Our first year with Chromebook 1:1 two years ago (small pilot, two grades)
we didn't filter at home.  Now, we are considering it as it has expanded to
over 500 students.  We used Securly last school year, but have not been too
pleased with them (off-list if you have questions).

We use our M86 WFR in-house and it works well so maybe we'll set it as a
proxy server if we can for off-site.

That being said, we filter VERY little.  Basically, just adult content.
 Everything else is open.


*Larry Dougher*
Chief Information Officer
Information Technology Services <>
Windsor Southeast Supervisory Union <>
127 State Street, Windsor, VT 05089
Email <[log in to unmask]> | Google+ <> | Twitter
<> | LinkedIn
<> | (802) 674-8336

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Bob Wickberg <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Well, count us as foolish, I guess.  We do have a Fortigate, though, and
> there are a couple of ways to get it done with that.  If the device is a
> PC, you can use the Forticlient.  For other devices (we're going 1:1 with
> Chromebooks), you could set it up as a proxy server, and if you can
> enforce the use of it, you can filter just as effectively off campus as
> on.  I tested it, it seemed to work, but was a pain in the neck if you
> want to secure the proxy server somehow.  If you wanted to leave it as an
> open proxy server, and figure the whole world won't bother to use it even
> if they find it, because its filtering content, then it was perfectly
> transparent to the user.
> I suppose I should add that the firmware on the Fortinet is currently
> version 4, not the latest, because the thing has been maxed out on CPU
> utiization, and I didn't want to introduce anything that was probably more
> feature rich, but perhaps used more cycles as a result.  I'm buying a
> faster one this summer.  So maybe it's even better now.
> In the end, we're planning on holding parent information sessions, and the
> kids won't get to take the machines home until their parents have come in
> to a meeting and heard  from us what we consider their responsibility in
> this venture to be, and the Principal decided that was enough.
> Bob Wickberg
> Technology Coordinator
> Brattleboro Union High School District # 6
> 802-451-3418
> School Information Technology Discussion <[log in to unmask]> writes:
> >Hi, our goal here is to have content filtering available on devices that
> >go home with students for 1:1.  There are several options including apps,
> >appliances, cloud solutions, etc.
> >
> >
> >Are any schools providing this currently, or is this considered the
> >responsibility of parents?  I think the latter is somewhat foolish, given
> >that we know parents are generally not capable of modifying router
> >settings on home internet, or to keeping an eye on what students are
> >doing on their devices at all times.  If there is a problem, the school
> >will likely be blamed, as it is providing the device.
> >
> >
> >We are considering the Fortiguard/Fortinet platform for UTM/Content
> >Filtering or the Sophos product.  Any thoughts, and who is doing what?
> >
> >
> >Craig Donnan, MA
> >Systems Administrator
> >Washington West Supervisory Union
> >340 Mad River Park, Suite 7
> >Waitsfield, VT 05673
> >[ tel:802-496-2272%20x120 ]802-496-2272 x120
> >fax: [ tel:802-496-6515 ]802-496-6515
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >[ ] Search  the SCHOOL-IT
> >Archive
> >
> >[ ] Manage your
> >Subscription to SCHOOL-IT
> >