$towe has multiple snow-boards scattered about the hill that Scott and/or others visit daily and take readings from. Not sure how recognized the standard is but I reckon multiple aspects and elevations are included and wind exposure considered.. On Dec 20, 2016 9:37 PM, "Mark P. Renson" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: Who's closest to using to using some sorta' recognized measurement standard? .....such as whatever the National Weather Service uses or the AAA SWAG (Snow, Weather, Avalanche Guidelines). Mark P. Renson On Tuesday, December 20, 2016 9:19 PM, Iski Stowe <[log in to unmask]> wrote: Running into corner with tail between legs. On Dec 20, 2016 7:11 AM, "Justin Woods" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 12:15:50 -0500, Iski Stowe <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >I skied Stowe yesterday and based on what I skied I have to say the Sbush >report is accurate. Lemme get this straight: you're verifying the accuracy of a S'bush report with a $t'oh report? Bad Liver Grin plays a straight snow report -- lleh, it's their schtick; S'bush exaggerates. Ain't no way that ridge varies in snow depth that much, from Stark to Lincoln. Lincoln to Mansfield, however, can vary quite a bit. All you have to do is compare stake depths. --justin - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont. To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/ skivt-l.html <http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont. To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont. To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SkiVt-L is brought to you by the University of Vermont. To unsubscribe, visit http://list.uvm.edu/archives/skivt-l.html