Print

Print


I suggest a tea party movement, where have I heard that before.
Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Stanley <[log in to unmask]>
Date:         Wed, 19 May 2010 12:21:41 
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: FW: recertification

 

http://www.ardms.org/default.asp?ContentID=1012&menubar=1

 

Here is a link to the ARDMS recert page which states the accrediting
body for ARDMS.

 

 

 

From: UVM Flownet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lisa
Mekenas
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 12:09 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: recertification

 

And who is THEIR cerifying agency? What international agency are we
talking. In Europe the MD's do most ultrasounds. I am very interested in
these

other agencies whose standards of compliance are being imposed. Where on
the ARDMS web site is this listed? 

I like to follow this "trickle flow" , after all I'm just a vascular
tech in the ARDMS.

I might add, that we have no real powers of diagnosis, as in the MD,ect.


 

________________________________

From: UVM Flownet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Audrey
Fleming
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 9:50 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: recertification

 

This change has nothing to do with the DOL. It has to do with ARDMS
being in compliance with their certifying agency.

 

The recert is being required by the ARDMS by the agency that certifies
the ARDMS. This is a trickle down effect. If the ARDMS wants to keep
it's international certification then it has to abide by the rules set
forth. That means having some type of recertification in place for the
credentials it gives. Does this make sense? 

 

Vascular Technologists are not classifies as sonographers. Individual
facilities may choose to use the sonographer designation but by the
ARDMS they are technologists and according to the DOL they are
technologists, not sonographers. The ARRT gives the vascular sonography
designation and CCI uses the vascular specialist designation. The ARDMS
uses techologist.

 

Vascular technologists are not classified as sonographers by the United
States Department of Labor. They are classicified as cardiovascular
technicians and technlogists that also includes invasive cardiology,
echo, and ekg technicians.

 

My point was that if someone wanted to do the work and have vascular
taken out of the ekg technician category within the DOL then having
recert wuld be a good thing.

 

The thing is that this is a done deal. It means that every ten years
peple will have to show they can pass a hopefully rigorous open book
test for free. Outrage won't help, it will just get in the way of moving
foward and learning to deal with the new realities of holding the ARDMS
credential.

 

Audrey

 


Confidentiality Notice: This email message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. The information is intended only for the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please purge it immediately and notify the sender.

To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html