Mitchel Cohen wrote:
> I hitched from the Rainbow Gathering in Tennessee with a couple
> researchers traveling to Asheville, North Carolina, where
> working on some wild Tesla-related energy projects, independent
> government. They work out of an old metal silo in Asheville
> pretty cool, based n the work of Stanley Meyer, John Badini,
> Rodin, and Vortex-based mathematics and his Rodin-coil.
> The head of the "silo" research is Gregor Arturo, a
young fellow. He's
> very much into the "Thrive" free-energy stuff and
> (Check the "Thrive" video online, of which I am
pretty critical but
> which also has some interesting stuff in it.) The fellow I
> goes by the name Eden (aka Jeremiah), and he was very
> political, and had just arrived the week before from Colorado
> starting to do research at the institute.
> I haven't read any of the books they recommended, so I can't
say what I
> think of any of it, but they recommend:
> Stanley Meyer, "The Birth of New Technology"
> Margaret Cheney, "Tesla, Man out of Time"
> "Keely and his discoveries, 1893" and
> Keely, "Sympathetic Vibratory Physics"
> Patrick J. Kelly, "Practical Guide to Devices"
> especially an article posted in April 2012.
> Know anything here?
Petros Evdokas responds:
The ideological, philosophical and scientific dead end of
science ("scientificism") was highlighted again recently
with the "God
particle" (the Higgs boson) fiasco. Notice how they all dropped
appellation "God particle" the very next day, after using
it and hyping
it for more than a decade continually?
Same as the string theory and other particle based models of
They all keep bumping up on glass ceiling which they can not
Part of that reason is because conventional physics has abandoned
suppressed the branch that was born from its own body and loosely
referred to as "visionary physics" about thirty years
Another reason is that conventional science is unwilling and
of appreciating Orgonomy, which provides many answers to the most
deficiencies in the currently existing "officially
How we got here
Here are some (not all) of the elements that comprise the roadmap of
conventional science got stuck where it is now. It's like a man who
plucked out his own eyes and complains he can't see. [A woman would
1. The maturation of Capitalism into Imperialism that was completed
around the beginning of the 20th century, also signaled the
occupation and domination of the lands of Science by forces of
An occupation regime was set up and since that time, Science is
Since that time and to this day, most people, including scientists,
unable to tell the difference between Science and technology. This
the root of many problems.
2. One of the early battles embodying that takeover was that between
Edison and Tesla. All of the folklore (and mystification) existing
that revolve around Tesla's legacy is due to Edison's war against
Science, carried out for Capital in the name of profits.
Here's a short summary of that:
3. The great revolution of the sixties and seventies, due to both
anti-imperialist anti-capitalist character AND to the element of
Consciousness that it focused on and cultivated, was able to reunite
Science and philosophy temporarily, opening up the possibility that
Science might get out of the dead end it had entered.
The branch of science known as "Visionary Physics" was
scientists whose eyes were opened again by the revolutionary process
taking place around them and within them. Two works, in particular,
produced within that context, held the possibility of a change in
so that science could become Science again.
One was the book titled "The Tao of Physics", by physicist
Among other things in his book, Capra manages to point out the
ridiculousness of firing particles through bigger and bigger
accelerators at higher and higher speeds in the hope that these will
reveal something supposedly profound about the structure of the
Universe. The only thing that comes out of those
"experiments" is what
early computer engineers used to say about programming:
"G.I.G.O. - it
means Garbage In, Garbage Out". In other words, what you get
those "experiments" is what you put into them: particle
ever higher speeds and energies, and no way to make sense of them.
you don't cultivate your ability to make sense, you can not make
out of any of those experiments, nor devise meaningful experiments
relevance to the questions.
This profound guideline was suppressed.
Another significant item of the period was the book titled
and Beyond", written by Bob (Robert) Toben with physicists Fred
Wolf and Jack Scarfatti:
This book is the definitive source for comprehending quantum theory,
tangible reality and Consciousness. It is a presentation - from the
point of view of hard physics - of the idea that reality consists of
Consciousness congealed into space-time. It is the "Mother of
books and movies on the connection between quantum reality and
The mere existence of this book could have helped a restoration of
Science take place. But its point of view was suppressed and
the same way that healthy sexuality when suppressed becomes
into degenerate forms like sadism (a "secondary drive"),
Physics became suppressed, distorted, misunderstood, and now thrives
a perverted form that feeds billion-dollar industries of new age
dogmatism founded on mystification, ignorance and
4. The previous anti-Imperialist revolutionary period of the
twenties and thirties was also a historical juncture that created
possibility of a restoration of science to its formerly correct
orientation. It produced the branch of science known as Orgonomy,
primarily through the work of Wilhelm Reich.
Reich's work held, and still holds, the possibility of providing the
glue that can bind together currently existing scientific knowledge
a comprehensive "Theory of Everything". Even though that
term is often
the target of nervous humour, it is a noble and valid scientific
to unite what we know from the Theory of Relativity, Quantum Theory,
knowledge of Gravity, particle physics, electromagnetism, atomic and
nuclear theory AND the Life sciences, into one meaningful
The effort so far within conventional science is to hack at it,
but still with blinders on - you can see a summary of where all this
If you read even only the introduction of the above article you'll
that Life itself, and Life's very curious properties, exemplified by
knowledge that the very fact of Life's existence is a violation of
2nd Law of Thermodynamics, are excluded from the parameters that
scientists are exploring in order to put together a valid Theory of
Nevertheless, the quest for a valid Theory of Everything is a good
and it would be going in the right direction if it included Orgonomy
one of its perceptual or theoretical instruments that could help
it all into a meaningful Theory.
But Orgonomy is also suppressed and ignored, its findings and even
name are ridiculed by conventional scientists who have never made
to examine any of the postulates put forth by Reich, which are based
observations and easy to reproduce experiments.
At least Albert Einstein had the decency to try Orgonomy for a bit
tried to figure it out with Reich. But curious circumstances (and
perhaps the earth-shattering fear of a dissolving dogmatic
eventually diverted him from it.
In my view Orgonomy is still the only way to go in order to help
conventional science get unstuck. Orgonomy can provide tools for the
"big picture", ie, it can provide help to move forward in
for a unified Theory of Everything, but it can also help the efforts
currently being conducted within more narrow, specialized branches
science (such as those listed in Mitchel's letter at the top), to
context within which what the researchers are doing can make
If you're interested in reading a little more about this please see
short letter published here on the archives of the Orgone Critical
discussion group, titled:
"Re: [orgonecritical] Is orgone really a specific
Ring the bells
that still can ring, Forget your perfect offering.
There is a crack, a crack in everything, That's how the light gets
~ Leonard Cohen