Print

Print


https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2019/07/26/nobel-prize-winner-discusses-his-lessons
A Nobelist's Life Lessons

Michael Kosterlitz explains physics to the nonspecialist.
By David Matthews for Times Higher Education
<https://www.insidehighered.com/users/david-matthews-times-higher-education>
July 26, 2019
4 Comments
<https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2019/07/26/nobel-prize-winner-discusses-his-lessons#disqus_thread>

Physicists who attempt to explain their work to the general public are
attempting an “almost impossible task,” according to a Nobel Prize winner,
because, like secondhand-car salesmen, their words “seem to make sense” but
may actually leave the public with little or no genuine understanding.

Michael Kosterlitz, who won the award in physics in 2016 for exploring
unusual matter phases at ultralow temperatures, told* Times Higher
Education* that, on the whole, any attempt to explain his work to the “man
or woman in the street” is “a waste of time.”

<https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/nobel-winner-explaining-physics-public-waste-time>In
physics, “every second word is a jargon word,” he said during an interview
at the 2019 Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting, an annual gathering of
prizewinners and young scientists in southern Germany held earlier this
month. “What you’re saying just doesn’t make sense to them, which is fair
enough.”

“People are attempting an almost impossible task,” he warned. “You’re
trying to explain something to people who don’t have any background at all
in these logical steps that are natural to, are part of, any scientist’s
psyche, [but] which are alien to most other people.”

He also likened it to “going to Korea, or China, and trying to communicate
without speaking any of the native language.”

Physicists still have to make the effort, Kosterlitz conceded, not least as
they receive public money. But, on the whole, they are doomed to have to
attempt something that is near impossible, he believed; attempts to explain
his work to his wife fall flat 99 percent of the time, he said.

“People do make an effort to put a set of words together that seem to mean
something,” Kosterlitz said. “In my opinion, it’s a bit of a con game”
(although he later backtracked, adding that this description might be a
“bit strong”).

Now 76, Kosterlitz, born in Aberdeen, Scotland, to refugees from Nazi
Germany, was not always destined for physics. Instead, he was channeled
into the field by a series of other limitations. “When I was at high school
and college, I quickly realized that my memory is so lousy that standard
subjects -- the humanities -- I couldn’t cope with because there was too
much memory involved; therefore maths and sciences were the only
possibility,” he told *Times Higher Education*.

Chemistry was also out. Kosterlitz is colorblind -- he found it impossible
to distinguish between different shades of red in test tubes. He also
seemed to attract danger in the chemistry lab, forcing evacuations by
mixing together mystery chemicals that produced noxious gases, and once
being blasted in the face by shards of glass from an exploding test tube.

As a natural sciences undergraduate at the University of Cambridge,
Kosterlitz discovered a talent for rock climbing, and he sees parallels
between scaling a cliff face and tackling a physics problem. “You’re
stepping out into unknown territory, nothing to guide you, and you rely on
your own skill,” he said. But the comparison only goes so far: the penalty
for failure in physics is not death, he noted.

He even considered quitting physics altogether to become a professional
climber, only to be dissuaded by his wife and father.

This turned out to be a lucky choice, as Kosterlitz put it, because a few
years later he was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, ending his climbing
career entirely.

“My wife always says, ‘Actually, you know, Mike, I’m pretty pleased you’ve
got MS, because otherwise you’d probably be dead by now.’ She’s probably
right,” he said, breaking into laughter.

Earlier at Lindau, Kosterlitz told a room full of young scientists that
winning a Nobel prize is 95 percent luck. “I followed this incredibly
random, tortuous path where basically it was completely unplanned,” he
told *Times
Higher Education*.

The one downside to winning is that “I’m now expected to offer words of
wisdom on all sorts of subjects, many of which I know absolutely nothing
about,” he warned.

Shortly after winning the prize, Kosterlitz, who spent the bulk of his
tenured career at the University of Birmingham and Brown University,
described Brexit as the “stupidest thing I’ve heard of” during an interview
with a journalist. “I just started getting hate emails,” he recalled. “That
made me realize that people take what I say seriously.”

“Look, I may have won the Nobel Prize in physics, but, except for that, I’m
still the same idiot I was six years ago, so why do you take me seriously
now?” he said, with another laugh.