Hi Matt,
I think we need to to take  signs and symptoms along with resting Doopler/PVR and ABI into account. If the patient presents with a good story for claudication and there is an ABI < .90, The result of exercising will be perfectly predictable. It will get worse. In this case the exercise test tells you nothing that you could not have predicted. Exercise should be reserved for those patients who present with an ambiguous hx and a normal resting Doppler/PVR/ABI. In most patients, a little bit of careful history taking can sort out the true claudicants from the spinal stenosis and DJD patients. If you have a patient who has a good sounding story for claudication with a normal resting study, that is a good indication for exercise. I have never been able to figure out what more there is to learn by exercising a patient who has an abnormal resting study.
On Sep 22, 2008, at 4:09 PM, David Dashman wrote:

Hello everyone, 

It seems there is a new trend in the peripheral vascular testing world concerning Pulse Volume Recording's. Many facilities are choosing to perform ABI's pre and post workout instead of taking the more traditional PVR approach when testing for lower extremity vascular disease. Does anyone know if this will take the place of PVR's or if they will slowly become unnecessary? Please please please shed some light. Thanks, 


To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to: http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html

To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to: http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html