Print

Print


I have to agree with everything except for whomever said that automation
increases the amount of time you can spend with the patient. I have 5
RVT's here  that will swallow their eyeballs when they read that.

 

When we went to EMR the amount of prep work doubled for my
technologists. Now they have to search through a patient's electronic
records to find op notes, previous office visits and previous ultrasound
exams. And this is assuming the person we paid 10 dollars an hour to
scan the info into the computer found it relevant enough to in fact
"scan it in".  EMR definitely made things more "convenient" but other
than that it didn't have a positive effect on our lab.....Yet J. So far
we all miss our chart's like crazy. 

 

Everyone loves PACS, but I can't say that this saved us any time either.
But this was definitely more of an equal exchange since we no longer do
printed worksheets.

 

From: UVM Flownet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Karen
Limone
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 2:52 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Entire leg vs to knee venous

 

Well said

 

________________________________

From: UVM Flownet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Phil
White
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 1:39 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Entire leg vs to knee venous


To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html