So they continue to own and control Stowe, but it's not under the AIG portfolio, so they don't have to really sell it as a "non-core asset".
How do they get away with this?

On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Skip King <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
At 07:48 PM 1/7/2010, you wrote:
So is it me, or does this smell of the kind of  creative accounting that always ends up costing taxpayers more money?

(giggle) You'll be a conservative before you know it. 8->

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.

To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.

To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html