Such "dissident" themes serve to hype fear of poliovirus, 

despite claims of poliovirus isolation found false,
http://www.harpub.co.cc/misc/OstromParalyticpolio.htm

despite obvious polio toxicology omitted from the mainstream polio paradigm.
http://harpub.co.cc/overview.htm

With toxicology avoided, the claim for virus causation can go nowhere.

The article below claims that acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) incidence rose in 
proportion to the doses of oral vaccine administered.  

That is not surprising, since changing diagnostics (from polio to AFP) to 
promote or protect vaccine programs, would give the impression of rising AFP 
incidence.

If there are high levels of mercury etc in the oral vaccine (as these may be 
faulty vaccines dumped on the Indian market) then sure, I'd agree the vaccine 
was causative.

Jim West
NYC

=====
Thanks Mitch for posting the text to this article, that I dispute:

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/08/28/polio-eradication-
campaign.aspx?e_cid=20120828_DNL_artNew_1