Received: from smtp0.mindspring.com (smtp0.mindspring.com [207.69.200.30]) by toucan.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA00147 for <[log in to unmask]>; Fri, 14 May 1999 01:38:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from default (user-38lcb5s.dialup.mindspring.com [209.86.44.188]) by smtp0.mindspring.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA11690; Fri, 14 May 1999 04:37:56 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]> X-Sender: [log in to unmask] X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 04:38:12 -0400 To: [log in to unmask] From: yemi toure <[log in to unmask]> Subject: The Internet in Africa - What Now? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ********************4warded message*************** X-Sender: [log in to unmask] X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0.1 Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 14:39:27 -0700 To: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask] From: Jamal Ali <[log in to unmask]> Subject: FWD: [GKD] Longterm loans for ICT investments in Africa : : an fyi......any comments, thoughts, etc.? please respond to the person & address at the end....however, feel free to get back 2 me with any salient comments u would like 2 discuss... Jamal/Khepera ********************4warded message*************** Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 15:19:11 -0800 Hello all, I am hoping that indigenous pioneers from within Africa and International players working on the development of the Internet in Africa might comment on this statement from their respective view points. A closer observation of the development trend of Africa's Internet Infrastructure and Internet Service Provision suggests that Sub-Saharan African countries (except South Africa) are building only IP connections and not IP networks. Is this a gross oversight on the part of the indigenous pioneers and International players or has sub-Saharan Africa approached its organizational and technical limitations based on existing institutions and telecommunication infrastructure ? With only IP connections, sub-Saharan Africa's contribution to the Internet (links, content, infrastructure, applications, policy) will remain on the periphery. The digital age will remain a remote phenomenon for African public if the indigenous ICT players resign themselves to IP connections and do not press on to build IP networks. In some African countries, it can be justified to conceive brand new IP networks (gateway and backbones) separate from but strategically linked to the International telephone exchange and Public telephone networks. There is room for further development of Africa's national, regional continent-wide Internet Institutions. Interestingly, history appears to be repeating itself once again. Africa has yet to fulfill the dream of a continent-wide satellite system, envisaged over some 12 years ago, to support direct intra-contintental telecommunications traffic. One of the technical reasons for this system was the limited foot prints of the Intelsat satellites on the continent. This required telecommunications traffic between African countries to be routed through hubs in Europe and based on former colonial alliances. If the hypothesis is true that there is a direct relation between telecommunications development and economic and political well being of a country then, failure by African countries to evolve robust national networks and fully implement regional telecommunications (Panaftel) and the intra-continental network (Rascom) partly explains Africa's current economic and political status. Africa's contribution to the Internet within the next five years will have a direct relationship to its advantage and disadvantages in the Global Information Society. Some African countries should work to plan and develop IP networks instead of just retro-fitting the telecommunications network. Organizational and technical challenges in developing Africa's Internet Infrastructure and Service Provision must be overcome. It is not an option. It is a must for an equitable position in the Global Information Society. Perhaps it is time to consider long-term loans to support the development of national and regional IP networks much like the ones provided to develop Public networks and International Satellite connections. The debt and credit worthiness of some African countries comes into question but the hard truth is "Without the financial resources or the technological infrastructure to influence any sphere of global relations, Africa south of the Sahara seems rooted at the periphery of marginalization" An even closer observation shows that the international development community (in the last five years) has supported all the short term investments to demonstrate the potential of the technology in almost every sector and geographical terrain. The prevailing school of thought has been to leave long-term solutions and investment to the private sector. Perhaps it is time the International Development Community certify Africa once again for long-term loans and for ICT infrastructure investments in Africa given the demonstrated potential of the technology in Africa. It is the logical next step. Adrian Q. Labor Technical Advisor Unganisha (Connectivity) Project, Programs Branch International Development Research Centre Mailing address: PO Box 8500, Ottawa, Canada KIG 3H9 Office address: Rm 1247, 250 Albert Street, Ottawa, Canada, KIP 6M1 Tel: (613) 236 6163 Ex 2284 Fax: (613) 567 7748 Email: [log in to unmask] Web: <http://www.idrc.ca/unganisha> ****************************************************************** "We are the digital drummers of the technical ether, counteracting the inherent arrhythmia and harmonizing the fundamental discordance which is the wilderness West. As soldiers, shoulder to shoulder, mind to mind, I & I be warriors, our weapons lightning & the music of thunder." jamal ali copyright 18 march 1991