Hi,

I'm passing along this short review from Petros Evdokas, a long-time comrade in the Red Balloon Collective. I haven't yet read the document he's referring to, but he provides clickable links to it and I plan to do so shortly. I thought you might be interested as well ....

- Mitchel

From: Petros Evdokas <[log in to unmask]>

I just finished studying "The Pentagon Attack Papers", authored by

Barbara Honegger.

If any of you are interested in reading this study, it can be found here:

here:

http://www.truthjihad.com/PentagonAttackPapers.htm

and here:

http://ebookbrowse.com/the-pentagon-attack-papers-honegger-doc-d133077872

I strongly recommend reading this paper. Anyone who is interested in the

events of September 11 and how we ended up living in a world dominated

by what George Bush called a "war without end" will find plenty of very

useful material in it.

I'd like to tell you:

o- what this paper does

o- who the author is.

Who the author is

Barbara Honegger, M.S. is Senior Military Affairs Journalist with the

Naval Postgraduate School (1995-present), DoD’s graduate science,

technology, national security and homeland security research university.

She served as Special Assistant to the Assistant to the President

and White House Policy Analyst (1981-83).

She was the pioneering Irangate author and whistleblower on the October

Surprise (October Surprise, Tudor, 1989); was featured in the

Iran-Contra expose documentary “Cover-Up”; and was called as an

investigator-witness at both the 2004 and 2005 Los Angeles Citizens 9/11

Grand Jury hearings held at Patriotic Hall in Los Angeles, Calif.

Her work has been included by world 9/11 Truth authority Prof. David Ray

Griffin in his most definitive book on the September 11th attacks, "The

New Pearl Harbor Revisited" (Chapter 2, ‘Reports of Bombs’).

Honegger’s two-hour under-oath videotaped interview/testimony of key

Pentagon eyewitness April Gallop, provided the basis for a critical 9/11

lawsuit filed in Manhattan in 2008.

What she has to say is important both because of her position within the

military and political apparatus of the Empire, and also because her

training enables her to make sense of and speak authoritatively about

evidence and patterns arising from complex situations that involve the

branches of intelligence, military and political administration.

What this paper does

Barbara Honegger takes as her point of departure evidence that on

September 11 there were explosions inside the Pentagon right before it

was hit from the outside by an unknown something (plane, missile ?).

She proceeds to tie together that evidence and related testimonies to

the military exercises that it is now known were taking place on that

morning based on the premise that supposedly hijacked airplanes were

slamming into buildings... which turned out to be true.

She ties this with evidence and testimonies of similar explosions inside

the World Trade Center that took place before the planes hit the buildings.

A pattern emerges that leads all the way up to the official and

unofficial Imperial chain of command that enables her to lay out the

true depth of the conspiracy and some of its methods. Honegger shows

beyond any doubt that "outsider terrorists" could not have have achieved

what the US ruling class says they did, and that only domestic insider

conspirators very high up in the command could have arranged for the

events of September 11. And she proceeds to name names.

What The Pentagon Attack Papers cover has value both because of who the

author is, and also because of how she says it. In the study, Honegger

bases everything on facts, testimonies and evidence. Some part of the

material, about 5%, is conjecture that falls within the parameters of

the context, and is well within the working parameters of what a

patterns analyst does (in fact most analysts deal entirely in conjecture).

In her paper there is none of the wild and unverifiable speculation that

is so widespread in materials published within the September 11 Truth

Movement that keep discrediting everyone who tries to get involved with

it. Everything she wrote is interpretation based on facts, testimonies

and evidence.

I'd say that this paper is one of the most coherent indictments I've

ever read.