Good questions Mitch:
BP's rig the Deepwater Horizon at
1,260 meters above the ocean floor operates at but half the depth of the Independence Hub floating 2,414 meters above
the ocean bottom. These are but two of the 6669 platforms and
rigs active and removed of which 819 are presently still fully manned.
In other words Deepwater Horizon was but one unlucky match in the
tinder box and BP but one of the oligopoly that produces 23% of US oil
out of the gulf (about 2% of global production).
Of even more significance is the pattern of consumption in the US (See
attached chart.). 2/3 of oil consumed in US goes for transportation.
The many idle and torn-up RR tracks are in part the consequence of
deliberate policy decisions almost 60 years ago that resulted in the
building of a network of highways to accommodate trucking and the
consciously stimulated emerging two-car per family households.
Gentrification in the cities as old factory buildings became
apartments, office suites, etc and the newer industries established
production facilities in circumurban industrial developments required
inner city workers to commute to work outside the city center with no
choice but gas guzzling clunkers. Why no choice? Because there has
been no significant investment in public transportation. Then when the
current crisis threatened to terminate the US auto industry and it came
suckling at the federal teats, instead of using federal funds to
retrain auto workers and put them to work in a massive program to build
modern public transportation, the auto industry was pumped up and the
government instituted incentives for the purchase of new cars. And
what is our role? We complain about risky oil rigs and industry and
government malfeasance; but do not suggest, promote and campaign for
the rational alternatives that are actually realizable under this
Consider another relationship. Bringing home the military in the
present economy with 15 million unemployed
would tip the scale. It doesn't have the
capacity to absorb more workers. But bringing them home to build
infrastructure would save money and reduce oil consumption.
Our country is one big cauldron of boiling rage and dissatisfaction.
What is need is a positive program that can unite large numbers who
don't necessarily have to agree on everything. What those who have a
revolutionary perspective must grasp is that the experience of
struggling for reasonable reforms and thereby discovering from where
the opposition comes and the irrationality of its defense of the status
quo is the school in which people learn who the enemy is, who they can
trust, and how they have much more in common with their neighbors than
with the turkeys in Washington.
Yes, that's a rant, and i'm not sorry. And yes i am doing something
about it, not just ranting. We don't have much time.
On 6/11/2010 7:47 PM, Mitchel Cohen wrote:
[log in to unmask]"
1) BP is, unfortunately, the only corporation under attack for this
devastating catastrophic gusher in the Gulf.
Is there a list -- or better yet a MAP -- of where all of the deep sea
oil drillers are located?
2) Many of these would be in international waters, I suspect. Does the
US Coast Guard or other national agency of any country have
jurisdiction? If not, who does?
If no one, does that mean that every deep sea oil driller can do
whatever it wants? Maritime Law? International Law?
And if so, does that mean that any non-state actor (activist,
ecologist) can take whatever measures THEY want with impunity as well,
so long as they're in international waters?