Print

Print


Let's not forget about C.A.R.E.
On Oct 18, 2012 3:05 PM, "Kimberly Higgins" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Yup!
>
> ________________________________
> From: UVM Flownet [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jason Roberts
> DHSc, RVT [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 1:50 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: SAAAVE ACT
>
>
> This program is still around correct?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Jason Roberts DHSc, RVT
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: "Bill Johnson" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 1:45:43 PM
> Subject: Re: CCA criteria
>
> BJ, Port Townsend, Wa
>
> First, Bill Schroedter, I must submit that we see and hear physiology,
> anatomy as well but I would suggest physiology is prehaps more
> important than anatomy.  Both are important, but one cannot be
> understood without the other.
>
> Joshua, I agree that greater standardization is needed, but that is
> incumbent on us!  For you I would suggest we "hear" in four dimensions
> if we only listen.  MRI and CT asert they look in three dimensions.
> But they do not listen.  I keep hearing how 4D is better than 3D.  I
> agree and continue to listen.
>
> On 10/18/12, Joshua Waks <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > High quality duplex scanning is exceedingly important; however, there's
> too
> >
> > many variables and controversy.  Intra-observer variability will always
> > create
> > a difference, but if you're looking at a stenosis of >70%, where do you
> > align
> > the sample volume to?  Vessel wall or flow jet?  If it's aligned to the
> flow
> > jet,
> > the transducer being at a slightly different approach, the tech will
> view a
> >
> > slightly different jet, and get a different velocity, because we're
> viewing
> > a 3-
> > dimensional object in 2 dimensions.  GREATER STANDARDIZATION IS NEEDED.
> > I know this, and I just graduated from my Vascular Tech program!
> >
> > To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
> > http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html
> >
>
> To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
> http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html
> To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
> http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html
>
> ________________________________
> This e-mail, including attachments, is intended for the sole use of the
> individual and/or entity to whom it is addressed, and contains information
> from Licking Memorial Health Systems which is confidential or privileged.
> If you are not the intended recipient, nor authorized to receive for the
> intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> use of the contents of this e-mail and attachments is prohibited. If you
> have received this in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and
> delete the message immediately. You may also contact the LMH Process
> Improvement Center at 740-348-4641. E-mail transmissions cannot be
> guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted,
> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions
> in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail
> transmission. Thank you.
>
> To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
> http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html
>

To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html