Print

Print


I don't see any ethical issues with filling or not filling non-work related ILL requests.  Some institutions are able to offer unlimited access to ILL as a side benefit to employment or even as a general service available to all validated customers.  Many institutions choose for reasons of institutional priorities and funding to restrict ILL access.  Both are valid, ethical choices.   
 
As for the workload of ILL colleagues in other institutions, in my opinion that is not a valid reason to restrict ILL.  If a particular institution chooses not fill an ILL request the customer is free to take that request elsewhere, generally to a school or public library.  The workload at the institution that owns the item would be unlikely to change based on the institution that originated the request.         
Lisa
 
 
 
Lisa Olsen Kilburn
Information Resources Specialist
 
Southern Regional AHEC
1601 Owen Dr.
Fayetteville, NC 28304
910-678-7222
[log in to unmask]


>>> Donna Beales <[log in to unmask]> 7/28/2011 10:31 AM >>>
Hello, I sent this yesterday (below), but find that in detailing the
problem, I neglected to put the emphasis on the *ethical* issues, not
the personal ones.  Although I greatly appreciate the back-patting,
sympathetic response was not my intent in posting.



I would be interested to move discussion away from how we personally
handle such problems to the bigger picture of the professional ethics
involved, and a profession-as-a-whole take on the following,
specifically:



*         The use of ILL services for non-work-related purposes drains
dollars and energy from the institution; I feel an ethical duty, and
have a managerial obligation, to act in  responsible manner to avoid
unnecessary expense.   I would add that this includes *Federal* programs
like Docline.  The cost is not merely to my institution, but
institutions beyond my own.  If you look at this closely, if we all do
this "a little bit" the end result is a big drain on resources and what
probably amounts to a significant cost.

*         The use of ILL services for non-work-related purposes adds a
burden to my ILL colleagues, and I feel an ethical responsibility to
avoid adding to others' workloads for such requests.



I don't think this has been well-addressed anywhere.  I see nothing
about use of Docline for such requests in the Docline policies, unless I
missed something, and MLA is also rather silent on the issue.



But there is a broader ethical and professional problem here, and it
involves not just my institution, but many institutions if the response
so far is any indication.



Donna Beales, MLIS
Lowell General Hospital
Health Science Library
295 Varnum Ave.
Lowell, MA 01854
Email: dbeales AT lowellgeneral.org
http://www.lowellgeneral.org/library

Tel. 978-937-6247
Fax 978-937-6855

Thank you for using our services.      

   

Tell us how we're doing.
<http://www.kwiksurveys.com/online-survey.php?surveyID=BMDHI_cd5c65f1> 



From: Donna Beales 
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:04 PM
To: 'Medical Libraries Discussion List'
Subject: ILL and Ethics



This may have been discussed previously, but I don't recall any recent
dialogue...



I'm interested to hear from colleagues on the issue of  ILL requests
that are really outside of your institution's purview and policies.
Please reply to the list for the benefit of all.  



Recently, I had a complaint about a refusal to provide ILL services for
a non-work-related educational request.  I referred the individual back
to her school library; I believe at the time I also explained that the
request would cost the institution upwards of $45 dollars for ILL fees
and copyright clearance.  



The individual did not approach me in any way to question the refusal;
the interchange was so benign in my POV that when the complaint was
brought to my attention, I was very surprised, and at first had
difficulty remembering the exact circumstance.  So far as I recall, I
was polite and took time to explain the reason, something I routinely
do.  I've assisted the person in the past and had what I thought was a
good relationship with her.



At the time, the person seemed to take in the information and appeared
accepting, but left the library and brought the matter to the Director
level.



I should clarify that I almost never refuse a ILL request from a staff
person & will fill it as long as the need is occasional, I have the
time,  and I can obtain the work for "free."  But if a request is going
to impact the institution's bottom line, or I just don't have the time
to handle it (I was short-staffed for several months during the
interchange and handling a CME reaccreditation) that's when I politely
refer to a more appropriate venue.



I'm thinking of a few examples of the types of ILLs I'm referring to,
but I'm sure there are many more:



"I need a few articles for my son's/daughter's science fair project..."

A staff member begins to order dozens of articles because s/he or a
family member has a disease/personal issue.

A staff member is in school, but the education is clearly unrelated to
their work or the mission of the institution, and they want to use ILL.



Clearly, these are issues of good policy writing.  One's policies on ILL
and document delivery services should clearly spell out the types of
requests that are appropriate, and management should buy in to them.  My
policies are clear that an ILL request must be of a work-related nature;
they were put in place because neither budget nor personnel resources
are infinite, and my Director was involved in the approval process.
The policy has stood for 11 years and has never been challenged.



There are several ethical and personal issues as I see them:



*         The use of ILL services for non-work-related purposes drains
dollars and energy from the institution; I feel an ethical duty, and
have a managerial obligation, to act in  responsible manner to avoid
unnecessary expense.

*         The use of ILL services for non-work-related purposes adds a
burden to my ILL colleagues, and I feel an ethical responsibility to
avoid adding to others' workloads for such requests.

*         There is a "feel good" component to this; refusal, no matter
how politely stated,  runs the risk of engendering bad feelings which in
a relatively small environment can impact library marketing.

*         There are shades of grey here; not every request is so
clear-cut, and there are exceptions to every rule.  Rules are made to be
broken-sometimes.

*         I explained to the person at the time that the ILL system I
would be using to place her request (not Docline) was the same one her
school would utilize, probably with quicker turnaround due to system
parameters that prioritize certain library types higher than my own.



If you have any thoughts on these issues, please do share.  I am
considering inviting the person who made the complaint to participate in
potential revision of policy, but I would like to have collegial
feedback to share with my manager as we approach a rewrite.



TIA.



Donna Beales, MLIS
Lowell General Hospital
Health Science Library
295 Varnum Ave.
Lowell, MA 01854
Email: dbeales AT lowellgeneral.org
http://www.lowellgeneral.org/library

Tel. 978-937-6247
Fax 978-937-6855

Thank you for using our services.      

  

Tell us how we're doing.
<http://www.kwiksurveys.com/online-survey.php?surveyID=BMDHI_cd5c65f1> 



This message and any included attachments are intended only for the use 
of the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain 
information that is privileged, confidential and protected from 
disclosure under applicable law.  Any review, disclosure, transmission, 
dissemination, copying or other use of this information by persons or 
entities other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited.  If 
you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the 
sender and delete the related message.  Thank you.


************************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail message is Legally Privileged
and Confidential Information intended only for the use of the 
individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copy of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this email in error, please immediately notify us by telephone
(910 678-7273) or e-mail so we may correct our e-mail addressing error
 and then please destroy the original message.
************************************************************************
For environmental purposes, please consider 
forwarding or saving this email electronically instead of printing.