Here is some follow-up correspondence (with a couple of clarifying
that I had recently about the road rage incident and unresponsive
"Peter K. Duval" wrote:
> (My correspondent) wrote:
> > Peter,
> > thanks for your advice. It really pisses me off that I do everything
> > right and this cop wants to hold me responsible, while Mr. A..H... Surburban
> > driver suffers from road rage. Isn't there road rage laws in this State?
> Within the last year, a representative of the troopers' union came speak
> with the GMBC advocacy committee. I recall that this question came up.
> I think he said that the Careless & Negligent driving statute was the
> closest thing to a road rage law. He was not optimistic that it could
> be used effectively against road rage.
> I can see how it would be difficult to write and enforce a general road
> rage law. The incidents that I know about leave little evidence, are
> usually anonymous, and hinge a lot on intent.
> I do think that it would be effective to vigorously enforce existing
> rules of the road and speed limits. Speeding is the "gateway" behavior
> that breeds road rage. Stop light cameras and photo-radar systems,
> liberally deployed, would go a long toward taming traffic -- and have a
> beneficial side-effect of reducing sprawl by increasing and stabilizing
> apparent travel time. Drivers' knowledge that they are always at risk
> of being automatically fined for running red lights and speeding seems
> like it would be a powerful influence on their behavior.
> >From the discussion at the GMBC advocacy committee, it was clear that
> the troopers would be opposed to automated enforcement -- I think for
> two reasons:
> 1) It appears to threaten their jobs. Why hire a trooper when you can
> rent an inexpensive machine that writes tickets ten times faster and
> works around the clock, 365 days of the year, and virtually guarantees
> conviction by providing photographic documentation of the infraction?
> 2) More importantly, troopers need to have a reason for stopping
> suspicious vehicles. I think they like the situation where all vehicles
> are speeding. They can legally stop any vehicle without having to
> worry about justification.
> > Why don't we get the respect we deserve? Why am I wrong just because
> > I ride a bicycle?
> I think you can lay a lot of the blame on the advertising fueled car
> culture. If a biking and walking 'industry' could afford a $5
> billion/year ad budget, I think we would be living in a dramatically
> different world.
> > I eventualy called the troop leader in Rockingham and told him of my situation.
> > I refused to to him the Idiot Trooper's name out of fear that the Trooper
> > would haunt me and make my life miserable. The troop leader said he would
> > address bicycles, road rage, and the two abreast law in the monthly meeting
> > this week. He told me that he would pay attention to who squirmed as
> > he talked about it and talk to the offending Trooper afterwords. I ask
> > him not to for same reason posted above.
> Perhaps that's a good strategy. I think it would be nice to let
> supervisors know which troopers have good knowledge and judgement... and
> which ones don't.
> I get the feeling that, as an institution, the state police are regarded
> as having relatively high integrity. That you would have a fear of
> retribution should be strong cause for concern at the highest levels of
> administration. At the very least, this is a serious image problem for
> the state police.
> Consider following up with the troop leader (Is that the real title?) in
> a week to find out what actually happened.
> P.S.: Again, I plan to anonymize and repost this message.
Peter K. Duval +1 802 899 1132
98 Sleepy Hollow Road fax: 899 2430
Essex Junction, VT 05452-2798 [log in to unmask]
USA (from home) www.uvm.edu/~pduval
VTBIKEPEDPOLICY-L: The Vermont Bicycle and Pedestrian Policy Discussion List
Subscription control: http://list.uvm.edu/archives/vtbikepedpolicy-l.html.
For help: email [log in to unmask] with the word "help" in the message body.