By
Karen
Charman
The history of liberty is a history of resistance
--
Woodrow Wilson
While New Yorkers anxiously await Governor Andrew Cuomo's decision
on whether to lift the state's de facto moratorium on high-volume
slick-water horizontal hydraulic fracturing, or
"fracking," Woodstock, the iconic counter-culture
capital of the world, has become the first municipality to call for
legislation to make fracking a Class C felony.
Woodstock's action is just one small town's response to a rapidly
escalating global war over fracking. To both sides in this war --
environmentalists and citizens who oppose fracking on the one side and
the gas industry and its supporters on the other -- the upcoming ruling
to allow or ban fracking in New York is being viewed as (you should
pardon the expression) a watershed event.
Decisions made in Albany and in towns like Woodstock will likely
determine whether fracking goes full steam ahead everywhere, or whether
its momentum can be slowed or even stopped. New York, after all, has a
rich history of environmental activism and democratic movements, and
anti-fracking activism has spread like wildfire over the last couple of
years. New York is also home to abundant supplies of clean freshwater, an
essential resource that is in crisis globally and that could be
endangered by the practice.
Fracking? Please Explain
On January 15, the Woodstock Town Board unanimously passed a
resolution to petition New York State to introduce New York Public Law #1
-- which would impose stiff penalties for fracking and related
activities. Before taking this step, the Woodstock Town Board took two
others: banning fracking within its borders and outlawing the use of
frackwaste fluid, some of which is known as "brine" (because of
its heavy salt content), on its roads. This material is used as a
de-icing agent in the winter and for dust control on dirt roads in the
summer. Despite the fact that brine from oil and gas wells (whether
fracked or not) is laden with heavy metals, toxic chemicals, and
radioactivity, since 2008 the Department of Environmental Conservation
has granted approval for it to be spread on roads in the western part of
the state.
New York Public Law #1 was conceived and drafted in May 2011 by the
Sovereign People's Action Network (SPAN) and FrackBusters NY -- two
citizen anti-fracking groups spearheaded by the late Richard Grossman, a
legal historian, democracy activist, and founder of a movement to ban
corporate personhood and strip corporations of their special legal
privileges.
Fracking is used to extract "unconventional" sources of natural
gas or oil, like those found in shale formations. Unlike the large pools
of gas that make up "conventional" sources, the gas in shale is
typically found in separate tiny bubbles throughout the rock formation.
In order to get it, drillers create a "permeable reservoir" by
shattering the rock formation that contains the gas.
This involves drilling a deep well straight down into the shale, then
turning the well at roughly 90 degrees so that it runs horizontally
another 10,000 feet or so. The well is fracked when a mixture of water,
chemicals, and sand is pumped in at explosive pressure to force open
cracks in the rock, enabling the gas to flow back up to the
wellhead.
Since these wells travel under aquifers, lakes, rivers, and streams, much
concern has been raised about the potential to contaminate groundwater
and other freshwater supplies. Fracking also requires a massive
industrial operation, which creates significant air pollution, noise, and
truck traffic. Large amounts of various toxic compounds, plus nitrous
oxide, a key component of ozone, spew from diesel generators, drill rigs,
trucks, condensate tanks, and other equipment, as well as the flaring of
wells.
In communities across the country where fracking has been underway for
more than a decade, the process has left a trail of poisoned people,
serious water pollution, including radioactive contamination of drinking
water supplies, and potential
threats to the value of people's homes and land in drilling areas.
The gas industry has denied that its actions are responsible for these
problems.
Meanwhile, serious questions have been raised about the integrity and
economic viability of the entire enterprise. Officials within the United
States Energy Information Administration, a division of the Energy
Department, have suggested that estimates of gas reserves may have been
purposely inflated, a concern graphically illustrated in hundreds of
industry emails and internal documents -- some of them dripping with
contempt.
According to one industry insider, "The word in the world of
independents is that the shale plays are just giant Ponzi schemes and the
economics just do not work." Another equated the hype around shale
gas as a "charade" and said companies involved were
"having an Enron moment," adding that "they want to bend
light to hide the truth."
On another environmental front, evidence is mounting that a vast
expansion of shale gas extraction will dramatically increase global
warming. That's because the emissions of methane -- a much more potent
greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide -- leaking out of the ground in
drilling fields are much greater than previously known. Considering that
fracking is becoming a global phenomenon, the methane leakage could be a
significant new source of greenhouse gas emissions.
SPAN, FrackBusters NY, and the Woodstock officials who passed the
resolution calling for criminalizing the activity believe that existing
law and regulation won't protect New Yorkers from the irreversible damage
fracking would inevitably cause. On its website, SPAN says: "The
traditional way to prevent irreparable harm is by enacting laws
criminalizing such behavior and by imposing
deterrent-level penalties."
A Law with Real Teeth
As such, the law is comprehensive in scope and mandates prison
sentences of between five and 20 years along with minimum fines of $1
million per violation. Activities deemed felonies under the law
include:
- extracting oil and/or gas by fracking in New York State;
- mapping, exploring and locating oil and/or gas deposits with the intent
to frack;
- importing frack-related materials into the state, including fracking
wastewater and drill cuttings;
- withdrawing any water in the state for the purpose of fracking
anywhere; and
- owning, possessing or transporting fracking paraphernalia anywhere in
the state.
The law also goes after corporations -- and their boards and top
management -- found to violate it. New York corporations would have their
corporate charter revoked, while those chartered elsewhere would have
their authority to do business in the state rescinded. Such corporations
could also have any assets they had in New York seized to be sold at
auction, with the proceeds going to the state treasury.
Nor does Public Law #1 exclude government personnel. It would also make
any person working for any level of government in New York, whether as an
employee or as an elected or appointed official, liable not only for
compensatory and punitive damages, but also legal expenses if that person
was found in violation.
"The oil and gas mining laws of New York, as presently written,
disempower citizens and communities while treating corporate fracking and
fracking-related activities as legal, despite the extreme and
irreversible harm this industrial process causes," FrackBusters NY
said in a statement from November 2011, when the group first unveiled the
draft law.
The law is intended to move the debate over fracking out of the
regulatory arena, whose often glacially paced and always expensive
procedures are designed only to mitigate rather than prevent harm.
Instead, the law would require officials to stop the damage before it
occurs.
In October 2011, a month before he died, Grossman gave an interview to
Russell Mokhiber, editor of the Corporate Crime Reporter, in which
he said that he and his co-activists had no illusions about the New York
State Legislature: "But theoretically at least, that is where laws
are made. And that's where sovereign people go to instruct our
representatives. Our approach to our legislators is: we wrote this law --
now you pass it."
Grossman also said that anti-fracking activists understood that this
wouldn't happen "until we build a formidable statewide movement that
is not only talking about fracking as a destructive technology, but also
about illegitimate rule by a very small corporate class."
Jobs vs. Environment: A Familiar "Choice"
Anti-drilling sentiment is rising in New York. Currently, 43
municipalities have enacted bans, 110 have passed moratoriums, and there
are movements for either outright bans or moratoria in another 91
municipalities.
Not everyone is opposed to fracking, however. Like many areas in the
country, the upstate economy is struggling with high rates of poverty and
unemployment, issues that loom large for many people living in areas
above the shale. Forty-four municipalities have passed resolutions
supporting fracking, though opponents in some of those communities are
trying to repeal pro-fracking resolutions and enact either a ban or
moratorium.
The public's concern about shale gas extraction is much more nuanced than
the common but crude "jobs versus environment" framing.
According to a
survey of 600 residents in upstate New York by Cornell University's
Survey Research Unit in January 2011, 46 percent said the need for jobs
and economic issues was the most important concern facing their
community. And 70 percent of those living in counties with urban area
populations of between 10,000 and 50,000 ("micropolitan"
counties) said creating local jobs was the most important goal of their
local government, while 59 percent of respondents in more sparsely
populated areas agreed.
At the same time, environmental preservation also scored high among
upstaters. In response to the question, "Given the current economic
challenges facing New York State, do you believe state and local
governments should be committed to protecting long-term environmental
values?", 90 percent said yes. When specifically asked about natural
gas drilling and whether the risks to water quality outweighed the
benefits of the revenues, or vice versa, 65 percent said the risks
outweigh the benefits, 24 percent said the revenues were more important,
and 11 percent said they didn't' know enough about gas drilling to
answer.
Regulatory Business-as-Usual -- But with a Twist
Anti-fracking groups delivered 204,000 letters on the New York
Department of Environmental Conservation's proposed regulations on
January 11, 2013, the last day of a 30-day public comment period that
included the Christmas holidays.
The DEC took most of 2012 to read the 66,000 comments generated during an
earlier public comment period. Yet the agency appears to be pushing hard
to meet a February 27, 2013 deadline to approve the proposed regulations
that would pave the way for the issuing of drilling permits. If the
fracking regulations are not finalized by that date, the proposed
ruleswould lapse, in which case the entire process would start from
scratch, probably delaying any decision to allow fracking in the state
for years.
Governor Cuomo and the DEC have come under intense criticism for rushing
the process. The most recent comment period under the state's
environmental review -- quite possibly the last -- asked for public input
on regulations the agency put out before its environmental review was
finished.
There has been no comprehensive study of fracking's health impacts by
independent experts, a glaring omission in the state's environmental
review, which citizens and environmentalists have repeatedly called on
the governor and DEC to remedy. Instead, the Cuomo administration decided
to have the state Department of Health conduct a health review that
veteran Albany Times Union columnist Fred LeBrun describes as
"opaque."
"To this day," LeBrun continues, "the public has not a
clue as to what the health department is actually looking at, what's
being reviewed, whether any recommendations for change will be made.
That's all being kept secret by the administration. And apart from the
names of the three respected public health experts from outside the state
vetting the health department's work, we know nothing of what they are
being asked to vet, whether they, too, can make any recommendations, [or]
what the limits of their oversight might be."
The rule-making on fracking "has been from hell, an
abomination," LeBrun said. "The public has been deceived,
misdirected and kept utterly in the dark over where the state was heading
concerning the most important environmental issue of this
generation."
Frackbusters NY says New York's oil and gas mining laws, as currently
written, "disempower citizens and communities while treating
corporate fracking and fracking-related activities as legal, despite the
extreme and irreversible harm this industrial process causes." It
further charges that the New York DEC "functions as a pro-corporate
agency, enabling hazardous extraction processes that benefit the few
against the interests of local communities and the vast majority of
citizens."
The DEC's behavior in its environmental review of fracking seems to bear
out the group's allegation. Under existing state law, DEC must publish
its environmental review, a document known as the Supplemental Generic
Environmental Impact Statement, or SGEIS, at least ten days before it
releases its final decision. The SGEIS will contain the reasoning behind
the DEC's decisions on fracking as well as whether or not it will be
permitted in New York.
If the state is to meet its February 27 deadline to finalize its
regulations and lift the de facto moratorium on fracking, the SGEIS would
have to be published by February 13.
But whether Cuomo approves fracking or not, this high-stakes fight will
undoubtedly continue.
To the deep-pocketed and politically powerful fossil fuel industry --
which has run out of large, easily exploited reservoirs of fossil fuels
-- fracking is the only way to get at much of the vast supplies of what
is left. Global warming or not, the fossil fuel sector is aggressively
securing as much of those sources as they can throughout the
world.
To those concerned about the immediate harm to their health, the
environment, and their communities, as well as the continued existence of
our species and other life forms we share the planet with, stopping
fracking is a question of life and death.
If Cuomo does approve fracking in New York, thousands have pledged to
continue the resistance with acts of civil disobedience. Can ordinary
citizens prevail, Occupy Style, when the money piles are high, and the
stakes even higher? Stay tuned.