agreed.  skied a west-slope yesterday- it was amazing skiing.  open enough where you could really, really go.  

another west-slope was skied by an associate of mine on saturday while i was at the beach- the video taken that day looked even better, and he concurred- it was very, very good with great coverage- all the little stuff was completely covered.

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:01 PM, roger Klinger <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Ok, I'll play along.
Snowfall wise, this has been an average season at elevation.  The stake and Scott's measurements are testament to that.

What has made this a great season(best since 2000, IMO) is
a)  Lack of rain/ice/thaw
b) Incredible snowfall at low elevation on the west side(see BTV records)

Which is why I did a double take when I read this:

 Greg Petrics <[log in to unmask]> wrote: So many west side lines this year are, frankly, rather bare.

On the contrary, there are more open lines on the West side this year than there have been in the last 10.  Above 2000', things are average, but below 2000' we have had record snowfalls and no thaws.  Since the hardwood forests that are so great for tree skiing top out at about 2600', having this low elevation snow is crucial for a great abundance of choices.

Jonny wrote
>Last year was one of he worst years I can remember

Even though it  was above average at elevation.  You will recall that many of last year's storms were elevation dependent and rained or left nothing below 2500'.

This year is so good down low, that even the big warm up of 10 days ago, and todays rain have made almost no dent in the snowpack.  I even skied low-elevation south facing after the warm up, and had plenty of base to spare.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.

To unsubscribe, visit