Print

Print


People argue in lengthand ask questions that were actually all addressed in many articles and videosI sent before at various times.
The biggest problemabout mandatory vaccines in my mind is that you can’t trust the government to forceinjections on people – on Jan 23 this year I sent details of how an Italian labdemonstrated that the vaccine samples they analyzed turned out to be some SCARYMYSTERY SHOT!

In the same email, Ialso gave info on 2016 US law that allows the government to legally force drugsand "medical devices" (think microchips, nano-dust/smart-dust)WITHOUT INFORMED CONSENT.  What’s the implicationof this law in combination with mandatory vaccination?

That email alsocontained loads of other important info, that I highly urge people toread.  If you don't find it in your email, please read it on the listarchive:

https://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1901&L=SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE&P=33900

I previously alsosent evidence of how antigens from human pregnancy hormone were spiked into thetetanus vaccines given to women & girls specifically of child-bearing age,in a number of third world countries (that we know of).  And yes, Bill Gates’ foundation has been atthe forefront of promoting these antifertility tetanus shots, specially forgirls, using WHO programs.

Autism.  The authors who wrote the paper thatsupposedly discredited Wakefield on vaccine-autism link, one of them subsequentlybecame a whistleblower, admitting how they cherrypicked and manipulated data,because otherwise their large dataset would have validated Wakefield’sconclusions.  I sent link to that before.

A government expert publiclytestified that vaccines DON'T cause autism—then privately told DOJ lawyers thatthey CAN, and DO, cause autism. They promptly fired him (in 2007) as theirexpert witness, and continued to use his old testimony to claim vaccines DON'Tcause autism.  http://fullmeasure.news/news/cover-story/the-vaccination-debate

And no, it’s notjust due to improved diagnosis.  Now itseems every elementary class has at least one obviously autistic child.  It didn’t use to be like that.

Do vaccines savelives?  We’ve been taught that it’s thevaccines that prevented many childhood deaths and disabilities when they wereintroduced.  But they achieve suchstatistic by showing ONLY the history starting just before the vaccineintroduction.  When the view is extendedto begin from early 20th century, then it’s clear the DEATH RATES ofall these childhood diseases’ were steadily dropping PRIOR TO the vaccines, dueto improvements in hygiene, nutrition, and cleaner drinking water, etc.  See two charts I just grabbed from theinternet, but they’re in more authoritative publications too:

https://yuzustudios.com/a/vaccination-liberation-information-yufl435-4304.html

http://barbshealthblog.blogspot.com/2017/02/some-facts-about-polio-that-cdc-wishes.html

A review article in thejournal Pediatrics from 2000, titled: Annual Summary of Vital Statistics: Trends in the Health of AmericansDuring the 20th Century, concludes: “Thus vaccination does not accountfor the impressive declines in mortality seen in the first half of the century.”(p. 1315)
But vaccines did dramaticallyreduce the INCIDENCE of childhood infectious diseases.  The problem is, is that necessarily a goodthing?  Leaving aside all the dangersposed by adjuvants, preservatives, contaminant genetic material from organismsused for vaccine preparation (including their viruses), etc etc., seriousquestions are raised about the problematic paradigm of overstimulating theantibody pathway (as opposed to the cellular pathway) of immunity during infantstage when nature seems to intend the child's own antibody pathway to remaindormant while the body learns to distinguish self from others, and threats fromnon-threats.
Additionally, scientists are just now discovering that somecommon childhood diseases, having co-evolved with humans over eons, whileposing some threat to an otherwise unhealthy child, is also actually helping toreduce future serious illnesses such as cancer, so they may well have apositive role in our biology. 
Maggie
 

 

    On Wednesday, March 13, 2019, 5:00:28 AM GMT+1, SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE automatic digest system <[log in to unmask]> wrote:  
 
 SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Digest - 11 Mar 2019 to 12 Mar 2019 (#2019-57)#yiv1756025819 body {font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;color:#000000;}#yiv1756025819 td {font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;color:#000000;}#yiv1756025819 p {font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;color:#000000;}#yiv1756025819 a {font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;font-weight:bold;color:#3366CC;text-decoration:none;}#yiv1756025819 h2 {font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:17px;font-weight:bold;color:#CC0033;}#yiv1756025819 h3 {font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:16px;font-weight:bold;color:#3366CC;}
|  |  |   |



| 
| 
SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE Digest - 11 Mar 2019 to 12 Mar 2019 (#2019-57)

Table of contents:
   
   - Bill Gates on Vaccines & population control (5)
   - Evidence and science that support vaccine exemptions (3)
   - Help build our People’s Green New Deal campaign
   - Revamping science: Making room for more voices
   
   
   - Bill Gates on Vaccines & population control      
      - Bill Gates on Vaccines & population control (03/12)      
From: Mitchel Cohen <[log in to unmask]>
      - Re: Bill Gates on Vaccines & population control (03/12)      
From: Mitchel Cohen <[log in to unmask]>
      - Re: Bill Gates on Vaccines & population control (03/12)      
From: Steve Nadel <[log in to unmask]>
      - Re: Bill Gates on Vaccines & population control (03/12)      
From: Mitchel Cohen <[log in to unmask]>
      - Re: Bill Gates on Vaccines & population control (03/12)      
From: Mitchel Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

   - Evidence and science that support vaccine exemptions      
      - Re: Evidence and science that support vaccine exemptions (03/12)      
From: Mitchel Cohen <[log in to unmask]>
      - Re: Evidence and science that support vaccine exemptions (03/12)      
From: Mandi Smallhorne <[log in to unmask]>
      - Re: Evidence and science that support vaccine exemptions (03/12)      
From: David Barouh <[log in to unmask]>

   - Help build our People’s Green New Deal campaign      
      - Help build our People’s Green New Deal campaign (03/12)      
From: Phil Gasper <[log in to unmask]>

   - Revamping science: Making room for more voices      
      - Revamping science: Making room for more voices (03/12)      
From: Phil Gasper <[log in to unmask]>

 |

 |



| 
Browse the SCIENCE-FOR-THE-PEOPLE online archives.
 | 

 |

I was wondering what people here think of this TED speech by Bill Gates,in which he lauds new vaccines for population control .... 



 The Fight AgainstMonsanto's Roundup: The Politics of Pesticides (SkyHorse, 2019),authored by Mitchel Cohen, is now available at bookstores everywhere!Please click on link to learn more.

Forgot the link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vzFeiKH1jQ

At 01:31 AM 3/12/2019, you wrote:

I was wondering what people herethink of this TED speech by Bill Gates, in which he lauds new vaccinesfor population control .... 



 The Fight AgainstMonsanto's Roundup: The Politics of Pesticides (SkyHorse, 2019),authored by Mitchel Cohen, is now available at bookstores everywhere!Please click on link to learn more.

Here's some robust evidence (only 30 percent or so of what has beengathered):

This is all of the research on vaccinations. ALL OF THESE STUDIES AREPUBLISHED, LEGITIMATE STUDIES ON PUBMED which is a governmentdatabase.

Vaccines and Autism 

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878266/ 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21623535 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25377033 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24995277 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145534 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21058170 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22099159 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364648/ 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17454560 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19106436 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3774468/ 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3697751/ 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21299355 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21907498 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11339848 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17674242 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21993250 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15780490 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12933322 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16870260

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19043938

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12142947

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24675092



Causal relationship between vaccine induced immunity andautism

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12849883



Subtle DNA changes and the overuse of vaccines in autism
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364648/



Vaccine and Autism- a New Scientific Review
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/vaccines-and-autism-a-new-scientific-review/



Summary of previous Journal of Immunology
http://danmurphydc.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/AR-10-12-rata-AUTISM-VACCINE.pdf



Autism and Resulting Medical Conditions:
http://www.tacanow.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/autism-studies-april-2008.pdf



Mercury toxic encephalopathy manifesting with clinical symptoms ofregressive autistic disorders.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17454560



Relation of mercury to high autism rates in boys
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16264412



Elevated levels of measles in children with Autism
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12849883



Abnormal MMR antibodies in children with autism
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145534



Tylenol, MMR and Autism - A parent survey study
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18445737



A Positive Association found between Autism Prevalence andChildhood Vaccination
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/tandf/uteh/2011/00000074/00000014/art00002?token=004c170388ee06a6e5865462431636f5720415d23763c247b5e4e26634a492f2530332976261



Peer reviewed study on fetal cell contamination with retro virusassociated with autism and cancer
http://www.globalresearch.ca/new-study-in-journal-of-public-health-finds-autism-and-cancer-related-to-human-fetal-dna-in-vaccines/5402912



Study documentation- Dr Deisher
http://www.ms.academicjournals.org/article/article1409245960_Deisher%20et%20al.pdf



Autism and mercury poisoning
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11339848



Hypothesis: conjugate vaccines may predispose children to autismspectrum disorders
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21993250



Rise in autism coincides with rise in vaccines
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21623535



A two-phase study evaluating the relationship betweenThimerosal-containing vaccine administration and the risk for an autismspectrum disorder diagnosis in the United States
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878266/


Elevated levels of measles antibodies in children with autism. -PubMed - NCBI
Pediatr Neurol. 2003 Apr;28(4):292-4. Research Support, Non-U.S.Gov't
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov


••••••••••••••••
A study published in the Journal of Biomedical Sciences determined thatthe autoimmunity to the central nervous system may play a causal role inautism. Researchers discovered that because many autistic childrenharbour elevated levels of measles antibodies, they should conduct aserological study of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) and myelin basic protein(MBP) autoantibodies. They used serum samples of 125 autistic childrenand 92 controlled children. Their analysis showed a significant increasein the level of MMR antibodies in autistic children. The study concludesthat the autistic children had an inappropriate or abnormal antibodyresponse to MMR. The study determined that autism could be a result froman atypical measles infection that produces neurological symptoms in somechildren. The source of this virus could be a variant of MV, or it couldbe the MMR vaccine.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145534


•••••••••••••••••••

   
IMPORTANT- 

Package inserts: http://www.immunize.org/fda/

Ingredients:https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/b/excipient-table-2.pdf

Supreme Court declares vaccines unavoidably unsafe:https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-152.pdf

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act legislation (renders manufactures100% of any & all liability):https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/house-bill/5546

VAERS:https://vaers.hhs.gov/index

National Compensation Court website (note the $4 billion paid out comesfrom tax payers):https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/data/

Detox baths:https://www.howhesraised.net/2016/11/the-beginners-guide-to-detox-baths-for-kids/

Vaccine requirements for work/school by state:http://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx

Vit K package insert: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2003/012223Orig1s039Lbl.pdf

People who should not be vaccinated:

https://www.thefamilythathealstogether.com/vaccine-contraindications-six-people-not-vaccinated/

   
Lawsuit determines that federally required safety studies have not beenperformed in 30 years:

http://icandecide.org/government/ICAN-HHS-Stipulated-Order-July-2018.pdf

Fetal Cells & Vaccine Contaminates-

   
Fetal cells:http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/new-fetal-cell-line-from-live-abortion-emerges-for-vaccine-production/

More on fetal cells:https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=396109597402989&id=272455363101747

20%-36% of cell lines scientists are using are contaminated ormisidentified:https://www.statnews.com/2016/07/21/studies-wrong-cells/

Still going to vaccinate? Let's hope that you are getting real vaccines-- not alcohol & cat saliva! :http://www.wandtv.com/story/33272117/doctor-concocts-his-own-vaccines-with-cat-saliva-state-says

SV40 cancer virus that infected 98 million Americans in the poliovaccine:http://www.sv40foundation.org

Development of vaccines from aborted fetuses:https://cogforlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/farnsworthvaccines.pdf

DNA mutations from fetal cell lines in vaccines:http://soundchoice.org/research/

WALVAX2 (fetal cells):

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/25803132/

   
Ethics behind WALVAX2:

http://ethicalresearch.net/positions/the-ethics-of-the-walvax-2-cell-strain/

   
PBS on how vital fetal cells are for vaccine development: 

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/medical-researchers-say-fetal-tissue-remains-essential

Vaccine Failure & Shedding- 

   
Mumps outbreak -- all vaccinated:http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_57276bc7e4b0b49df6abc402

Measles outbreak in a fully immunized school: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3821823

Measles outbreak among the vaccinated:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8053748

New York measles outbreak linked to vaccinated:http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/02/27/cid.ciu105

Vaccinated child responsible for measles outbreak in British Columbia:http://www.eurosurveillance.org/images/dynamic/EE/V18N49/art20649.pdf

Mumps outbreak in Netherlands linked to those vaccinated:http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/20/4/13-1681_article

Vaccinated student in Cali diagnosed with mumps:http://www.nbcsandiego.com/on-air/as-seen-on/Cal-State-San-Marcos-Student-Diagnosed-With-Mumps-395189031.html

What's shedding? :http://insidevaccines.com/wordpress/2008/02/24/secondary-transmission-%EF%BB%BFthe-short-and-sweet-about-live-virus-vaccine-shedding/comment-page-1/

98% vaccinated in pertussis outbreak: http://www.activistpost.com/2015/02/98-vaccinated-involved-in-whooping.html

Vaccine-related polio outbreak in Syria 2017:https://www.statnews.com/2017/06/08/polio-outbreak-syria-who/

More vaccine failure -- pertussis outbreak in vaccinated children: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/22/2/pdfs/15-0325.pdf

Pertussis outbreak in San Diego -- 621 people & 85% were vaccinated-- MORE vaccine failure: http://www.kpbs.org/news/2014/jun/12/immunized-people-getting-whooping-cough/

Largest measles epidemic in North America in the last decade occurred in2011 in Quebec where 1 & 2 dose vaccine coverage among children 3years of age were 95%-97%:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/23264672/

Hib outbreak -- 363/443 (82%) were vaccinated: http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/188/4/481.full

The Emerging risks of live virus & virus vectored vaccines:http://www.nvic.org/CMSTemplates/NVIC/pdf/Live-Virus-Vaccines-and-Vaccine-Shedding.pdf

What's shedding? :http://insidevaccines.com/wordpress/2008/02/24/secondary-transmission-%EF%BB%BFthe-short-and-sweet-about-live-virus-vaccine-shedding/comment-page-1/

Small Pox vaccine sheds to infant from parent (military personnel):http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSN1744524120070518

Everyone infected in this whooping cough outbreak was up to date onvaccinations:http://fox13now.com/2015/03/27/19-kids-in-summit-co-diagnosed-with-whooping-cough-despite-being-up-to-date-on-vaccinations/

& this outbreak too:http://myfox8.com/2015/12/18/13-cases-of-whooping-cough-confirmed-in-davie-county-schools/

Even the CDC suggests that the vaccinated are an asymptomatic reservoirfor infection:http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/6/5/00-0512_article

Mumps outbreak in Netherlands linked to those vaccinated with the MMRtwice: http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/20/4/13-1681_article

Pertussis outbreak in California -"Our unvaccinated & undervaccinated population did not appear tocontribute significantly to the increased rate of clinical pertussis.Surprisingly, the highest incidence of disease was among previouslyvaccinated children aged 8–12 years.":http://m.cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/54/12/1730.long?view=long&pmid=22423127

Measles outbreak in a fully immunized population: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3821823

49% of children vaccinated STILL got pertussis:https://www.cdc.gov/pertussis/downloads/pertuss-surv-report-2016-provisional.pdf

You may be surprised to learn that fully vaccinated children & adultscan still be infected, paralyzed & transmit polio. Here are two casesin particular that may grab your interest- 

"Outbreak of paralytic poliomyelitis in Oman: evidence forwidespread transmission among fully vaccinated children" :http://www.popline.org/node/315407#.dpuf

 "Oral polio vaccine-associated paralysis in achild despite previous immunization with inactivated vaccine." :http://www.virology.ws/2014/10/08/oral-polio-vaccine-associated-paralysis-in-a-child-despite-previous-immunization-with-inactivated-virus/

Mutant strains of polio vaccine now causing more paralysis than wildpolio:

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2017/06/28/534403083/mutant-strains-of-polio-vaccine-now-cause-more-paralysis-than-wild-polio

   
Polio vaccine causing polio again:

https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/26/health/polio-papua-new-guinea-bn/index.html

   
Polio vaccine contaminated with HFM virus:

Herd Immunity
http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2012/02/18/the-deadly-impossibility-of-herd-immunity-through-vaccination-by-dr-russell-blaylock/

The term, ‘herd immunity’, was coined by researcher, A W Hedrich,after he’d studied the epidemiology of measles in USA between 1900-1931.His study published in the May, 1933 American Journal of Epidemiologyconcluded that when 68% of children younger than 15 yrs old had becomeimmune to measles via infection, measles epidemics ceased. For severalreasons, this natural, pre-vaccine herd immunity differed greatly fromtoday’s vaccine ‘herd immunity’.1,2

When immunity was derived from natural infection, a much smallerproportion of the population needed to become immune to show the herdeffect; compare the 68% measles immunity required for natural herdimmunity to the very high percentages of vaccine uptake deemed necessaryfor measles vaccine ‘herd immunity’. In his ‘Vaccine Safety Manual’, NeilZ Miller cites research which concluded increasing vaccine uptakenecessary for ‘herd immunity’ ranging from “70 to 80 percent of two yearolds in inner cities” in 1991 to “‘close to 100 percent coverage’…with avaccine that is 90 to 98 percent effective.” in 1997. Miller notes that,“When the measles vaccine was introduced in 1963, officials wereconfident that they could eradicate the disease by 1967.”

Subsequently, new dates for eradication were pronounced as 1982, 2000 and2010. Meanwhile, “In 1990, after examining 320 scientific works fromaround the world, 180 European medical doctors concluded that ‘theeradication of measles…would today appear to be an unrealistic goal.’”And in 1984, Professor D. Levy of Johns Hopkins University had already“concluded that if current practices [of suppressing natural immunity]continue, by the year 2050 a large part of the population will be at riskand ‘there could in theory be over 25,000 fatal cases of measles in theU.S.A.’”

Disease-conferred immunity usually lasted a lifetime. As each newgeneration of children contracted the infection, the immunity of thosepreviously infected was renewed due to their continual cyclicalre-exposure to the disease; except for newly-infected children and thefew individuals who’d never had the disease or been exposed to it, the‘herd immunity’ of the entire population was maintained at alltimes.

Vaccine ‘herd immunity’ is hit-and-miss; outbreaks of disease sometimeserupt in those who follow recommended vaccine schedules. If they doactually “immunize”, vaccines provide only short-term immunity so, in anattempt to maintain ‘herd immunity’, health authorities hold ‘cattledrives’ to round up older members of the ‘herd’ for administration ofbooster shots. And on it goes, to the point that, now, it’s recommendedwe accept cradle-to-grave shots of vaccine against pertussis, a diseasewhich still persists after more than sixty years of widespread use of thevaccine.

Russell Blaylock, MD remarks, “One of the grand lies of the vaccineprogram is the concept of “herd immunity”. In fact, vaccines for mostAmericans declined to non-protective levels within 5 to 10 years of thevaccines. This means that for the vast majority of Americans, as well asothers in the developed world, herd immunity doesn’t exist and hasn’t forover 60 years.”3

In the pre-vaccine era, newborns could receive antibodies againstinfectious diseases from their mothers who had themselves been infectedas children and re-exposed to the diseases later in life. Today’s babiesborn to mothers who were vaccinated and never exposed to these diseasesdo not receive these antibodies. In direct contrast to fear mongeringdisease “facts” and ‘herd immunity’ theories related by Public Health,most of today’s babies are more vulnerable than babies of the pre-vaccineera.

References:
1. “Monthly estimates of the child population ‘susceptible’ to measles,1900-1931, Baltimore, Maryland”; A W Hedrich; American Journal ofEpidemiology; May 1933 – Oxford University Press.

2. ‘Vaccine Safety Manual’ by Neil Z Miller; New Atlantean Press; 2008,2009; pg 152.

3. Ibid; pgs 16-17.

https://www.facebook.com/axshlexy/posts/10154130529699126

"Q: Doesn't herd immunity protect mostpeople?

A: Herd immunity (or community immunity) is asituation in which, through vaccination or prior illness, a sufficientproportion of a population is immune to an infectious disease, making itsspread from person to person unlikely. Even individuals not vaccinated(such as newborns and those with chronic illnesses) are typicallyprotected because the disease has little opportunity to spread withintheir community. Since pertussis spreads so easily, vaccine protectiondecreases over time, and acellular pertussis vaccines may not preventcolonization (carrying the bacteria in your body without getting sick) orspread of the bacteria, we can't rely on herd immunity to protect peoplefrom pertussis."<https://www.cdc.gov/pertussis/about/faqs.html#increasing>


Questions to ask your doctor/ped regarding vaccinations:


Question-1: If measles vaccines confer measles immunity, then why doalready-vaccinated children have anything to fear from a measlesoutbreak?

Question-2: If vaccines work so well, then why did Merck virologists filea False Claims Act with the U.S. government, describing the astonishingscientific fraud of how Merck faked its vaccine results to trick theFDA?

Question-3: If vaccines don’t have any links to autism, then why did atop CDC scientist openly confess to the CDC committing scientific fraudby selectively omitting clinical trial data after the fact in order toobscure an existing link between vaccines and autism?

Question-4: If mercury is a neurotoxic chemical, then why is it stillbeing injected into children and pregnant women via vaccines? Why doesthe vaccine industry refuse to remove all the mercury from vaccines inthe interests of protecting children from mercury?

Question-5: If vaccines are so incredibly safe, then why does the vaccineindustry need absolute legal immunity from all harm caused by itsproducts?

Question-6: If vaccines work so well to prevent disease, then why do somevaccines (like the chickenpox vaccine) openly admit that they can causethe spread of chickenpox?

Question-7: If vaccines are so great for public health, then why do thesehistorical public health charts show nearly all the declines ininfectious disease taking place BEFORE vaccines arrived on thescene?

Question-8: If vaccines are perfectly safe, then why did at least 13people recently die in Italy after being vaccinated?

Question-9: If vaccines are so trustworthy, then why did a pro-vaccinegroup in Africa recently discover ­ to its shock and horror ­ thatvaccines being given to young African women were secretly laced withabortion chemicals? 

Question-10: If vaccines are backed by solid science, then why do somevaccine inserts openly admit they are backed by no clinicaltrials?

Question-11: If vaccines are so safe, then why does this vaccine insertadmit that the Gardasil vaccine causes “acute respiratory illness” inbabies who consume the breast milk of mothers who have beenvaccinated?

Question-12: If vaccines are so safe, then why does this Gardasil insertsheet admit that the vaccine causes “seizure-like activity, headache,fever, nausea and dizziness” and can even cause those injected with thevaccine to lose consciousness and fall, resulting in injury?

Question-13: If vaccines are backed by so much “science” then why do theyfrequently admit there really aren’t any studies of the vaccine for thevery groups of people who are often injected with it?

Question-14: If vaccines are so safe to give to pregnant women, then whydo the vaccine insert sheets openly admit most of them have never beentested for safety in pregnant women? In fact, this vaccine admits “theeffects of the vaccine in foetal development are unknown.”Question-15: Ifvaccines are so safe to be injected into the bodies of children andpregnant women, then why do their own insert sheets readily admit theyare manufactured with a cocktail of toxic chemical ingredients including“foetal bovine serum?” (The blood serum of aborted baby cows.)

Question-16: If vaccines achieve absolute immunity, then why are as manyas 97 percent of children struck by infectious disease already vaccinatedagainst that disease?

Question-17: If vaccines are totally safe and effective, then why didthis five-year-old girl recently die from the very strain of flu she wasjust vaccinated against?

Question-18: If the mainstream media claims to report honest, unbiasedinformation about vaccines, then why was there a total nationwideblackout on the news of the CDC whistle-blower admitting vaccines arelinked to autism?


Doctors who explain clearly why vaccines aren't safe or effective.
1. Dr. Nancy Banks -http://bit.ly/1Ip0aIm


2. Dr. Russell Blaylock -http://bit.ly/1BXxQZL


3. Dr. Shiv Chopra -http://bit.ly/1gdgh1s


4. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny -http://bit.ly/1MPVbjx


5. Dr. Suzanne Humphries -http://bit.ly/17sKDbf


6. Dr. Larry Palevsky -http://bit.ly/1LLEjf6


7. Dr. Toni Bark -http://bit.ly/1CYM9RB


8. Dr. Andrew Wakefield -http://bit.ly/1MuyNzo


9. Dr. Meryl Nass -http://bit.ly/1DGzJsc


10. Dr. Raymond Obomsawin -http://bit.ly/1G9ZXYl


11. Dr. Ghislaine Lanctot -http://bit.ly/1MrVeUL


12. Dr. Robert Rowen -http://bit.ly/1SIELeF


13. Dr. David Ayoub -http://bit.ly/1SIELve


14. Dr. Boyd Haley PhD -http://bit.ly/1KsdVby


15. Dr. Rashid Buttar -http://bit.ly/1gWOkL6


16. Dr. Roby Mitchell -http://bit.ly/1gdgEZU


17. Dr. Ken Stoller -http://bit.ly/1MPVqLI


18. Dr. Mayer Eisenstein -http://bit.ly/1LLEqHH


19. Dr. Frank Engley, PhD -http://bit.ly/1OHbLDI


20. Dr. David Davis -http://bit.ly/1gdgJwo


21. Dr Tetyana Obukhanych -http://bit.ly/16Z7k6J


22. Dr. Harold E Buttram -http://bit.ly/1Kru6Df


23. Dr. Kelly Brogan -http://bit.ly/1D31pfQ


24. Dr. RC Tent -http://bit.ly/1MPVwmu


25. Dr. Rebecca Carley -http://bit.ly/K49F4d


26. Dr. Andrew Moulden -http://bit.ly/1fwzKJu


27. Dr. Jack Wolfson -http://bit.ly/1wtPHRA


28. Dr. Michael Elice -http://bit.ly/1KsdpKA


29. Dr. Terry Wahls -http://bit.ly/1gWOBhd


30. Dr. Stephanie Seneff -http://bit.ly/1OtWxAY


31. Dr. Paul Thomas -http://bit.ly/1DpeXPf


32. Many doctors talking at once -http://bit.ly/1MPVHOv


33. Dr. Richard Moskowitz -http://bit.ly/1OtWG7D


34. Dr. Jane Orient -http://bit.ly/1MXX7pb


35. Dr. Richard Deth -http://bit.ly/1GQDL10


36. Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic -http://bit.ly/1eqiPr5


37. Dr Chris Shaw -http://bit.ly/1IlGiBp


38. Dr. Susan McCreadie -http://bit.ly/1CqqN83


39. Dr. Mary Ann Block -http://bit.ly/1OHcyUX


40. Dr. David Brownstein -http://bit.ly/1EaHl9A


41. Dr. Jayne Donegan -http://bit.ly/1wOk4Zz


42. Dr. Troy Ross -http://bit.ly/1IlGlNH


43. Dr. Philip Incao -http://bit.ly/1ghE7sS


44. Dr. Joseph Mercola -http://bit.ly/18dE38I


45. Dr. Jeff Bradstreet -http://bit.ly/1MaX0cC


46. Dr. Robert Mendelson -http://bit.ly/1JpAEQr


47. Dr Theresa Deisherhttps://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=6Bc6WX33SuE


48. Dr. SamEggertsen-https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8LB-3xkeDAE


Hundreds more doctors testifying that vaccines aren't safe oreffective, in these documentaries....
1. Vaccination - The Silent Epidemic -http://bit.ly/1vvQJ2W


2. The Greater Good -http://bit.ly/1icxh8j


3. Shots In The Dark -http://bit.ly/1ObtC8h


4. Vaccination The Hidden Truth -http://bit.ly/KEYDUh


5. Vaccine Nation -http://bit.ly/1iKNvpU


6. Vaccination - The Truth About Vaccines -http://bit.ly/1vlpwvU


7. Lethal Injection -http://bit.ly/1URN7BJ


8. Bought -http://bit.ly/1M7YSlr


9. Deadly Immunity -http://bit.ly/1KUg64Z


10. Autism - Made in the USA -http://bit.ly/1J8WQN5


11. Beyond Treason -http://bit.ly/1B7kmvt


12. Trace Amounts -http://bit.ly/1vAH3Hv  


13. Why We Don't Vaccinate -http://bit.ly/1KbXhuf

………………………….. 


At 11:26 AM 3/11/2019, you wrote:

Mitchel makes a good point withthe example of fluoridation, but is there really robust evidence of acausal link between some vaccines and autism?

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 11:23 AM Mitchel Cohen<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
   
      - Thanks for these important clarifications as to the AAPS, to Steveand Sigrid. And thanks to Maggie for faising this issue. Steve and Sigridrightly critique only one of Maggie Zhou's links. And even there, thereis indeed a causal relationship between SOME vaccines, containingparticular adjuvants, to autism -- there are of course other so-called"environmental" (meaning pollutant) causes of autism aswell.   
   

      - Just because the proponent of an issue may be a rightwingorganization does not make them wrong about the issue -- although it'susually for the wrong reasons that they're right. Take for instance theJohn Birch Society's longstanding opposition to fluoride in drinkingwater -- which has been exposed by some independent researchers as awaste product of the aluminum industry in the late 1940s and 1950s, notsomething the John Birch Society would touch in their explanations. (TheJBS saw fluoridation as a "Communist plot" by the government,and not as an effluent of the very capitalism that they wereendorsing.)   
   

      - Mitchel    
   
   

      - At 08:45 AM 3/11/2019, Steve Nadel wrote:   
   


      - Thanks Sigrid.  Many people will have my initial reaction tothe name, that it is a "professional" society, i.e. sciencebased,   Here is an excerpt from the Wikipedia entry on AAPS whichfurther elaborates Sigrid's points   
   

      - The association is generally recognized as politicallyconservative orultra-conservative,and its publication advocates a range of scientifically discreditedhypotheses, includingthe belief thatHIV does not cause AIDS, that being gay reduces life expectancy, thatthere is alink between abortion and breast cancer, and that there is acausalrelationship between vaccines and autism.   
   

      - They oppose aboriton, medicare/medicaid and all forms  ofgovernmental health assistance. Here is a link to theWikipedia article    
   
   


      - On Mar 11, 2019, at 2:44 AM, Sigrid Schmalzer<[log in to unmask] > wrote:   
   

      - Hi. The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons also opposesthe Affordable Care Act and socialized medicine more generally. My senseis that the anti-vaxx movement is leaping on this endorsement because theAAPS because it has the appearance of medical authority. Let's be morecritical.   
   

      - Sigrid   

      - On 3/10/19 7:41 PM, Maggie Zhou wrote:   
   


      - There was a congressional hearing last week on the use of force tovaccinate (taking away exemptions).   

      - https://ppjg.me/2019/03/05/hearing-on-the-use-of-force-to-vaccinate-taking-place-now/    
   

      - Two medical associations have come out with statements againstmandatory vaccinations in the past few days, the Association ofAmerican Physicians and Surgeons, and Physicians for InformedConsent.   

      - https://ppjg.me/2019/03/05/medical-doctors-across-the-u-s-speak-out-against-mandatory-vaccination-laws/    
   

      - Here's a well referenced and concise white paper on the evidence& science that support vaccine exemptions.  For those whothink vaccination is supported by science, this is a must read. (I've also sent other links to evidence before, so this adds tothat.)   

      - https://icandecide.org/white-papers/The-Evidence-Science-Support-Vaccine-Exemptions.pdf    
   

      - Meanwhile, governments are doubling down on forcedvaccinations.   
   

      - ABC News is promoting that teens should defy their anti-vaxxerparents' judgement and choose to vaccinate themselves.   

      - https://abc7chicago.com/health/ohio-teen-defies-anti-vaccine-mom-gets-his-shots/5134211/    

      - "in at least 7 states a relatively new legal concept called themature minor doctrine allows teens to petition to make their ownmedical decision."   
   

      - Australian government decided to reduce welfare payments forunvaccinated children, to force poor families to vaccinate:   

      - https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-13/vaccinations-no-jab-no-pay-takes-effect/10169684    
   

      - Maggie

   
      - --    

      - Sigrid Schmalzer   

      - Professor, History Department   

      - University of Massachusetts Amherst   

      - Website:http://sigridschmalzer.org   
   

      - Proud member of the Massachusetts Society of Professors(MSP/MTA/NEA), the union representing faculty and librarians at UMassAmherst, and supporting public education and labor movements everywhere:umassmsp.org   
   

      - Red Revolution, Green Revolution: Scientific Farming in SocialistChina (University of Chicago Press, 2016)   
   

      - Sciencefor the People: Documents from America's Movement of RadicalScientists (University of Massachusetts Press, 2018)   
   

      - Moth and Wasp, Soil and Ocean: Remembering Chinese Scientist Pu Zhelong'sWork for Sustainable Farming (Tilbury House, 2018) -- picturebook

   
      - TheFight AgainstMonsanto's Roundup: The Politics of Pesticides (SkyHorse, 2019),authored by Mitchel Cohen, is now available at bookstores everywhere!Please click on link to learn more.   


 The Fight AgainstMonsanto's Roundup: The Politics of Pesticides (SkyHorse, 2019),authored by Mitchel Cohen, is now available at bookstores everywhere!Please click on link to learn more.



While I was waiting for you to post the link to the video, I did a search on Gates & Vaccines to find out what you were talking about. One item i came up on was a Snopes fact check, that I now see is directly related to this video.
Here is the link https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bill-gates-vaccinations-depopulation/
From the fact checking it is clear Gates has a fairly conventional liberal view on  value of reducing population growth in high birth rate countries & the just path to do so - i.e. improving women’s conditions (infant mortality, reliable income, etc.)  There are many areas where we can debate the relevance of neo-malthusian arguements as solutions to problems (climate, hunger, poverty, etc.)
HOwever, the issue here is not what we think of Gates, the work of his foundation or even the value of given women control over their birth rates.  It is the clear misrepresentation as stated in the Snope fact check, that there is some hidden conspiracy to create/use vaccines to reduce unwanted populations.
Thus this video is another path to a false critique of those in power that may be leftist in rhetoric, but is based on  creating unjustified fear of vaccines and fear of public health measures to increase vaccination (especially in poor countries with challenged public health resources, such as  in Madagascar which is currently reporting nearly 1000 deaths associated with  a measles outbreak)Steve



On Mar 11, 2019, at 10:31 PM, Mitchel Cohen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
I was wondering what people here think of this TED speech by Bill Gates,in which he lauds new vaccines for population control .... 



The Fight AgainstMonsanto's Roundup: The Politics of Pesticides (SkyHorse, 2019),authored by Mitchel Cohen, is now available at bookstores everywhere!Please click on link to learn more.

 

Steve, I don't see how there can be any confusion as to what Gates issaying here. He says, outright, to use vaccines for population control incertain areas of the world.

I agree with you that this is used by rightwing groups, who suddenlyevince caring about Third World populations, but be that as it may, GatesDID say these repugnant things, AND he is a major funder through hisfoundation of such projects.

Like it or not, that's the reality ...

Mitchel


At 03:00 AM 3/12/2019, you wrote:



While I was waiting for you topost the link to the video, I did a search on Gates & Vaccines tofind out what you were talking about. One item i came up on was a Snopesfact check, that I now see is directly related to this video.

Here is the linkhttps://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bill-gates-vaccinations-depopulation/

 From the fact checking it is clear Gates has a fairly conventionalliberal view on  value of reducing population growth in high birthrate countries & the just path to do so - i.e. improving women’sconditions (infant mortality, reliable income, etc.)  There are manyareas where we can debate the relevance of neo-malthusian arguements assolutions to problems (climate, hunger, poverty, etc.)

HOwever, the issue here is not what we think of Gates, the work of hisfoundation or even the value of given women control over their birthrates.  It is the clear misrepresentation as stated in the Snopefact check, that there is some hidden conspiracy to create/use vaccinesto reduce unwanted populations.

Thus this video is another path to a false critique of those in powerthat may be leftist in rhetoric, but is based on  creatingunjustified fear of vaccines and fear of public health measures toincrease vaccination (especially in poor countries with challenged publichealth resources, such as  in Madagascar which is currentlyreporting nearly 1000 deaths associated with  a measlesoutbreak)
Steve




On Mar 11, 2019, at 10:31 PM,Mitchel Cohen<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

I was wondering what people here think of this TED speech by Bill Gates,in which he lauds new vaccines for population control .... 


TheFight AgainstMonsanto's Roundup: The Politics of Pesticides (SkyHorse, 2019),authored by Mitchel Cohen, is now available at bookstores everywhere!Please click on link to learn more.


 The Fight AgainstMonsanto's Roundup: The Politics of Pesticides (SkyHorse, 2019),authored by Mitchel Cohen, is now available at bookstores everywhere!Please click on link to learn more.

Hi again,
OK, I take your point here that in Bill Gates's mind he wanted to usevaccines to save children's lives so that their parents would not want tohave more kids -- a pretty dumb reversal of cause and effect, but okay.Maybe his intentions on that score are okay, even if his plan is nuts.Maybe.

So now we return to the actual arguments -- Bill Gates here was a sidetrip (even though I'm the one who introduced it). There's a differencebetween kids dying from measles in Madagascar and getting measles (orother diseases) here in the U.S., where most people have access to cleandrinking water and sanitation -- and obtain lifetime immunity from havingthat disease as a child.

Mitchel


At 03:00 AM 3/12/2019, Steve Nadel wrote:



While I was waiting for you topost the link to the video, I did a search on Gates & Vaccines tofind out what you were talking about. One item i came up on was a Snopesfact check, that I now see is directly related to this video.

Here is the linkhttps://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bill-gates-vaccinations-depopulation/

 From the fact checking it is clear Gates has a fairly conventionalliberal view on  value of reducing population growth in high birthrate countries & the just path to do so - i.e. improving women’sconditions (infant mortality, reliable income, etc.)  There are manyareas where we can debate the relevance of neo-malthusian arguements assolutions to problems (climate, hunger, poverty, etc.)

HOwever, the issue here is not what we think of Gates, the work of hisfoundation or even the value of given women control over their birthrates.  It is the clear misrepresentation as stated in the Snopefact check, that there is some hidden conspiracy to create/use vaccinesto reduce unwanted populations.

Thus this video is another path to a false critique of those in powerthat may be leftist in rhetoric, but is based on  creatingunjustified fear of vaccines and fear of public health measures toincrease vaccination (especially in poor countries with challenged publichealth resources, such as  in Madagascar which is currentlyreporting nearly 1000 deaths associated with  a measlesoutbreak)
Steve




On Mar 11, 2019, at 10:31 PM,Mitchel Cohen<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

I was wondering what people here think of this TED speech by Bill Gates,in which he lauds new vaccines for population control .... 


TheFight AgainstMonsanto's Roundup: The Politics of Pesticides (SkyHorse, 2019),authored by Mitchel Cohen, is now available at bookstores everywhere!Please click on link to learn more.


 The Fight AgainstMonsanto's Roundup: The Politics of Pesticides (SkyHorse, 2019),authored by Mitchel Cohen, is now available at bookstores everywhere!Please click on link to learn more.

<!--#yiv1756025819 _filtered #yiv1756025819 {font-family:"Cambria Math";panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv1756025819 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv1756025819 {font-family:Verdana;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;} _filtered #yiv1756025819 {font-family:BatangChe;panose-1:2 3 6 9 0 1 1 1 1 1;} _filtered #yiv1756025819 {} _filtered #yiv1756025819 {font-family:"Berlin Sans FB";panose-1:2 14 6 2 2 5 2 2 3 6;}#yiv1756025819 #yiv1756025819 p.yiv1756025819MsoNormal, #yiv1756025819 li.yiv1756025819MsoNormal, #yiv1756025819 div.yiv1756025819MsoNormal {margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;}#yiv1756025819 a:link, #yiv1756025819 span.yiv1756025819MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1756025819 a:visited, #yiv1756025819 span.yiv1756025819MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1756025819 p.yiv1756025819MsoNoSpacing, #yiv1756025819 li.yiv1756025819MsoNoSpacing, #yiv1756025819 div.yiv1756025819MsoNoSpacing {margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;}#yiv1756025819 p.yiv1756025819msonormal0, #yiv1756025819 li.yiv1756025819msonormal0, #yiv1756025819 div.yiv1756025819msonormal0 {margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;}#yiv1756025819 span.yiv1756025819font {}#yiv1756025819 span.yiv1756025819size {}#yiv1756025819 span.yiv1756025819colour {}#yiv1756025819 span.yiv1756025819EmailStyle22 {font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;color:windowtext;}#yiv1756025819 .yiv1756025819MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered #yiv1756025819 {margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}#yiv1756025819 div.yiv1756025819WordSection1 {}-->
Is it correlation or causation? Because you know, the first cell phones were commercialised around 1983 – so was it maybe the advent of mobile communications technology that triggered a rise in autism? Or a significant increase in the popularity of balsamic vinegar, sales of which rose enormously after the late 1980s, round about when the National Child Vaccine  Injury Act was passed? Many, many things can be linked to the rise in incidence of autism over the period 1985 to the present. What is needed is a strong causational link, not correlation.

Of course, by linking it to the NCVIA you are only considering the USA, 5% of the world’s population. In Britain, where the link was first written up, the opposite applies, as far as I know, thanks to the Vaccine Damage Payments Act 1979 which paid out a lump sum to children injured by vaccines, still does, far as I know.

Is there an increase at all? In South Africa, local experts say there’s a clear increase in diagnoses – because of an improvement in access to both primary medical care and to secondary and tertiary care. 

In the States, in a paper published online “in the American Journal of Medical Genetics on July 22, 2015, scientists at Penn State University report their analysis of 11 years of special-education enrollment data on an average of 6.2 million children per year. The researchers found no overall increase in the number of students enrolled in special education. They also found that the increase in students diagnosed with autism was offset by a nearly equal decrease in students diagnosed with other intellectual disabilities that often co-occur with autism. The researchers conclude that the large increase in the prevalence of autism is likely the result of shifting patterns of diagnosis that are complicated by the variability of autism and its overlap with other related disorders.”

That there is no causational link between vaccinations and autism is clear from the zillions of papers Phil has linked. In addition, you might find it interesting to read the work of the original journalist who worked long and hard to reveal the fraud perpetrated by Wakefield, Brian Deer (https://www.bmj.com/content/342/bmj.c5347 ).

Finally, life is full of miniscule risks which we all take in the interests of a generally safe and healthy community. I do so on the roads every day, obeying the agreed rules and stopping at red light, going on green, not knowing if anyone around me has failing brakes or is having a stroke which will send their car crashing into me. I obey the law about safety belts, even though the standard safety belt is not designed for a woman, let alone a short one, and I am therefore likely to be fairly severely injured in an accident. Better than hitting my head on the window, which I’ve done once already. 

We do many things that have risk attached in order to secure a general level of safety for all. When you vaccinate your child, it is not only your child you are making safer, it is all the children and people around that child, especially those with compromised health.

  

Mandi Smallhorne

Freelance science writer

  

From: Science for the People Discussion List <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of David Barouh
Sent: 11 March 2019 09:12 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Evidence and science that support vaccine exemptions

  

So Phil, are you satisfied that the seeming chronological link of rising autism rates and ever more vaccinations is coincidental? And assuming there's really no established link, is this a reason to mandate universal vaccination?

  

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019, at 2:54 PM, Phil Gasper wrote:


Yes, I believe the studies have been discredited. Like everyone on this list, I'm well aware of the commercial pressures on research, but numerous meta studies conducterd by people with no links to the pharmaceutical industry and involving hundreds of thousands of people convinced me. You always have to look at the actual details.

  

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 1:43 PM David Barouh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


  

I suspect that rising autism rates are at least suggestive of a causal link. There's certainly a chronological link, dating back at least to the time that vaccine makers gained their immunity from liability for people damaged by vaccines and the consequent introduction of vaccines for ever more diseases. Can we really believe that studies establishing such a link have supposedly been "discredited," given the commercial bent of so much science these days, and given the commercial milieu in which all this is happening.

  

Much like climate science, the basic premise of which I'm not questioning, but which nonetheless has been hopeless politicized to the point that we are getting exact timeframes for disaster that spans a decade or less, and on the other hand, complete denial of its existence, are we sure that climate science really that advanced? I'm reminded of the Friedman Units, where Journalist Thomas Friedman, a big booster of the 2003 invasion of Iraq would every six months or so comment on that war's progress by saying that the US had "six months to get it right." 

  

The issue is of the government mandating vaccination, i.e. forcing people to undergo a medical procedure violating several of the body's natural defenses, which seems to be a violation of the Fourth, Fifth and probably the Eighth and Ninth, Amendments guaranteeing that people are "secure in their persons," not "deprived of life or liberty," do not have "cruel and unusual punishments inflicted," and are not denied rights "not specifically enumerated." Can anyone deny that vaccines have harmed at least some people? Which means that some people can be harmed, so that forcing people to partake in a sort of Russian Roulette simply cannot be legal or constitutional.

  

  

  

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019, at 1:18 PM, Mitchel Cohen wrote:


I guess it depends, David, on how one defines "robust".  :-)

  

Mitchel

  

At 11:26 AM 3/11/2019, you wrote:

  


Mitchel makes a good point with the example of fluoridation, but is there really robust evidence of a causal link between some vaccines and autism?

  

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 11:23 AM Mitchel Cohen < [log in to unmask]> wrote:

  

Thanks for these important clarifications as to the AAPS, to Steve and Sigrid. And thanks to Maggie for fraising this issue. Steve and Sigrid rightly critique only one of Maggie Zhou's links. And even there, there is indeed a causal relationship between SOME vaccines, containing particular adjuvants, to autism -- there are of course other so-called "environmental" (meaning pollutant) causes of autism as well.

Just because the proponent of an issue may be a rightwing organization does not make them wrong about the issue -- although it's usually for the wrong reasons that they're right. Take for instance the John Birch Society's longstanding opposition to fluoride in drinking water -- which has been exposed by some independent researchers as a waste product of the aluminum industry in the late 1940s and 1950s, not something the John Birch Society would touch in their explanations. (The JBS saw fluoridation as a "Communist plot" by the government, and not as an effluent of the very capitalism that they were endorsing.)

Mitchel 

  

  

At 08:45 AM 3/11/2019, Steve Nadel wrote:

  


Thanks Sigrid.  Many people will have my initial reaction to the name, that it is a "professional" society, i.e. science based,   Here is an excerpt from the Wikipedia entry on AAPS which further elaborates Sigrid's points

The association is generally recognized as politically conservative or ultra-conservative, and its publication advocates a range of scientifically discredited hypotheses, including the belief that HIV does not cause AIDS, that being gay reduces life expectancy, that there is a link between abortion and breast cancer, and that there is a causal relationship between vaccines and autism.

  

They oppose aboriton, medicare/medicaid and all forms  of governmental health assistance. Here is a link to the Wikipedia article 

  


On Mar 11, 2019, at 2:44 AM, Sigrid Schmalzer <[log in to unmask] > wrote:

Hi. The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons also opposes the Affordable Care Act and socialized medicine more generally. My sense is that the anti-vaxx movement is leaping on this endorsement because the AAPS because it has the appearance of medical authority. Let's be more critical.

Sigrid

On 3/10/19 7:41 PM, Maggie Zhou wrote:

  


There was a congressional hearing last week on the use of force to vaccinate (taking away exemptions).

https://ppjg.me/2019/03/05/hearing-on-the-use-of-force-to-vaccinate-taking-place-now/ 

Two medical associations have come out with statements against mandatory vaccinations in the past few days, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, and Physicians for Informed Consent.

https://ppjg.me/2019/03/05/medical-doctors-across-the-u-s-speak-out-against-mandatory-vaccination-laws/ 

Here's a well referenced and concise white paper on the evidence & science that support vaccine exemptions.  For those who think vaccination is supported by science, this is a must read.  (I've also sent other links to evidence before, so this adds to that.)

https://icandecide.org/white-papers/The-Evidence-Science-Support-Vaccine-Exemptions.pdf 

Meanwhile, governments are doubling down on forced vaccinations.

ABC News is promoting that teens should defy their anti-vaxxer parents' judgement and choose to vaccinate themselves.

https://abc7chicago.com/health/ohio-teen-defies-anti-vaccine-mom-gets-his-shots/5134211/ 

"in at least 7 states a relatively new legal concept called the mature minor doctrine allows teens to petition to make their own medical decision."

Australian government decided to reduce welfare payments for unvaccinated children, to force poor families to vaccinate:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-13/vaccinations-no-jab-no-pay-takes-effect/10169684 

Maggie


-- 

Sigrid Schmalzer

Professor, History Department

University of Massachusetts Amherst

Website: http://sigridschmalzer.org

  

Proud member of the Massachusetts Society of Professors (MSP/MTA/NEA), the union representing faculty and librarians at UMass Amherst, and supporting public education and labor movements everywhere: umassmsp.org

Red Revolution, Green Revolution: Scientific Farming in Socialist China (University of Chicago Press, 2016)

  

Science for the People: Documents from America's Movement of Radical Scientists (University of Massachusetts Press, 2018)

  

Moth and Wasp, Soil and Ocean: Remembering Chinese Scientist Pu Zhelong's Work for Sustainable Farming (Tilbury House, 2018) -- picture book



The Fight Against Monsanto's Roundup: The Politics of Pesticides (SkyHorse, 2019), authored by Mitchel Cohen, is now available at bookstores everywhere! Please click on link to learn more.





  
#yiv1756025819 p.yiv1756025819MsoNormal, #yiv1756025819 p.yiv1756025819MsoNoSpacing{margin:0;}#yiv1756025819 p.yiv1756025819MsoNormal, #yiv1756025819 p.yiv1756025819MsoNoSpacing{margin:0;}#yiv1756025819 p.yiv1756025819MsoNormal, #yiv1756025819 p.yiv1756025819MsoNoSpacing{margin:0;}From a random sampling of these links, I could reiterate what I mentioned previously, that autism cases rose many fold and quite rapidly some time after vaccine makers received immunity from liability in the late '80s, following which the sheer number of vaccines administered to children exploded. In my childhood, smallpox and polio were the only two vaccines we received. Most of us went through all the childhood diseases of the time—no big deal. Now, vaccines number many multiples of that, and are administered starting in infancy! 

Two points: Bodies are selectively porous. Foods we ingest passes through the digestive system, i.e. filtered through an elaborate tube we can think of for practical purposes as being still outside the body. The needed materials are then allowed into the body proper and the rest eliminated. Vaccines bypass that elaborate front line of body defenses, with substances you'd never consume on your own being injected directly into the blood stream. Is it really surprising that they can do harm? Didn't the Supreme Court rule that they are "unavoidably unsafe"?

Second: Vaccines (and to a lesser degree antibiotics) are often given credit for the elimination of major diseases, but that credit should belong to the gradual introduction of all the modern public health and sanitation measures we take for granted: indoor running water, hot water, chlorination, refrigeration, heat, air conditioning, garbage collection, food inspections, and on and on. The kings and queens of old didn't have such luxuries. Imagine life without these, but with vaccines and antibiotics; which of these has the greater potential for spread of diseases?

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019, at 2:41 AM, Mitchel Cohen wrote:

Here's some robust evidence (only 30 percent or so of what has beengathered):

This is all of the research on vaccinations. ALL OF THESE STUDIES AREPUBLISHED, LEGITIMATE STUDIES ON PUBMED which is a governmentdatabase.

Vaccines and Autism 

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878266/ 
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21623535  
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25377033 
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24995277  
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145534 
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21058170  
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22099159 
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364648/  
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17454560 
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19106436  
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3774468/ 
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3697751/  
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21299355 
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21907498  
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11339848 
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17674242  
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21993250 
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15780490  
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12933322 
  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16870260

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19043938

  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12142947

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24675092

 

 Causal relationship between vaccine induced immunity andautism

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12849883

 

 Subtle DNA changes and the overuse of vaccines in autism
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364648/

 

 Vaccine and Autism- a New Scientific Review
   http://www.cbsnews.com/news/vaccines-and-autism-a-new-scientific-review/ 

 

 Summary of previous Journal of Immunology
   http://danmurphydc.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/AR-10-12-rata-AUTISM-VACCINE.pdf 

 

 Autism and Resulting Medical Conditions:
   http://www.tacanow.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/autism-studies-april-2008.pdf 

 

 Mercury toxic encephalopathy manifesting with clinical symptoms ofregressive autistic disorders.
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17454560

 

 Relation of mercury to high autism rates in boys
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16264412

 

 Elevated levels of measles in children with Autism
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12849883

 

 Abnormal MMR antibodies in children with autism
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145534

 

 Tylenol, MMR and Autism - A parent survey study
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18445737

 

 A Positive Association found between Autism Prevalence andChildhood Vaccination
   http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/tandf/uteh/2011/00000074/00000014/art00002?token=004c170388ee06a6e5865462431636f5720415d23763c247b5e4e26634a492f2530332976261 

 

 Peer reviewed study on fetal cell contamination with retro virusassociated with autism and cancer
   http://www.globalresearch.ca/new-study-in-journal-of-public-health-finds-autism-and-cancer-related-to-human-fetal-dna-in-vaccines/5402912 

 

 Study documentation- Dr Deisher
   http://www.ms.academicjournals.org/article/article1409245960_Deisher%20et%20al.pdf 

 

 Autism and mercury poisoning
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11339848

 

 Hypothesis: conjugate vaccines may predispose children to autismspectrum disorders
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21993250

 

 Rise in autism coincides with rise in vaccines
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21623535

 

 A two-phase study evaluating the relationship betweenThimerosal-containing vaccine administration and the risk for an autismspectrum disorder diagnosis in the United States
   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878266/

 
 Elevated levels of measles antibodies in children with autism. -PubMed - NCBI
 Pediatr Neurol. 2003 Apr;28(4):292-4. Research Support, Non-U.S.Gov't
   www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 
 ••••••••••••••••
 A study published in the Journal of Biomedical Sciences determined thatthe autoimmunity to the central nervous system may play a causal role inautism. Researchers discovered that because many autistic childrenharbour elevated levels of measles antibodies, they should conduct aserological study of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) and myelin basic protein(MBP) autoantibodies. They used serum samples of 125 autistic childrenand 92 controlled children. Their analysis showed a significant increasein the level of MMR antibodies in autistic children. The study concludesthat the autistic children had an inappropriate or abnormal antibodyresponse to MMR. The study determined that autism could be a result froman atypical measles infection that produces neurological symptoms in somechildren. The source of this virus could be a variant of MV, or it couldbe the MMR vaccine.

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145534

 
 •••••••••••••••••••   
IMPORTANT- 

 Package inserts:   http://www.immunize.org/fda/

  Ingredients:   https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/b/excipient-table-2.pdf 

  Supreme Court declares vaccines unavoidably unsafe:   https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-152.pdf

  National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act legislation (renders manufactures100% of any & all liability):   https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/house-bill/5546

  VAERS:   https://vaers.hhs.gov/index

  National Compensation Court website (note the $4 billion paid out comesfrom tax payers):   https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/data/

  Detox baths:   https://www.howhesraised.net/2016/11/the-beginners-guide-to-detox-baths-for-kids/ 

  Vaccine requirements for work/school by state:   http://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx
 
  Vit K package insert:   https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2003/012223Orig1s039Lbl.pdf 

  People who should not be vaccinated:https://www.thefamilythathealstogether.com/vaccine-contraindications-six-people-not-vaccinated/ 
   
Lawsuit determines that federally required safety studies have not beenperformed in 30 years:
http://icandecide.org/government/ICAN-HHS-Stipulated-Order-July-2018.pdf 

 Fetal Cells & Vaccine Contaminates-

   
Fetal cells:   http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/new-fetal-cell-line-from-live-abortion-emerges-for-vaccine-production/ 

  More on fetal cells:   https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=396109597402989&id=272455363101747 

  20%-36% of cell lines scientists are using are contaminated ormisidentified:   https://www.statnews.com/2016/07/21/studies-wrong-cells/

  Still going to vaccinate? Let's hope that you are getting real vaccines-- not alcohol & cat saliva! :   http://www.wandtv.com/story/33272117/doctor-concocts-his-own-vaccines-with-cat-saliva-state-says 

  SV40 cancer virus that infected 98 million Americans in the poliovaccine:   http://www.sv40foundation.org

  Development of vaccines from aborted fetuses:   https://cogforlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/farnsworthvaccines.pdf 

  DNA mutations from fetal cell lines in vaccines:   http://soundchoice.org/research/

  WALVAX2 (fetal cells):https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/25803132/
   
Ethics behind WALVAX2:
http://ethicalresearch.net/positions/the-ethics-of-the-walvax-2-cell-strain/ 
   
PBS on how vital fetal cells are for vaccine development: 
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/medical-researchers-say-fetal-tissue-remains-essential 

 Vaccine Failure & Shedding-
   
Mumps outbreak -- all vaccinated:   http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_57276bc7e4b0b49df6abc402

  Measles outbreak in a fully immunized school:   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3821823

  Measles outbreak among the vaccinated:   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8053748

  New York measles outbreak linked to vaccinated:   http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/02/27/cid.ciu105
 
  Vaccinated child responsible for measles outbreak in British Columbia:   http://www.eurosurveillance.org/images/dynamic/EE/V18N49/art20649.pdf 

  Mumps outbreak in Netherlands linked to those vaccinated:   http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/20/4/13-1681_article

  Vaccinated student in Cali diagnosed with mumps:   http://www.nbcsandiego.com/on-air/as-seen-on/Cal-State-San-Marcos-Student-Diagnosed-With-Mumps-395189031.html 

  What's shedding? :   http://insidevaccines.com/wordpress/2008/02/24/secondary-transmission-%EF%BB%BFthe-short-and-sweet-about-live-virus-vaccine-shedding/comment-page-1/ 

  98% vaccinated in pertussis outbreak:   http://www.activistpost.com/2015/02/98-vaccinated-involved-in-whooping.html 

  Vaccine-related polio outbreak in Syria 2017:   https://www.statnews.com/2017/06/08/polio-outbreak-syria-who/

  More vaccine failure -- pertussis outbreak in vaccinated children:   https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/22/2/pdfs/15-0325.pdf

  Pertussis outbreak in San Diego -- 621 people & 85% were vaccinated-- MORE vaccine failure:   http://www.kpbs.org/news/2014/jun/12/immunized-people-getting-whooping-cough/ 

  Largest measles epidemic in North America in the last decade occurred in2011 in Quebec where 1 & 2 dose vaccine coverage among children 3years of age were 95%-97%:   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/23264672/

  Hib outbreak -- 363/443 (82%) were vaccinated:   http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/188/4/481.full

  The Emerging risks of live virus & virus vectored vaccines:   http://www.nvic.org/CMSTemplates/NVIC/pdf/Live-Virus-Vaccines-and-Vaccine-Shedding.pdf 

  What's shedding? :   http://insidevaccines.com/wordpress/2008/02/24/secondary-transmission-%EF%BB%BFthe-short-and-sweet-about-live-virus-vaccine-shedding/comment-page-1/ 

  Small Pox vaccine sheds to infant from parent (military personnel):   http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSN1744524120070518

  Everyone infected in this whooping cough outbreak was up to date onvaccinations:   http://fox13now.com/2015/03/27/19-kids-in-summit-co-diagnosed-with-whooping-cough-despite-being-up-to-date-on-vaccinations/ 

  & this outbreak too:   http://myfox8.com/2015/12/18/13-cases-of-whooping-cough-confirmed-in-davie-county-schools/ 

  Even the CDC suggests that the vaccinated are an asymptomatic reservoirfor infection:   http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/6/5/00-0512_article

  Mumps outbreak in Netherlands linked to those vaccinated with the MMRtwice:   http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/20/4/13-1681_article

  Pertussis outbreak in California -"Our unvaccinated & undervaccinated population did not appear tocontribute significantly to the increased rate of clinical pertussis.Surprisingly, the highest incidence of disease was among previouslyvaccinated children aged 8–12 years.":   http://m.cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/54/12/1730.long?view=long&pmid=22423127 

  Measles outbreak in a fully immunized population:   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3821823

  49% of children vaccinated STILL got pertussis:   https://www.cdc.gov/pertussis/downloads/pertuss-surv-report-2016-provisional.pdf 

  You may be surprised to learn that fully vaccinated children & adultscan still be infected, paralyzed & transmit polio. Here are two casesin particular that may grab your interest- 

 "Outbreak of paralytic poliomyelitis in Oman: evidence forwidespread transmission among fully vaccinated children" :   http://www.popline.org/node/315407#.dpuf

   "Oral polio vaccine-associated paralysis in achild despite previous immunization with inactivated vaccine." :   http://www.virology.ws/2014/10/08/oral-polio-vaccine-associated-paralysis-in-a-child-despite-previous-immunization-with-inactivated-virus/ 

  Mutant strains of polio vaccine now causing more paralysis than wildpolio:https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2017/06/28/534403083/mutant-strains-of-polio-vaccine-now-cause-more-paralysis-than-wild-polio 
   
Polio vaccine causing polio again:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/26/health/polio-papua-new-guinea-bn/index.html 
   
Polio vaccine contaminated with HFM virus:
Herd Immunity
   http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2012/02/18/the-deadly-impossibility-of-herd-immunity-through-vaccination-by-dr-russell-blaylock/
 
 The term, ‘herd immunity’, was coined by researcher, A W Hedrich,after he’d studied the epidemiology of measles in USA between 1900-1931.His study published in the May, 1933 American Journal of Epidemiologyconcluded that when 68% of children younger than 15 yrs old had becomeimmune to measles via infection, measles epidemics ceased. For severalreasons, this natural, pre-vaccine herd immunity differed greatly fromtoday’s vaccine ‘herd immunity’.1,2

 When immunity was derived from natural infection, a much smallerproportion of the population needed to become immune to show the herdeffect; compare the 68% measles immunity required for natural herdimmunity to the very high percentages of vaccine uptake deemed necessaryfor measles vaccine ‘herd immunity’. In his ‘Vaccine Safety Manual’, NeilZ Miller cites research which concluded increasing vaccine uptakenecessary for ‘herd immunity’ ranging from “70 to 80 percent of two yearolds in inner cities” in 1991 to “‘close to 100 percent coverage’…with avaccine that is 90 to 98 percent effective.” in 1997. Miller notes that,“When the measles vaccine was introduced in 1963, officials wereconfident that they could eradicate the disease by 1967.”

 Subsequently, new dates for eradication were pronounced as 1982, 2000 and2010. Meanwhile, “In 1990, after examining 320 scientific works fromaround the world, 180 European medical doctors concluded that ‘theeradication of measles…would today appear to be an unrealistic goal.’”And in 1984, Professor D. Levy of Johns Hopkins University had already“concluded that if current practices [of suppressing natural immunity]continue, by the year 2050 a large part of the population will be at riskand ‘there could in theory be over 25,000 fatal cases of measles in theU.S.A.’”

 Disease-conferred immunity usually lasted a lifetime. As each newgeneration of children contracted the infection, the immunity of thosepreviously infected was renewed due to their continual cyclicalre-exposure to the disease; except for newly-infected children and thefew individuals who’d never had the disease or been exposed to it, the‘herd immunity’ of the entire population was maintained at alltimes.

 Vaccine ‘herd immunity’ is hit-and-miss; outbreaks of disease sometimeserupt in those who follow recommended vaccine schedules. If they doactually “immunize”, vaccines provide only short-term immunity so, in anattempt to maintain ‘herd immunity’, health authorities hold ‘cattledrives’ to round up older members of the ‘herd’ for administration ofbooster shots. And on it goes, to the point that, now, it’s recommendedwe accept cradle-to-grave shots of vaccine against pertussis, a diseasewhich still persists after more than sixty years of widespread use of thevaccine.

 Russell Blaylock, MD remarks, “One of the grand lies of the vaccineprogram is the concept of “herd immunity”. In fact, vaccines for mostAmericans declined to non-protective levels within 5 to 10 years of thevaccines. This means that for the vast majority of Americans, as well asothers in the developed world, herd immunity doesn’t exist and hasn’t forover 60 years.”3

 In the pre-vaccine era, newborns could receive antibodies againstinfectious diseases from their mothers who had themselves been infectedas children and re-exposed to the diseases later in life. Today’s babiesborn to mothers who were vaccinated and never exposed to these diseasesdo not receive these antibodies. In direct contrast to fear mongeringdisease “facts” and ‘herd immunity’ theories related by Public Health,most of today’s babies are more vulnerable than babies of the pre-vaccineera.

 References:
 1. “Monthly estimates of the child population ‘susceptible’ to measles,1900-1931, Baltimore, Maryland”; A W Hedrich; American Journal ofEpidemiology; May 1933 – Oxford University Press.

 2. ‘Vaccine Safety Manual’ by Neil Z Miller; New Atlantean Press; 2008,2009; pg 152.

 3. Ibid; pgs 16-17.

   https://www.facebook.com/axshlexy/posts/10154130529699126

 "Q: Doesn't herd immunity protect mostpeople?

 A: Herd immunity (or community immunity) is asituation in which, through vaccination or prior illness, a sufficientproportion of a population is immune to an infectious disease, making itsspread from person to person unlikely. Even individuals not vaccinated(such as newborns and those with chronic illnesses) are typicallyprotected because the disease has little opportunity to spread withintheir community. Since pertussis spreads so easily, vaccine protectiondecreases over time, and acellular pertussis vaccines may not preventcolonization (carrying the bacteria in your body without getting sick) orspread of the bacteria, we can't rely on herd immunity to protect peoplefrom pertussis."< https://www.cdc.gov/pertussis/about/faqs.html#increasing >

 
 Questions to ask your doctor/ped regarding vaccinations:

 
 Question-1: If measles vaccines confer measles immunity, then why doalready-vaccinated children have anything to fear from a measlesoutbreak?

 Question-2: If vaccines work so well, then why did Merck virologists filea False Claims Act with the U.S. government, describing the astonishingscientific fraud of how Merck faked its vaccine results to trick theFDA?

 Question-3: If vaccines don’t have any links to autism, then why did atop CDC scientist openly confess to the CDC committing scientific fraudby selectively omitting clinical trial data after the fact in order toobscure an existing link between vaccines and autism?

 Question-4: If mercury is a neurotoxic chemical, then why is it stillbeing injected into children and pregnant women via vaccines? Why doesthe vaccine industry refuse to remove all the mercury from vaccines inthe interests of protecting children from mercury?

 Question-5: If vaccines are so incredibly safe, then why does the vaccineindustry need absolute legal immunity from all harm caused by itsproducts?

 Question-6: If vaccines work so well to prevent disease, then why do somevaccines (like the chickenpox vaccine) openly admit that they can causethe spread of chickenpox?

 Question-7: If vaccines are so great for public health, then why do thesehistorical public health charts show nearly all the declines ininfectious disease taking place BEFORE vaccines arrived on thescene?

 Question-8: If vaccines are perfectly safe, then why did at least 13people recently die in Italy after being vaccinated?

 Question-9: If vaccines are so trustworthy, then why did a pro-vaccinegroup in Africa recently discover ­ to its shock and horror ­ thatvaccines being given to young African women were secretly laced withabortion chemicals? 

 Question-10: If vaccines are backed by solid science, then why do somevaccine inserts openly admit they are backed by no clinicaltrials?

 Question-11: If vaccines are so safe, then why does this vaccine insertadmit that the Gardasil vaccine causes “acute respiratory illness” inbabies who consume the breast milk of mothers who have beenvaccinated?

 Question-12: If vaccines are so safe, then why does this Gardasil insertsheet admit that the vaccine causes “seizure-like activity, headache,fever, nausea and dizziness” and can even cause those injected with thevaccine to lose consciousness and fall, resulting in injury?

 Question-13: If vaccines are backed by so much “science” then why do theyfrequently admit there really aren’t any studies of the vaccine for thevery groups of people who are often injected with it?

 Question-14: If vaccines are so safe to give to pregnant women, then whydo the vaccine insert sheets openly admit most of them have never beentested for safety in pregnant women? In fact, this vaccine admits “theeffects of the vaccine in foetal development are unknown.”Question-15: Ifvaccines are so safe to be injected into the bodies of children andpregnant women, then why do their own insert sheets readily admit theyare manufactured with a cocktail of toxic chemical ingredients including“foetal bovine serum?” (The blood serum of aborted baby cows.)

 Question-16: If vaccines achieve absolute immunity, then why are as manyas 97 percent of children struck by infectious disease already vaccinatedagainst that disease?

 Question-17: If vaccines are totally safe and effective, then why didthis five-year-old girl recently die from the very strain of flu she wasjust vaccinated against?

 Question-18: If the mainstream media claims to report honest, unbiasedinformation about vaccines, then why was there a total nationwideblackout on the news of the CDC whistle-blower admitting vaccines arelinked to autism?

 
 Doctors who explain clearly why vaccines aren't safe or effective.
 1. Dr. Nancy Banks -  http://bit.ly/1Ip0aIm

 
 2. Dr. Russell Blaylock -  http://bit.ly/1BXxQZL

 
 3. Dr. Shiv Chopra -  http://bit.ly/1gdgh1s

 
 4. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny -  http://bit.ly/1MPVbjx

 
 5. Dr. Suzanne Humphries -  http://bit.ly/17sKDbf

 
 6. Dr. Larry Palevsky -  http://bit.ly/1LLEjf6

 
 7. Dr. Toni Bark -  http://bit.ly/1CYM9RB

 
 8. Dr. Andrew Wakefield -  http://bit.ly/1MuyNzo

 
 9. Dr. Meryl Nass -  http://bit.ly/1DGzJsc

 
 10. Dr. Raymond Obomsawin -  http://bit.ly/1G9ZXYl

 
 11. Dr. Ghislaine Lanctot -  http://bit.ly/1MrVeUL

 
 12. Dr. Robert Rowen -  http://bit.ly/1SIELeF

 
 13. Dr. David Ayoub -  http://bit.ly/1SIELve

 
 14. Dr. Boyd Haley PhD -  http://bit.ly/1KsdVby

 
 15. Dr. Rashid Buttar -  http://bit.ly/1gWOkL6

 
 16. Dr. Roby Mitchell -  http://bit.ly/1gdgEZU

 
 17. Dr. Ken Stoller -  http://bit.ly/1MPVqLI

 
 18. Dr. Mayer Eisenstein -  http://bit.ly/1LLEqHH

 
 19. Dr. Frank Engley, PhD -  http://bit.ly/1OHbLDI

 
 20. Dr. David Davis -  http://bit.ly/1gdgJwo

 
 21. Dr Tetyana Obukhanych -  http://bit.ly/16Z7k6J

 
 22. Dr. Harold E Buttram -  http://bit.ly/1Kru6Df

 
 23. Dr. Kelly Brogan -  http://bit.ly/1D31pfQ

 
 24. Dr. RC Tent -  http://bit.ly/1MPVwmu

 
 25. Dr. Rebecca Carley -  http://bit.ly/K49F4d

 
 26. Dr. Andrew Moulden -  http://bit.ly/1fwzKJu

 
 27. Dr. Jack Wolfson -  http://bit.ly/1wtPHRA

 
 28. Dr. Michael Elice -  http://bit.ly/1KsdpKA

 
 29. Dr. Terry Wahls -  http://bit.ly/1gWOBhd

 
 30. Dr. Stephanie Seneff -  http://bit.ly/1OtWxAY

 
 31. Dr. Paul Thomas -  http://bit.ly/1DpeXPf

 
 32. Many doctors talking at once -  http://bit.ly/1MPVHOv

 
 33. Dr. Richard Moskowitz -  http://bit.ly/1OtWG7D

 
 34. Dr. Jane Orient -  http://bit.ly/1MXX7pb

 
 35. Dr. Richard Deth -  http://bit.ly/1GQDL10

 
 36. Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic -  http://bit.ly/1eqiPr5

 
 37. Dr Chris Shaw -  http://bit.ly/1IlGiBp

 
 38. Dr. Susan McCreadie -  http://bit.ly/1CqqN83

 
 39. Dr. Mary Ann Block -  http://bit.ly/1OHcyUX

 
 40. Dr. David Brownstein -  http://bit.ly/1EaHl9A

 
 41. Dr. Jayne Donegan -  http://bit.ly/1wOk4Zz

 
 42. Dr. Troy Ross -  http://bit.ly/1IlGlNH

 
 43. Dr. Philip Incao -  http://bit.ly/1ghE7sS

 
 44. Dr. Joseph Mercola -  http://bit.ly/18dE38I

 
 45. Dr. Jeff Bradstreet -  http://bit.ly/1MaX0cC

 
 46. Dr. Robert Mendelson -  http://bit.ly/1JpAEQr

 
 47. Dr Theresa Deisher  https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=6Bc6WX33SuE
 
 
 48. Dr. SamEggertsen- https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8LB-3xkeDAE

 
 Hundreds more doctors testifying that vaccines aren't safe oreffective, in these documentaries....
 1. Vaccination - The Silent Epidemic -  http://bit.ly/1vvQJ2W

 
 2. The Greater Good -  http://bit.ly/1icxh8j

 
 3. Shots In The Dark -  http://bit.ly/1ObtC8h

 
 4. Vaccination The Hidden Truth -  http://bit.ly/KEYDUh

 
 5. Vaccine Nation -  http://bit.ly/1iKNvpU

 
 6. Vaccination - The Truth About Vaccines -  http://bit.ly/1vlpwvU

 
 7. Lethal Injection -  http://bit.ly/1URN7BJ

 
 8. Bought -  http://bit.ly/1M7YSlr

 
 9. Deadly Immunity -  http://bit.ly/1KUg64Z

 
 10. Autism - Made in the USA -  http://bit.ly/1J8WQN5

 
 11. Beyond Treason -  http://bit.ly/1B7kmvt

 
 12. Trace Amounts -  http://bit.ly/1vAH3Hv  

 
 13. Why We Don't Vaccinate -  http://bit.ly/1KbXhuf

https://scienceforthepeople.org/peoples-green-new-deal/

Help build our People’s Green New Deal campaign:
sign up today!
William Gropper, Construction of the Dam (study for mural, the Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C.), 1938, oil on canvas, Smithsonian American Art Museum, Transfer from the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1965.18.11A-C</font size>

 

Science for the People calls for a “People’s Green New Deal” to combat the climate crisis with widespread democratic input.

Watch this page, sign on, & follow us on social media for more details about this campaign – coming the week of April 1st.

Resources       Organizer/Partner Organization Form

Next organizing webinar:  Sunday, March 24, 2019

The call for a Green New Deal put forward by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez offers an opportunity to create transformative solutions to the interrelated crises of climate change, racism, xenophobia, and declining living standards for the majority.

Today, we have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to build a movement that can make this transformative vision a reality. We need you to sign up today to help us.

As the Green New Deal becomes part of the mainstream political discussion, there will be pressure to water it down, and to prioritize its most problematic elements over those that “require elected representatives to think outside of the normally accepted economic, social, industrial, and commercial parameters” (CJA).

The People’s Green New Deal campaign will fight to maintain the radical, popular promise at the heart of the GND proposal from Ocasio-Cortez and the Sunrise Movement and to strengthen the proposal through democratic input:

We promote solutions and struggles that educate, organize, mobilize, and directly empower working class people, Indigenous Peoples, historically oppressed communities, and migrants displaced by climate disaster, in their everyday lives.

We aim to collaborate with all of those who have developed the core ideas of the Green New Deal over the years and decades, particularly to ensure we understand the role of militarism in the climate crisis, and to fight for globally just solutions.

We stand with frontline communities demanding equitable solutions to the climate crisis, so that no member of our society will be forgotten or unjustly bear the costs of climate change.

We stand with trade unions demanding a Just Transition and the creation of millions of green jobs, so that all people may be able to support their families with dignity.

We call for a transformation of the economy which redistributes resources from those who led us into this crisis in the first place.

We will act to ensure the Green New Deal’s social, industrial, and economic transitions elevate the voices of workers, people of color, Indigenous Peoples, women, and migrants. We will lend our technical expertise to supporting solutions that are driven and controlled by these communities.

Addressing climate change is not only an urgent moral and ecological imperative. It is something that, if done right, can vastly improve the lives of millions, re-orient our society around values of solidarity, justice, and equality, and build a much more democratic world.

Join us today.

Sign this call for action & Get involved.

List of signatories:

Jamie Bemis, Science for the People NYC
Conor Dempsey, Science for the People NYC
David Hofmann, Science for the People Atlanta, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Rebecca Orrison, Science for the People Albany,  State University of New York
Zach Zill, Science for the People NYC
Amber Keller, Habitat for Humanity, Atlanta, GA
Sheila Rosenthal, West Lafayette, IN
JoEllen McBride, PhD, Science for the People Magazine, Downingtown, PA
Danielle Powers, Science for the People NYC, New York, NY
Lisette Torres-Gerald, Science for the People – POC Caucus, Lincoln, NE
Julia Greenberg, Sault Sainte Marie, MI
Ben Allen, Federal contractor, Knoxville, TN
Edna Bonhomme, Max Planck for History of Science, Berlin, Germany
Corey Knox, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Betty Tisel, Minneapolis, MN
Harvey Partica, Lewisburg, PA
Chelsea McCracken, Dixie State University, St. George, UT
fern MacDougal, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Karen Saunders, Western Mass Science for the People, Brattleboro, VT
Zoya Vallari, Caltech, Pasadena, CA
Geraldine MacKinnon, Univ. Professor, Santiago, Chile
Zhe Yu Lee, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, WI
Cruz Rodriguez, Janesville , WI
Christy Dolph, Science for the People – Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN
Andrew Butts, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Amy Donahue, Froedtert & the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Thea Riofrancos, DSA Ecosocialist Working Group/ Providence DSA, Providence, RI
Lauren Fleer, Philadelphia, PA
Daniel Parker, Jonesboro, AR
Rachel Meirs, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, Brooklyn, NY
Eduardo Remes, Science for the People, Brooklyn, NY
Laura Peñaranda, Science for the People NYC, CUNY, New York, NY
Nicholas Hart, Seattle, WA
Sherry J Wolf, International Socialist Organization, Brooklyn, NY
Roxanne R. Young, Austin, TX
John Kerin, Los Angeles, CA
Amy Muldoon, Communication Workers of America, Astoria, NY
Arani Roy, University of Minnesota, Roseville, MN
Daniel Adkins, Arlington, Va
John McGrath, Labour Party, London, UK
Victoria DiMassa, Worcester, MA
Bill Fletcher Jr, former president, TransAfrica Forum, Mitchellville, MD
Matteo Farinella, Columbia University, New York, NY
Aparna Raghu , Lynn, MA
Erik Wallenberg, Science for the People, Minneapolis, MN
Vicky Cannon, Lone Star College , Spring, TX
Avik Herur-Raman, Macalester College YDSA, St. Paul, MN
Michael Pisaro , CalArts, Valencia , CA
Elaine Loeffler, Finland, MN
Brian Ward, International Socialist Organization, Madison , MN
Katherine L Bryant, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Nederland
Jared Story, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Jen Sauer, Knoxville, TN
Dante O’Hara, University of California- Riverside
Soren Hough, Science for the People Magazine, University of Cambridge
Lilian Smith, Brooklyn, NY
Dave Robinson, Denver DSA
Noah Weaverdyck, Science for the People Ann Arbor
Elizabeth Bissell, Putney, VT
Laura Beth Pelner, Washington DC
Simone Godwin, Science for the People Knoxville, University of Tennessee
Andrew Foltz-Morrison, Science for the People NYC
Jonathan Weil, Science for the People NYC
Maggie Baisley, Whispering Pines, NC
Jacob Herbers, University of Minnesota, MN
Helen Zhao, Columbia University, NY
Phil Gasper, Madison Area Technical College, WI
Chris Dols, Science for the People, NY
Christopher Baum, International Socialist Organization, NY
Eric Ruder, Better Off Red Podcast, NY
Ashley Theissen, International Socialist Organization, KY
Joan McKiernan, Bronx, NY
Devon Armstrong, Milwaukee, WI
Lee Wengraf, Author of Extracting Profit, NY
Arielle Lawson, Hunter College, NY
Chris Manley, International Socialist Organization, NY
Cami Q, New York, NY
Greg Morin, Rochester, NY
Rick Sprout, Green Party, NY
Justice Smith, North Seattle Progressives, WA
Miran Božičević, Science for the People, NY
Jean Hricik, McDonough, NY
Nantina Vgontzas, GSOC-UAW 2110, NY
Tim LaRock, Northeastern University, MA
Mel Bienenfeld, President of Westchester Community College Federation of Teachers, NY
Jon Isaac, International Socialist Organization – Madison, WI
Michael Gasser, Science for the People, Santa Cruz California
Ben Silver, New York NY
Ansley Hobbs, CUNY School of Public Health, Brooklyn New York
Lisa Duggan, New York University, New York NY
Jonathan Gottlieb, International Socialist Organization, New York NY
Stephen Fernandez, Rowan University, NJ
Jonathan Weil, New York, NY
Amanda Champion, New York, NY
Nikki Crook, Families for Climate Action, Brooklyn, NY
Hala Iqbal, New York University, NY
Nathalie Gilet, New York, NY
Aya Charafeddine, New York University, NY
Lia Soorenian, Columbia University, NY
Jared Willard, University of Minnesota, MN
Sheila Rosenthal, West Lafayette, IN
Colleen Baublitz, Columbia University, NY
Frank Rosenthal, Purdue University, IN
Maggie Lee, University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN
Justin C Burton, Emory University, GA
Bernhard Altaner, Technical University of Munich, Germany
Alyce Santoro, Rhode Island School of Art and Design, RI
Sam Anderson, National Black Education Agenda, NY
Anthony Levenda, Arizona State University, AZ
Emily Hoffman, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, TN
Ahmed Hafezi, New York University, NY
Shejla Pollozi, Lehman College, The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, NY
Emma Harnisch, Science for the People – Western Massachusetts, MA
Arthur Borden-Heilman, Brooklyn, NY
Brian Ward, International Socialist Organization, WI
Daniel Casey Adkins, Democratic Socialists of America, VI
M. Elias Dueker, Bard College, NY
Zoe Grossman, Bright Power, NY
Zoe Kaufman, Brooklyn, NY
Rebecca Mason, University of San Francisco, CA
Andrea Guinn, Democratic Socialists of America, NY
Andrew McNamara, Bright Power, NY
Bill Bigelow, Rethinking Schools, OR
Pamela Parker, Parsons School of Design, NY
Connie Chow, University of Massachusetts Boston, MA



https://phys.org/news/2019-03-revamping-science-room-voices.html

Revamping science: Making room for more voices
 
March 12, 2019, Dartmouth College 
       Credit: CC0 Public Domain 
Science is known for being objective and apolitical, but is it? Historically speaking, the voices of underrepresented groups have been missing from science, resulting in an often incomplete and fragmented perspective of the world. Without these voices, we are left with skewed ideas about race, ethnicity, class, sex, gender, and sexuality, how these concepts get made, and how they affect people's lives. A new collection of essays published today in the Vital Topics Forum of American Anthropologist unpacks how increasingly diverse scientists speak back to these problems, by offering new and more complete understandings of human and nonhuman diversity. 
  
In these essays, scientists challenge us to move beyond thinking about race as innate and to consider its consequences, including how racism impacts people's bodies and lives. Others push against oversimplifications of sex, gender, and sexuality, highlighting how the complexities of human diversity have been erased. Scientists from diverse backgrounds also draw attention to the ways that their bodies and experiences shape access to science, and how barriers to participation limit the scope of scientific research.

Diversity in science is therefore about more than visibility and representation; it brings the opportunity to change science for the better. Changing who we are in science makes it possible to change what we know.

In 18 essays, 20 anthropologists from diverse sex, gender, class, racial, ethnic, and religious backgrounds reflect on who they are and how that informs their science. This Vital Topics Forum is co-edited by Deborah A. Bolnick, an associate professor of anthropology and member of the Institute of Systems Genomics at the University of Connecticut; Rick W. A. Smith, a postdoctoral fellow with the department of anthropology and the Neukom Institute for Computational Science at Dartmouth College; and Agustín Fuentes, Edmund P. Joyce C.S.C. Professor of Anthropology and chair of the department of anthropology at the University of Notre Dame. All three also contributed essays to the collection.

In their introduction to the series, Smith and Bolnick reflect on how science has always been a view from somewhere, and how "historically, biological anthropology has often reflected classist, patriarchal, heterosexist, white supremacist, and other settler colonial agendas."

"In this Vital Topics Forum, we question the ways that these agendas have shaped the practice of science and the framing of scientific knowledge, even as their influences have typically gone unrecognized," explains Bolnick.

"Marginalized people have always known that science is partial and political," notes Smith. "There's been this idea that 'real' science only includes a narrow set of perspectives about how the world works, but that's because access to science has long been denied to marginalized people. The resulting lack of diverse ideas in science isn't evidence of its neutrality, it is evidence of its exclusionism. Diversifying science brings with it the possibility of changing science itself."
  
"Science, including anthropology, has a long history of conducting research that has been deeply harmful and unethical," adds Bolnick. "Studies have sometimes been carried out without consent from the individuals and communities affected by the research, and science has often served to justify discrimination, racism, the displacement of Indigenous peoples from their ancestral homelands, and the enslavement, abuse, exploitation and oppression of marginalized peoples. Change is long overdue."

Recent studies have shown that more diverse research teams create higher quality outcomes. "This is not a conversation about identity politics but about shifting the narrative in science to better reflect who we are and how we make sense of the world around us. Diversity enhances the capacity of science to better understand the processes of the world. Including a broader array of histories and identities is essential, if we want to create the best quality science," says Fuentes.

This Vital Topics Forum grew out of a high-profile symposium at the 86th Annual American Association of Physical Anthropologists Meeting in 2017, during which researchers reflected on how historically marginalized scientists are reshaping the field of biological anthropology.

These pieces demonstrate the power of diversity to transform scientific knowledge in biological anthropology, providing a model for what is possible across other science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields.

"Diversity is not just about visibility and representation," concludes Smith. "It is also about making new and vital science together."