Print

Print


OK, OK.  So it's a valid mail-order PhD.
 
Exactly what in the quackwatch account of Null's credentials do you claim is inaccurate?> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:30:32 -0400> From: [log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Gary Null answers critics on Steal This Radio #53 THURSDAY> To: [log in to unmask]> > If your reference is to the claim made by quackwatch that Gary Null > has a phony Ph.D., I have a letter from the dean of the college > rejecting that assertion, and would be glad to scan it and post it > here .... But that's just one of the bogus claims made by quackwatch > and those who rely on it for their facts -- big mistake.> > Mitchel> > > At 11:31 AM 8/22/2008, Eric wrote:> >Everything i read about this guy says "quack, quack"! A phony > >PhD? Come on, get real here...> >> > > Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 04:53:52 -0400> > > From: [log in to unmask]> > > Subject: Re: Gary Null answers critics on Steal This Radio #53 THURSDAY> > > To: [log in to unmask]> > >> > > You're entitled to your opinion, and I'm entitled to mine. But what> > > you wrote doesn't answer my challenge to you about citing Quackwatch> > > as a legitimate source.> > >> > > M> > >> > > At 03:45 AM 8/22/2008, you wrote:> > > >I suggested looking at Null's Web site because it tells you all you> > > >need to know about the way he is profiting from the gullibility of> > > >those who are justifiably suspicious of the medical and drug> > > >establishments, along with thousands of other lesser quacks like him> > > >(one of whom even used to be a member of this list.) Null et al.> > > >prey on that gullibility, and of course they are found lurking> > > >around the edges of the progressive movement looking for customers> > > >and credibility from outlets like Pacifica and now Mitchel's program.> > > >> > > >MB> > > >> > > >On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Mitchel Cohen> > > ><<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]> wrote:> > > >I'd like to know, actually, WHY you depend on Quackwatch for ANY> > > >arguments. Barrett, the head of quackwatch, has lost repeatedly in> > > >court in recent years, and his claims are specious up and down the> > > >line -- not only about Null, but about others as well.> > > >> > > >If you're going to argue against something Null says, at least get> > > >it right and do your own homework. Warning: Don't rely on> > > >Quackwatch, 'cause Barrett is shown to be the biggest quack in the pond.> > > >> > > >Mitchel> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >At 12:40 AM 8/22/2008, you wrote:> > > >There is also an informative article about Null on the Quackwatch> > > >site:> > > ><http://quackwatch.org/04ConsumerEducation/null.html>http://quack > > watch.org/04ConsumerEducation/null.html> > > >> > > >> > > >----------> > > >> > > >> > > >--> > > >******************************************> > > >Michael Balter> > > >Contributing Correspondent, Science> > > >Adjunct Professor of Journalism,> > > >Boston University> > > >> > > >Email: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]> > > >> > > >Website: <http://michaelbalter.com>michaelbalter.com> > > >Balter's Blog: > > <http://michael-balter.blogspot.com>michael-balter.blogspot.com> > > >******************************************> >> >> >----------> >Talk to your Yahoo! Friends via Windows Live Messenger. > ><http://www.windowslive.com/explore/messenger?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_messenger_yahoo_082008>Find > >Out How
_________________________________________________________________
Get ideas on sharing photos from people like you.  Find new ways to share.
http://www.windowslive.com/explore/photogallery/posts?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Photo_Gallery_082008