On 1/21/2015 8:34 PM, roger Klinger wrote:
> “I don’t think it’s unreasonable for someone to ask the question ‘are 
> taxpayers getting a fair term?’” Hoffer said.

The leases were negotiated in good faith by the ski areas and the State 
of Vermont, and last a good long time past today. Those quoted in the 
story as saying there's nothing the state can do to change it are correct.

The article sidesteps - though it implies - the added value in revenue 
to Vermont in the form of local taxes (real estate, rooms and meals, 
sales). Considering the state as a whole these almost certainly more 
than offset the decline in relative value of the lease payments - which 
are due, as much as anything, to inflation.

What I find most alarminf is the comments - which, while well meaning, 
are wildly ignorant of both law and economics. If the State of Vermont 
starts reneging on deals it agreed to, God help it.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont.

To unsubscribe, visit