Hey everybody, In doing a quick search of this to back myself up I may have been too
quick to deliver my opinion. I need to browse the lit. a bit more. Seems
to be a controversy in the recent literature over this issue. More to follow. If anybody who's up to speed on this wants to chime it go right ahead and correct me. I still stand on my issue re billing and performing of complete vs limited studies.
~S
Norm. I attempt to do a complete study of the kidney. Research has shown that revascularizing a kidney with intrinsic vascular disease has limited impact on improving renal function. For that reason I think its important to gather all of that data. Plus if billing for a full study, to do less would be fraudulent. Wouldn't it be like just getting a CCA and a peak ICA velocity in the carotid?
Steve.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-----Original Message-----
From: Norman Paley <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 21:07:37
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Renal artery Doppler, partial study If positive?
After a conversation that I had today with a general ultrasound technologist I have a question. Does anybody here who does renal artery Doppler studies consider the study for that kidney completed and stop upon determining that the renal/aortic ratio is > 3.5, or, do you continue and try to get all of the additional data and views that are generally obtained in a complete renal artery study? Thank you for any response.
Norman Paley, BS, RVT
Technical Director Vascular Laboratory
Richmond University Medical Center
Staten Island, New York
To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html