Print

Print


Relevant, I think is the following:

 

OH so many thanks for that contribution Lou.  I feel like saying "flattery
will get you nowhere"; but I DO think comrades SHOULD read Binh's
contribution several times and THINK for yourselves, and perhaps follow up
with re-reading Karl's contributions to discussion of 1848, and not least,
of course, the Communist Manifesto.  

 

We are in EXCITING times: for the Arab world it IS their 1848; for us we are
pawns in the global crisis of capitalism, in a situation which even Lenin
had never seen the like.   Our understanding of how to apply Marxist
dialectics has never been so tried before.

 

And do not forget that when the Communist Manifesto talks of "the party",
Marx and Engels were not thinking of the CPSU(b), the CPGB, the CPI, or the
CPUSA - but of all the working class (and I think, at that time of the first
beginnings of industrial capitalism, they were thinking of the whole of the
"common people" - Burke's "mob" or "great unwashed".  We HAVE to create this
unity once again.

 

At 20 I was a young tank officer in the British Army looking forward to
fighting to end fascism; now I can only watch - and hope that this century's
20 yr-olds will have better success.

 

Paddy

http://apling.freeservers.com

 

-----Original Message-----

From:
[log in to unmask]
[mailto:[log in to unmask]
edu] On Behalf Of Louis Proyect

Sent: 28 August 2011 1:34 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [Marxism] US "Militant" greets NATO-backed rebel victory in
Libya

 

<snip>

 

On a Saturday afternoon in early January I had the distinct pleasure to meet
with E.C. "Paddy" Apling, an 84 year old Marxmail subscriber who like dozens
of others over the years have looked me up in New York City. 

I believe that most have found me quite amiable in person in contrast to my
carefully cultivated mad dog internet persona.

 

I was particularly interested in meeting a veteran of the 30s and 40s period
since I share my friend Paul Buhle's commitment to oral history. 

I was also involved in an oral history project with an old friend from the
SWP who has done video interviews with that truly "greatest generation",
namely those who stood up to capitalism and imperialism during the darkest
hours of humanity.

 

Despite being called Paddy, he is not Irish. As a youth, he found his birth
name Edward Chatterton a bit stuffy for his taste. Paddy explained to me
that when he was very young (5-10), he used to stay at his aunt's big farm
house, which had three staircases (one with doors top and bottom leading to
the servants' quarters), where he would hide from the elders, especially the
formidable Aunt Kate who would summon him as if in a Dickens novel: "Edward
Chatterton, come here at once". This persuaded him through a kind of
aversion therapy to adopt another name. 

The name Paddy came from a show in London in 1924 called "Paddy the Next
Best Thing" (his mother had been hoping for a girl.)

 

full: http://louisproyect.wordpress.com/2009/01/27/ec-paddy-apling/

 

 

From: Science for the People Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Michael Balter
Sent: 28 August 2011 4:32 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Popular Rebellion & Imperialist Designs

 

During WWII leftists, Communists, socialists, and progressives entered into
a temporary alliance with US and British imperialism to defeat Nazism and
fascism. After that war, the fight against imperialism and colonialism
continued.

 

There was clearly widespread support for the NATO intervention among the
rebels, as established by many journalists when it first began.

 

It is strange that some leftists cannot bring themselves to acknowledge that
there was a popular uprising in Libya which is now coming to fruition.
Arguing against the NATO intervention is legitimate, but failure to give
credit for the initiative, courage and sacrifice of the Libyan people shows
contempt against them, as I have said before.