J., which based these estimates on data
from government and private insurers. Of the 100 known strains of HPV,
about 30 cause cancer or genital warts. Two -- HPV-16 and HPV-18 --
are responsible for 70% of cervical cancers. Pre-market studies showed
that the vaccine is 90% to 100% effective in thwarting the
transmission of these two strains and two others, which are linked to
90% of genital warts.
The vaccine is expensive. It costs $360 for the series of three shots,
and administrative fees can add $100 or more. Though insurance
companies sometimes cover costs, the overall expense for vaccinating
the nations' teenagers could run into billions, a bill that will
affect taxpayers as the shots are given to recipients of government
health programs and health insurance premiums rise.
The price may not be worth it, says Dr. Karen Smith-McCune, an
obstetrician and gynecologist at the UC San Francisco School of
Medicine. Because it takes years for cervical cancer to develop, it is
easily preventable as long as HPV infection is detected early. Though
the cancer is common in developing countries and kills more than
280,000 women worldwide every year, it is much less of a health threat
in the U.S., she says, where 11,000 women are diagnosed with the
disease annually, and about 3,700 will die of it.
The comparatively low U.S. incidence of cervical cancer is due to one
of the public health system's triumphs: widespread use of Pap smears,
which detect abnormal cervical cells so they can be removed before
they turn into cancers. Adoption of the Pap test caused a reduction of
cervical cancer rates by 74% between 1955 and 1992, according to the
American Cancer Society. Rates continue to drop by 4% each year.
Smith-McCune and other critics of Gardasil also note that up to 90% of
HPV infections in adolescents clear up on their own -- meaning that
cervical cancer will not develop even in most women infected with the
most aggressive type of HPV. In other words, a woman's risk of
developing cervical cancer is already extremely low, and the immune
system normally makes short work of HPV without outside help.
Even if women get the vaccine, they still need to continue annual Pap
screenings because they could contract other cancer-causing HPV
strains that the vaccine does not fight.
"The crux of it is that we know how to prevent cervical
cancer," Smith-McCune says. "One of the key questions is
whether this huge outlay of money for the vaccine is a better strategy
than reaching out to the women who aren't getting Pap tests and
It is not yet proven that Gardasil actually prevents cervical cancer,
which can take a decade to develop after HPV infection, because tests
of the vaccine before the FDA greenlighted it didn't run long enough
to prove that conclusively. "Even though it guards against two
HPV strains, the other HPV types need to be taken into account,"
Smith-McCune says. "It will take a long time before we know the
true efficacy of the vaccine."
Even doctors who helped devise the vaccine point out that Pap
screening may be more effective in cutting cervical cancer rates.
"If we vaccinate every single 12-year-old, it should reduce by
half the number of cervical cancers in the next 35 years," says
Dr. Diane Harper, director of the Gynecologic Cancer Prevention
Research Group at Dartmouth Medical School in Hanover, N.H., and a
lead researcher in the development of the HPV vaccine. "With Pap
screening, we've reduced it by nearly 75%."
Then there is the issue of side effects. When the vaccine was tested
in more than 11,000 females age 9 to 26 before its FDA approval, no
serious ones emerged, though some subjects felt soreness at the
injection site and, in rare instances, fainted after the shot.
But an analysis released June 30 by the Washington, D.C.-based public
interest group Judicial Watch raised some red flags. Judicial Watch
obtained records from the FDA's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
(VAERS), a voluntary system used by doctors, patients and drug
companies to report side effects with vaccines to the federal agency.
The report revealed that since the vaccine's 2006 approval, when girls
began getting it, nearly 9,000 had bad health events after receiving
Gardasil. The incidents included 10 miscarriages, 78 severe outbreaks
of genital warts and six cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome, an
autoimmune disorder that can result in paralysis. There were also 18
Since the FDA's VAERS is known to catch perhaps 10% of adverse events
at best, according to a 2004 report in the New England Journal of
Medicine by the FDA, the actual numbers may be far higher.
It is difficult to prove whether the vaccine was the culprit behind
these side effects -- just because two events happen, it does not mean
that one caused the other, says Dr. Laurie E. Markowitz, an
epidemiologist at the CDC who has had her own daughter vaccinated. The
deaths, and all the other serious events, could have happened in the
absence of the vaccine, she says.
Markowitz remains convinced the vaccine is safe. "The CDC and the
FDA checked out these reports very carefully," she says.
"And we've done calculations for the number of cases reported and
the number of cases that you'd find in the general population, and we
have not found an increase."
Given these caveats, should girls be getting the shots?
Most major medical groups still think Gardasil should be part of
routine immunizations for 11- and 12-year-old girls.
Shots still strongly urged
There is more than the matter of cancer prevention, says Dr. Joseph A.
Bocchini, chief of pediatric infectious disease at Louisiana State
University Health Sciences Center in Shreveport and chairman of the
American Academy of Pediatrics committee on infectious diseases. The
vaccine could spare hundreds of thousands of women from the
psychological trauma and physical pain of a cycle of follow-up tests
when they have an abnormal Pap test result and the treatments for
pre-cancerous lesions that can cause infertility.
"You can actually prevent these infections and the cervical
abnormalities that require more invasive interventions," he
Whether the shots should be mandatory -- a step that has been
considered by Texas, Michigan and Virginia -- is another issue.
"This decision should be up to parents, and mandates are silly,"
says Harper of Dartmouth. "While the vaccine will improve the
health of American women, its real benefit is in the developing world.
And no matter what, Pap screening shouldn't be neglected. That's still
our best safety net."