I don’t know why the Unetixs Doppler should be considered “far inferior”, we have no complaints and in fact I looked at it in the first place because of glowing endorsements from Technologists who had used it elsewhere- we bought Unitixs because they seemed to be a generation ahead of Parks with respect to exporting to DICOM archives- Parks exported what amounts to a PDF of the report with analog tracings, whereas Unetixs exports discrete data- Parks may have improved in the 16 months since we bought Unetixs, but it was a clearly better choice then
From: UVM Flownet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of JASON r
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 6:25 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Unetixs PVR System(s)
Depends on you main modality, is it PVR or Doppler. The Doppler on the Unetix is far inferior to that of the Parks.. Keep this in mind as you purchase a new machine. The New Parks Flo Lab is nice. We Have four Unetix systems, mainly because we are a PVR orientated clinic.
Jason
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 17:45:23 -0500
From: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Unetixs PVR System(s)
To: [log in to unmask]
Hello and Happy New Year,
Our office is planning on up grading equipment this year, and is looking into possibly purchasing a PVR system from Unetixs. Does anyone have any experience with these systems? We currently are using an older Parks Flow Lab. How does Unetixs compare to Parks? I am looking for both pros and cons with regards to them.
Thank you.
JK
____________________________________________________________
Save $15 on Flowers and Gifts from FTD!
Shop now at www.ftd.com/17007
To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to: http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html
Send e-mail faster without improving your typing skills. Get your Hotmail® account.
To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to: http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html