Print

Print


You don't know Evan.  He has skied with dynafits on CMH's.

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Nathan Bryant <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

The founder of Dynafit Users for a Lighterweight Society? A proponent of fat skis? Say it ain't so.

roger Klinger wrote:
EO,
Don't you think 88 is plenty wide for 90% of conditions?

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Get Skied <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
I've always liked the idea of this ski, but would like it even more if
it was 7-10mm wider. At 88mm its too wide to be a thin ski and too
narrow to be fat even by 2004 standards (I know 95mm now qualifies as
mid fat in many people's minds).

Evan

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.

To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.

To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html