Print

Print


We must be humble.

Don




-----Original Message-----
From: UVM Flownet on behalf of Lisa Mekenas
Sent: Mon 1/26/2009 1:54 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: angles/Don
 
The box angled had a 54 angle corrections only (not that different)
The box straight had an angle of 60 degrees, vessel was at a 60 also. 
same jet area in both samplings. 
What a difference yeh?-- 
Lisa

-----Original Message-----
From: UVM Flownet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Don
Ridgway
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 1:45 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: angles/Don

You're saying that the spectral-Doppler angle was the same as the first
reading, just the color-box angle changed? 

Don




-----Original Message-----
From: UVM Flownet on behalf of Lisa Mekenas
Sent: Mon 1/26/2009 11:51 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: angles/Don
 
Don, 
Here's something interesting-- I just did a patient with a 80-90%
He was large, breathing movements, ect.
Diving vessel. There was no way I was going to get a 60 on this guy--
So I got the "correct " velocity and then just for grins and giggles 
Turned the color box straight up and down and got a velocity at 60--
Guess what-- my 404/110 went to 286/80! 
 I think it is the color box with the 60 angle.
Oh by the way-- the true angle of the flow was 54 degrees for the
stenosis
With the color box angled. 
Just thought that was interesting as I just had the patient on the table
after reading a few comments.
Lisa

To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html


To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html

To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html


To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html