Print

Print


Charlie:

Thanks for all this info, which I just glanced at so far.  Similar
transitions are occurring at Rutgers, but the thought of doing the analysis
was too much for me.

I will look at what you have sent and share it with people who would/could
be interested.

Larry 

On 8/14/10 9:56 AM, "Charles Schwartz" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Michael B complains, "and yet we never hear from Charlie "; so let me
> offer this list two of my recent writings that may have some tiny
> relevance to SftP.
> 
> (1) "What's Happening with the Pension Fund? - Part 27"
>      President Yudof claims the fund has been well managed; the facts
> contradict him.
> 
> (2) "Who Pays the Hidden Cost of University Research?"
>      published by Minding the Campus - web magazine of the conservative
> Manhattan Institute
> 
> These are posted at  http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~schwrtz
> <http://socrates.berkeley.edu/%7Eschwrtz>
> 
> If people find this of interest, let me know and I'll post more often to
> SftP.
> 
> Charlie
> 
> 
> Michael Balter wrote:
>> I wanted to follow up on this comment by Charlie, which, as I said
>> yesterday, came at an odd moment--when I had posted an article that I
>> think dealt with a serious subject. Perhaps because mart responded to
>> it (also in a serious vein, I think) it reminded Charlie of less
>> interesting repartee between mart, me, and others, and he chose this
>> moment to comment on it.
>> 
>> I think that list members should accept that I will continue to say
>> what I think on this list, mart will continue to express himself in
>> his inimitable way, Robert will continue his campaign against every
>> gene in sight, etc. But this list is what the members make of it, and
>> in fact a lot of the posts, especially from Phil (despite my
>> disagreements with him on many things, his posts are the backbone of
>> the list) and even me who often posts articles without comment, are
>> very useful and relevant. There is nothing to stop Charlie, a hero of
>> the science for the people movement, from posting material of interest
>> including about the struggles he is involved in, and yet we never hear
>> from Charlie except very occasionally to complain about what others
>> are posting; likewise from Carrol, who is just an old sourpuss anyway
>> and unlikely to contribute anything useful it seems. Likewise from
>> others who would have much to say, like Larry, and even the great
>> majority of Herb's posts mainly consist of complaining about what I
>> say on the list, which again is unfortunate as Herb is one of the most
>> sensible and eloquent presences here.
>> 
>> Nearly all of the initial posts on this list come from me, Phil, Sam,
>> Robert, and a couple of others (I'm not counting mart because he
>> mostly responds to what others say.) Perhaps most list members just
>> want a quiet life and just want to read articles or be kept informed
>> thanks to the material posted by us few, but if so then it is
>> inevitable that those who want to express their personal views here,
>> even when they are "provocative" or annoying to many, will dominate.
>> Again, I have no intention of stopping saying exactly what I think
>> here; but I don't want to be one of the very few doing that, and the
>> list would be much more interesting if more people would participate
>> and take initiative.
>> 
>> MB
>> 
>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:35 AM, Charles Schwartz
>> <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>> 
>>     What I see on this list from mart and from Michael (B) is an
>>     unending stream of very personal babble. I don't want to deny them
>>     their necessary outlets, but I must ask, Why do I bother to read
>>     (any of) it?
>> 
>>     Charlie
>> 
>>     mart wrote:
>> 
>>         if one googles 'chris knight' (in wikipedia) he is the founder
>>         of a radical anthropology group (and i think also lost his
>>         academic position in the uk for some comments and role he had
>>         in g20 protests in the UK).  he also has a take on the
>>         evolutuion of language which is basically a big critique of
>>         chomsky (including chomsky's article with hauser in science).
>>          i find it much more convincing than chomsky's approach (which
>>         seems all dressed up in hype with actual little rigor   much
>>         less reference to empirical data).  there free journal online
>>         has an interview wuith chomsky though i just skimmed it---and
>>         they go through their skepticism.
>>           s bowles (once a 'radical economist') and gintis also have
>>         gone through this kind of stuff.
>> 
>>         --- On *Thu, 8/12/10, Michael Balter
>>         /<[log in to unmask]
>>         <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>/* wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>            From: Michael Balter <[log in to unmask]
>>         <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>>            Subject: engaged anthropology
>>            To: [log in to unmask]
>>         <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>            Date: Thursday, August 12, 2010, 2:19 PM
>> 
>>            List members might find this profile of U of Utah
>>         anthropologist
>>            Polly Wiessner of interest. She reflects an increasing trend in
>>            anthropology, sometimes called engaged anthropology, to become
>>            more closely involved with research subjects--indeed, to
>>         make them
>>            active collaborators--and to make their welfare paramount. This
>>            viewpoint, which rejects notions that active involvement with
>>            subjects compromises scientific objectivity, is also associated
>>            with an activist and advocacy role for anthropologists. The
>>         recent
>>            revolt in the American Anthropological Association against
>>         the use
>>            of anthropologists in Iraq and Afghanistan is an example of
>>         this
>>            attitude; and it represents, finally, the throwing off of the
>>            lingering effects of McCarthyism's devastating attack on the
>>            field. All these issues are discussed, albeit briefly, at
>>         the end
>>            of the piece.
>> 
>>            MB
>> 
>>            --     ******************************************
>>            Michael Balter
>>            Contributing Correspondent, Science
>>            Adjunct Professor of Journalism,
>>            New York University
>> 
>>            Email:  [log in to unmask]
>>         <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>          
>>          
>> <http:[log in to unmask]>
>>            Web:    michaelbalter.com <http://michaelbalter.com>
>>         <http://michaelbalter.com/>
>> 
>>            NYU:    journalism.nyu.edu/faculty/balter.html
>>         <http://journalism.nyu.edu/faculty/balter.html>
>>            <http://journalism.nyu.edu/faculty/balter.html>
>> 
>>            ******************************************
>> 
>>            "When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask
>>            why the poor have no food, they call me a Communist." -- Hélder
>>            Pessoa Câmara
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> ******************************************
>> Michael Balter
>> Contributing Correspondent, Science
>> Adjunct Professor of Journalism,
>> New York University
>> 
>> Email:  [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> Web:    michaelbalter.com <http://michaelbalter.com>
>> NYU:    journalism.nyu.edu/faculty/balter.html
>> <http://journalism.nyu.edu/faculty/balter.html>
>> ******************************************
>> 
>> "When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why
>> the poor have no food, they call me a Communist." -- Hélder Pessoa Câmara