Print

Print


Hi, I have been attending conferences since 1974... AIUM, WFUM, SDMS,
RSNA early on that is all we had and I was fortunate to receive awards and
publish13 scientific papers,,, mostly AIUM , SDMS and RSNA. I should go for
number 14,,, maybe the 13 is unlucky!!! It is on my bucket list. Some years
I had to stay home and find other ways to meet my CME's. Thank you GE site
and Davies Publishing.
 Granted while I was at Yale we were sent by a grant and Ken Taylor felt
it very important for technologist to publish..Dr. Fogarty also the same,
felt it important for us to publish and present,, with it comes a sponsored
trip.  Education has fallen by the wayside in the minds of department
administrators whom admittedly go to several national conferences,,,"for
the benefit of the dept".. we need to get the entire staff to national or
regional conferences. Department heads would benefit by sending another
staff member in their place and reporting back.  It was always expected
with our jobs,, benefited one national conference per year. I would
encourage all to incorporate it into our jobs.
I am a consultant without benefits and currently pay my own way.   Las
Vegas is not far away for me and the airfare is about as much as a taxi
ride in NYC..challenging times,, to get to one conference a year. I am
looking for alternatives. I have a friend in Las Vegas I could stay with..
 SDMS in Vegas and without SDMS our RVT, RDMS, RCDMS and on and on... would
not mean much without SDMS and AIUM. Variety is the spice of life,, get out
there and connect with others.
Thank you for this forum and thank you Joan Baker for your contributions.
Denise Levy RVT, RDMS, RDCS,,, former ARRT



Denise Levy

cell 408-391-0837
Saratoga, CA
Ultrasound Professional Credentials
RDMS, RVT
Transcranial Doppler
Skype denisevascular12


On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Joan P Baker <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> This is an accurate description of the way it is Paul, I have been on this
> side of running or trying to run meetings for national organizations (AIUM
> 1974 Seattle) etc and if you do it once you want to do it again because you
> learn so much the hard way the first time you feel how much better it would
> be the next time. ****
>
> ** **
>
> There is just one part missing from your description and that is the
> exhibitors. Without them there would be no meeting, but you would not know
> that by the way they are treated. I never thought of them the right way
> until I was one of them. Believe me you have no idea what it takes to
> exhibit at one of your orgs meetings. First of all you pick cities that
> attract participants to come to, often these are the worst cities for
> exhibitors. Some of the reasons 1) cost of hotel, 2) Union labor requiring
> you to use them to open your crates and deliver them to your booth (a $1000
> to move one crate on wheels from an elevator to a spot on the exhibit floor
> in typical.)  Storage fees for your crates from when they arrive at the
> city to when they move them to the venue for the meeting. Including of
> course the cost of moving them etc etc. Meeting/exhibits close  late on
> Saturday requiring Sunday take down and very high labor rates. 3)
> attractive  place for participants to go such as River Walk in San Antonio,
> exhibitors see little of participants as they are lured away. Also golf
> resorts attendees go for 4 hour games. Exhibit hours are so grueling that
> companies have to send more staff to cover the booth in shifts. (RSNA is
> the worst). As a very small company with an 8 by 10 booth SVSís recent
> meeting on the west coast (the same coast as our company) cost our company
> approx $12,000 to exhibit for 2 Ĺ days, with a very small vascular
> technology attendance and a lot of sales to make a ROI. I am not
> complaining I just want the technology organizers to see the other point of
> view, and appreciate that sponsorships and registration fees are all adding
> to the costs with little way of proving a ROI that is attractive. The SVS
> meeting they would not even give a program or a lanyard to the exhibitors
> having charged them an arm and leg to be there. We also were not permitted
> to eat the food in the exhibit area provided to attendees. These types of
> decisions make it difficult for companies to justify supporting the field
> in this way. There has to be give and take. SDMS does more for exhibitors
> than anyone, at least we get  a massage booth! They have breaks during the
> sessions when few come to the exhibit hall, Board members always come down
> and thank exhibitors for their support. These small things mean a lot you
> have no idea. ****
>
> *From:* UVM Flownet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of *
> [log in to unmask]
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 20, 2013 9:36 AM
>
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: SDMS****
>
> ** **
>
> My first response to this thread was hurried because my wife couldn't
> understand what was so important that was taking so long to type a response
> on the internet.  LOL  Now that I'm on vacation in Galveston I have the
> time to respond while my three grandkids are arguing over the toys
> scattered all over the floor.
>
> As I am sure you are all aware, continuing education providers who strive
> to maintain their accreditation status must comply with several things, one
> of which is that you must be responsive to the needs of your attendees.
> This is the reason for the after-conference survey forms asking for
> suggestions for upcoming topics.  Most organizations have an "other
> comment" area as well.  It is in this area that people indicate their
> interest in having the conferences held in "fun and entertaining" venues.
> The challenge for the organization is to comply with all of these requests
> to ensure that there is enough attendance to cover all of the costs (hotel
> requirements, meeting room costs, honorariums, etc.) and hopefully to come
> out a bit ahead to cover the administrative costs of running the
> organization.  I most recently served as the technical program director for
> the annual spring meeting of the Southwest Chapter of the Society of
> Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.  I worked very closely with the
> physician member who served as the medical program director and the
> executive director.  While doing so I was privy to the data regarding past
> meetings and the concerns for future meetings.  It is critical balance to
> ensure that the educational content, the meeting site (the entertainment
> value), and the hotel choice all balance to ensure that the expenses are
> met, the hotel requirements are fulfilled, and a bit of profit is made to
> apply to the next meeting.  This meeting only had two tracks, one for
> technologists and one for physicians.  Also this organization is a regional
> five state organization.  The complexities that the SDMS faces being a
> national meeting producing five separate tracks every year for the annual
> meeting must be rather daunting for the organizers.  Again, I think, and it
> is only IMHO, that they do a stellar job.
>
> I have also attended a couple of SVU annual meetings, one AIUM annual
> meeting, and one SNM annual meeting.  I maintain memberships in all of
> these organizations as well as the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology
> which I have never attended a meeting.  The annual dues for all of these
> organizations are well over $100 a year each but I maintain them for the
> myriad of reasons anyone supports their professional organizations,  SDMS,
> again IMHO, offers one of the best cost per CME awarded ratios of any of
> these organizations.  But I do agree with my fellow flownetters that we as
> professionals and paying members and/or attendees should continue to hold
> these organizations' feet to the fire to continue offering top notch,
> prevalent, and engagingly pertinent educational content.
>
> Paul English RT(N), CNMT, RDMS, RVT****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kelly <[log in to unmask]>
> To: UVMFLOWNET <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thu, Jun 20, 2013 12:25 am
> Subject: Re: SDMS****
>
> If your focus is single modality, then SDMS is probably not your forte. If
> you require education in multiple modalities this is probably the most
> varied bang for your buck. I agree that some things could be consolidated
> but I truly feel that SDMS has the sonographersPaul  best interests at
> heart. ****
>
> ** **
>
> If you don't feel it's educational for you, that's a personal choice. You
> can choose not to go. ****
>
> ** **
>
> I'd be interested in a follow up as to your phone call since you chose to
> publish your "non judgmental" observation. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Kelly abcdefghijklmnop
>
> Sent from my iPhone****
>
>
> On Jun 18, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Doug Marcum <[log in to unmask]> wrote:****
>
> Lol :).  Thanks Jason ;)
>
> *Doug Marcum* ****
>
> RDMS,RDCS,RVT(APS),RPhS****
>
> Advanced Ultrasound Consultants****
>
> Global Vein Solutions****
>
> *321-231-2191*****
>
> *www.advancedusconsultants.com *****
>
> *On-site phlebology ultrasound training, staffing, and practice
> consulting *****
>
>
> On Jun 18, 2013, at 11:47 AM, vasc1 <[log in to unmask]> wrote:****
>
> Doug you really do make several great points.****
>
> Education first. :)  Where is the fun in that..****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Dr Jason Roberts ****
>
> [log in to unmask]****
>
> 954-801-2496****
>
> ** **
>
>
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Doug Marcum <[log in to unmask]>
> Date:
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: SDMS
>
> ****
>
> I humbly and completely disagree. I have been a part of these meetings as
> well.  If you are going to charge a premium, offer a premium product.  You
> can't offer a national meeting and thinning out the curriculum with the *
> assumption* that everyone wants "entertainment". The primary purpose of
> these meetings are education first.  If someone wants entertainment, then
> that's a premium to pay to miss lectures. I'm not sure what your point was
> about "strict rules of length of each lecture" as that's always a given.
>  If the budget is so tight, as much as many like Vegas, maybe it should be
> at a less expensive venue. Then maybe more speakers could be afforded.  **
> **
>
> ** **
>
> D
>
> *Doug Marcum* ****
>
> RDMS,RDCS,RVT(APS),RPhS****
>
> Advanced Ultrasound Consultants****
>
> Global Vein Solutions****
>
> *321-231-2191*****
>
> *www.advancedusconsultants.com *****
>
> *On-site phlebology ultrasound training, staffing, and practice
> consulting *****
>
>
> On Jun 18, 2013, at 11:05 AM, unclepauly28 <[log in to unmask]> wrote:**
> **
>
> I have been to several SDMS annual meetings over the years as well as SVU,
> AIUM, and SNM.  I have also settled as program director for CME activities
> for these various organizations and have been solely responsible for
> putting together lectures for independent organizations requesting CME
> approval from these and other providers.  There are relatively strict rules
> for the length of each lecture in order to award credits. As had been
> observed these providers are under more stringent budgetary constraints
> more than ever before.  Hotels and convention facilities are charging more
> to use their spaces. Also today's meeting attendees demand more
> "entertainment" activities apart from the meeting itself to justify their
> personal cost of airfare, hotels, used PTO time, etc. ****
>
> ** **
>
> I've always personally found the SDMS meeting to be a good educational
> value as well as excellent content. Just the fact that they have five
> separate tracks to meet the needs of a wide range of sonographers' practice
> needs is evidence of their response to their meeting attendees' interests.
> I would love to go this year but the SDMS meeting now coincides with my
> current anniversary.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Sent from my Samsung Epicô 4G Touch****
>
>
> Nancy Hohn <[log in to unmask]> wrote:****
>
> I attended the SDMS conference once in Vegas and it was 45 min of lecture
> with 2 hrs of breaks.  The whole thing could have been put into 1-2 days.
> Iím sure the casino benefited though.  ****
>
>  ****
>
> Have a great day!****
>
> Nancy Hohn, BS, RVT, RDCS****
>
> Cardiovascular Sonographer****
>
> Nebraska Heart Hospital****
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* UVM Flownet [mailto:[log in to unmask]<[log in to unmask]>]
> *On Behalf Of *Doug Marcum
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 18, 2013 5:57 AM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* SDMS****
>
>  ****
>
> Good Morning All,****
>
> Just a humble observation....In years past, I always looked forward to
> receiving the SDMS annual conference program in the mail.  I was surprised
> this week when I received it. I remember the program being 15-20 pages of
> information and choices of lecture disciplines that filled the day...
> Multiple AM and PM choices...I find myself looking at a *NINE* page
> program with not a lot in it.  I'm honestly disappointed more than
> anything.. On Friday, the first day of the conference there are only 3
> lectures per "track" the entire day?!  And on three of the four tracks
> (abdominal, Cardiac, and OB/Gyn, the same speaker is presenting 2 of the 3
> talks. I'm not judging, but for national meetings, I find it more appealing
> to hear a broad range of speakers to hear different perspectives, delivery,
> etc.  what's happening here?  Are there budget cuts?  I will call the SDMS
> myself but was wondering if anyone else noticed this.  I'm not sure I'm
> getting my money's worth to fly to Vegas for this. ****
>
>  ****
>
> D
>
> *Doug Marcum*****
>
> RDMS,RDCS,RVT(APS),RPhS****
>
> Advanced Ultrasound Consultants****
>
> Global Vein Solutions****
>
> *321-231-2191*****
>
> *www.advancedusconsultants.com *****
>
> *On-site phlebology ultrasound training, staffing, and practice
> consulting *****
>
> To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
> http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html****
> ------------------------------
>
> NOTE: This electronic message and attachment(s), if any, contains
> information which is intended solely for the designated recipient(s).
> Unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution, or other use of the
> contents of this message or attachment(s), in whole or in part, is
> prohibited without the express authorization of the author of this message.
> To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
> http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html To unsubscribe or search
> other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
> http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html****
>
> To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
> http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html To unsubscribe or search
> other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
> http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html****
>
> To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
> http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html ****
>
> To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
> http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html ****
>
> To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
> http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html****
>  To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
> http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html
>

To unsubscribe or search other topics on UVM Flownet link to:
http://list.uvm.edu/archives/uvmflownet.html