well said, but I really don't think the "test" will be intimidating...it is as JP said supportive of our credential.
> Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 22:56:53 -0400
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: RVT
> To: [log in to unmask]
> I was cruising through the Flownet to investigate rumors for ARDMS
> recertification requirements and read a few posts about RVTs lack of
> recognition and a potential perception of something less than a sonographer.
> I have been both; from babies, to biliary, to breasts, to bilateral upper
> and lower extremity; I have scanned much of whatever ultrasound renders
> itself useful. I hold ARDMS credentials in vascular and abdomen. I take
> the greatest pride in my role as an RVT.
> I hold my RVT credential as one of my most valuable acquisitions over the
> course of my life and I know what it took to get there. And I know I had
> support and encouragement along the way for which I am ever grateful (Dr.
> Schneider). I really don't care what anyone calls me, as long as I am
> sought with confidence by the physician who recognizes my skills and wants
> me to look at his/her patient and tell them what I see. Really, is there
> any better way to convey acknowledgment than that?
> And if there is a lack of appreciation, I feel that the general unawareness
> of our careers leaves us in good company; the Physician Assistants. At
> least the unaware public believes that I have some technical ability; while
> many believe that a PA is less than a nurse. A patient a few weeks ago was
> left with the impression that a PA is like an administrative assistant for
> the doctors. They help to keep them organized and mop up their messes.
> And I am against the recertification, just for the record. Sorry, Joe. But
> I hate tests, especially when it contains the word: physics.
> To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to: