I brought this to the attention of our IT person (Rick Mallon) a couple of
weeks ago.  We tried it out and it does work.  The IT department could not
see my search results (on our new fancy dancy filter).  You can view it on
Smartboards SynochronEyes (computer monitoring system).

So this goes back to the idea that you should always be monitoring your
students in the classroom and the discussion about teaching personal
responsibility in the classroom.  Just because you can does not mean you

Also google has promised to bring out a full ssl search engine

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Craig Lyndes @ <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> Yesterday Lucie was reading to me some postings from one of her Google
> lists.  In this post was a story of a large school district out west where
> the network admins had blocked because the search engine
> provider has allowed people to encrypt their searches.
> To see for yourself try
> Both what you are searching for and the results are encrypted, no one can
> snoop on you (unless they are in the room and can see your screen).
> This school district had immediately come to the conclusion that they
> could no longer control where the students went on the Internet.  I am
> amazed, you still can't visit any sites that are on the web filter's
> blocked lists.  You just see the results that point to those sites.  The
> fallout is that no one could use any Google tools, could not log into
> gmail or any Google Domains for Education, could not access Google docs.
> I remember years ago when we were first talking about filtering when I
> said it would be a slippery slope.  Once an institution became addicted to
> the false sense of security that these software programs provide there
> would be no turning back.  Adult supervision would  become sloppy and
> people would get into the habit of treating the Internet callously and
> without the respect and caution that a field trip into cyberspace
> requires.
> When we were discussing this event at our last network admins meeting at
> FCSU one of the other admins (the young one who doesn't use Linux GUI's -
> command line only) opined that allowing thumbnail pictures and leading
> sentences from an ill formed search could shock a younger student.  Thus
> pointing out that my contention that the only real use for a filter is to
> prevent a student from stumbling onto in appropriate material accidentally
> is brought into question by this change in practice by Google.  I had to
> admit he was right, but allowed that if you had as one of your home pages
> the unencrypted google then the student would have to intentionally enter
> the encrypted address, so then it could not be accidental.
> Anyway - Is anyone out there concerned about this?  Is anyone planning on
> doing anything in response to this change by Google?  How many people now
> are actively scanning people's search results for forbidden content?  Does
> anyone have any opinion on the actions of the Western school district that
> would rather destroy all of the tools Google makes available than allow
> people to search without their supervision?
> Yeah - long day, can't wait for school to be over and things to settle
> down...
> Craig Lynde's


Technology Integrator
[log in to unmask]
The St. Johnsbury Elementary School
257 Western Ave - St. Johnsbury, VT 05819
802-748-8912 Fax: 802-748-1095