Hi Mat,

When we started to build our own reacors (ceramic outer/ GCT inner) , after an initial trial and error period we decided on ceramic tubes made of Alsint 99.7. This stuff is rated up to temperatures of 1800C.  Seems like overkill but worth it. Once they have been run in (conditioned) their CO background levels are about 200 mV.

Lower spec ceramic tubes such as PYT (rated to just 1400 C) may produce higher background levels and are more likely to deposit weird and wonderful reaction products in then hot zone.

Hope this helps.



Prof. Dr W Meier-Augenstein, CChem, FRSC
Stable Isotope Forensics & Analytical Sciences

Robert Gordon University
School of Pharmacy and Life Sciences
The Ian Wood Building
Garthdee Road
AB10 7GJ

E-mail:   [log in to unmask]
From: Stable Isotope Geochemistry <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Matthew Lachniet <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: 11 January 2017 18:05:50
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [ISOGEOCHEM] Glassy carbon tubes and high CO backgrounds on a TC/EA

Hi all,

I have a question for TC/EA users.

Over the past four weeks I've been resurrecting from the dead my TC/EA for water analysis after no use for three years.

The last major issue among a long list of them is that I've experienced very high CO backgrounds (28/29/30) of >500 mV that don't decrease over time. H2 backgrounds are very low to be essentially negligible. As I understand it from the ISOGEOCHEM archives, the glassy carbon tube (GCT) can react with the ceramic tube to produce CO and Al2. Indeed, when I removed the GCT, which has only seen about 20 water injections since installation, the hot zone had large amounts of reaction products, and I found ash particles in my bottom feed adapter.

My question is: how can the generation of CO be avoided? Both the ceramic tube and the GCT are new, and I had the same results with an old ceramic tube/new GCT combo. The high backgrounds are preventing usable data for d18O, but the d2H data are fine. Both tubes are straight and have no bends or deformities that would cause contact between them.

Other background: the Helium supply is clean. Backgrounds are very low when I turn on He dilution in the ConFlo, and backgrounds disappear when I close the needle valve to mass spec, so I'm pretty sure the CO is coming from the TC/EA. I have done extensive leak testing and found none. I've baked out the GC at 150+ degrees many times with no appreciable effect on backgrounds. The high backgrounds start to appear when reactor temperature is above 1300 C. Though I don't have all the specs off the top of my head, the parameters for He flow rate are the same as previously successful runs. I've removed and reset the GCT/ceramic tube combo about three times to ensure there wasn't some leak, and each time the high backgrounds return.

Any advice would be appreciated.




This email has been scanned for spam and viruses by Proofpoint Essentials. Click here<> to report this email as spam.


Robert Gordon University is the top university for graduate jobs in the UK HESA July 2015

Robert Gordon University, a Scottish charity registered under charity number SC 013781.

This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Robert Gordon University. Thank you.