Sure, what Ben wrote has a lot of truth and accuracy, but much of it isn't new.  I don't think the electorate has ever been well informed.

I think what we saw Tuesday is the ping pong effect we are going to continue to see as long as the two major parties try to appease their extremists, especially if they continue to ignore the centrists. 

The country is split fairly evenly between R and D, c and l, etc.  Most of the country is in the center on most issues (genuinly so, not just by definition) - until legislatars and administrations pay attention to the center and make them feel like they are being looked after, the center is going to continue to throw people out.  

Case in point - I believe most of the country knows they need health care reform and they want it.  But they don't want something crammed down their throat, and that's exactly what they feel happened.  Whether that is really what happened or not - I don't know, I don't care.  I do know the Administration and Congressional leadership did a lousy job of selling it to the mainstream American - those folks in the center who have now taken action.  (I'm not saying Tuesday was all about healthcare - I'm just saying the handling of the healthcare bill is an example)

My $.02 of what happened Tuesday.


On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Caveat Lector wrote:

 No, I know of too many who did not vote. As much as I marvel at the idiocy of so many who did vote, I absolutely have no respect for those who did not vote. Not because of some wishful thinking that their votes might have led to different results, but because not to vote when one is able to is to spit on the souls of those who were and are deprived the opportunity.

What happened yesterday? Yesterday my thesis was confirmed, namely, that the average American voter is rather ignorant, if not congenitally so. They do not pay attention to current events and they have no knowledge of history, however recent. They do not understand economics, and they most certainly are clueless about government.

How one could expect any president and congress to have completely turned around the economy since 2008 boggles the mind of anyone who uses half of their brain. Sadly, in many ways, the American electorate is like someone who violates a restraining order: they've ignored the clear verdict of history and will themselves suffer from the folly of their transgression.

Mind you, I expected the results. (Although, I am pleasantly surprised by some races in New England.)

As for Charles Murray, he's a bitter old man still trying to defend a junked bit of blather from the 1990s. When he writes that his so-called "New Elite" is "unlikely to have even visited a factory floor, let alone worked on one," he reflects his unfamiliarity with this country.  The fact of the matter is that most Americans who joined the workforce since 1990 are unlikely to have even visited a factory floor, let alone worked on one.

Giving thanks that I live in New England,

caveat lector

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Leigh Daboll < [log in to unmask])" TARGET="">[log in to unmask]> wrote:

BTW, Ben, I guess yesterday's admonition to get out the vote worked!

On a more serious note, no gloating here.  There's serious work to be (un)done.

When I read this terrific WP article about 10 days ago...

...I couldn't help thinking that many of the fine folks on this List fairly accurately represent its focus.

Yes, there is a skiing reference in the article.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.

To unsubscribe, visit

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont. To unsubscribe, visit
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.

To unsubscribe, visit