Print

Print


On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 06:46:09 -0600, Marc Chrusch <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Dismissed with prejudice:
>http://www.ksl.com/?sid=31684608&nid=148&s_cid=rss-extlink

Extreme prejudice.  Beautiful.


>"""""""""""""""""""""""
>"It is undeniable that Alta's snowboard policy bans only snowboards
>from Alta, not people. It is an equipment restriction only," he wrote.
>
>Benson said the case failed because there is no law to support it,
>and the plaintiffs' view of the 14th Amendment is "misplaced and mistaken."
>
>"The equal protection clause is not a general fairness law that
>allows everyone who feels discriminated against to bring an action in
>federal court," he wrote.
>
>"There are many forums plaintiffs can resort to in an attempt to
>accomplish their goal of snowboarding down the Baldy Chutes at Alta.
>Seeking an injunction from this court is not one of them."
>""""""""""""""""""""""
>
>-m1
>
>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.
>
>To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.

To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html