We just went 1:1 with tablets here in Charlottesville VA. Here's a link to
our FAQ page about the program- are being issued USB
keyboards with these tablets

So far, our biggest issue has been bandwidth, but I've been really
impressed so far.

I hope that you don't mind the "foreign" perspective on your VT list-
lurking and contributing has been wonderful in making my impending move up
there feel connected to a community (even if it's only a virtual one for

Genevieve Gallagher
Charlottesville, VA

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Drew Blanchard <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> *Back-dooring a brand environment into a public school is a bad
> precedent.  Anything you add to an Apple you buy from the Apple Store.
> This is an incredible long term financial commitment to a single entity.*
> I have no qualms about relying on Apple and the Apps Store, but *do* have
> some serious concerns about using tablets for 1-to-1; they're inherently
> limited use items.  Printing, typing, lack of an optical drive - these are
> pretty basic functionality concerns.
> "There's an app for that" only goes so far.  If these are to be the
> primary devices (instead of an auxiliary or supplemental device), why limit
> what students can do with them?  Students need one device which can "do it
> all."  Are tablets really the way to go?
> Some apps are truly amazing, and their interactive features score big
> points on the "very cool" meter.  But the fact is, you must rely on those
> apps to work with the tablet.  Typing/presenting a major research report on
> them (for example) is, to put it mildly, annoying.
> So, does it come down to this?  We must choose between using intuitive and
> engaging apps, *or* a more fully functioning "traditional" device?  The
> thought of also purchasing keyboards and mice (or docks) to add to tablets'
> functionality is more than I, or our budget, can handle
> Drew
> ---
> Drew Blanchard, MAT
> Technology Teacher
> Winooski City Schools
> Normand St.
> Winooski, VT 05404
> (802) 655 - 3530 x6073