LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for VTBIKEPEDPOLICY-L Archives


VTBIKEPEDPOLICY-L Archives

VTBIKEPEDPOLICY-L Archives


VTBIKEPEDPOLICY-L@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

VTBIKEPEDPOLICY-L Home

VTBIKEPEDPOLICY-L Home

VTBIKEPEDPOLICY-L  September 2002

VTBIKEPEDPOLICY-L September 2002

Subject:

Re: Riding two abreast

From:

[log in to unmask]

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Sun, 29 Sep 2002 19:06:34 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (97 lines)

Believe Bud has hit it on the head--up to perhaps 35 mph, riding in the "tire wipe"
for one rider or the lane with two bicycles together can work--higher speeds are
problematic for all concerned.


On 22 Sep 2002 at 13:30, Bud Haas wrote:

I'd like to add a few comments. I agree with Bunky's letter, and Len's and Dale's
comments.
Len suggests that it is safer, at this point in time, to ride in single file. He also sees
this as a positive political position.

Often there is no shoulder.
The Problem is not about riding two abreast.
The Problem is motorists refusing to slow down.

If I am riding with another two abreast, and a motorist approaches, and I drop
behind and both cyclists continue riding in line in the lane, the motorist will have to
cross the centerline to safely pass. If we continue to ride two abreast, the motorist
will still have to cross the centerline to safely pass. A motorist can only pass safely
in his travel lane if both cyclists get off the road into the shoulder, if there is one.

In the inline scenario, the motorist may choose to squeeze the cylists, slowing or
not, by passing in the same lane. In the abreast scenario, the motorist has to cross
the centerline, slowing and waiting if there is oncoming traffic. Of course, as we
know, many motorists do not slow, but willy-nilly cross the centerline oblivious to
any oncoming traffic, often driving them off the road.

It has been my experience that if I am riding in the lane, most motorists will cross
the centerline to pass; if I am on or near the fog line, or the shoulder, they will pass,
less safely, in my lane.

Which is safer for the cyclist? Causing a motorist to slow and more safely pass, or
allowing a motorist to unsafely pass in the same lane? One answer is that it
depends. Depends on the traffic, and the speed of the traffic. When should a cyclist
give up their right to the road? Does giving up that right help to educate motorists?
How do we get motorists to slow down? Do we really gain respect from motorists by
getting out of their way? Is having tthe "impede" word in the statute a help or a
hindrance in training motorists?

Bud

***********************************************
Dale and Lem wrote:
Len: In my experience, which includes riding with many groups of every size up to
hundreds, it depends on how it is done.

  - Riding two abreast can be done safely in the right situation.

  - There are many situations where it is not safe.

  - There are also situations where taking the whole lane may be safer than riding
single file. One example is making a left turn at a busy intersection with stop lights.

What is needed is some good education for people who lead and ride in groups.

Dale Critchlow

At 02:34 PM 9/20/02 -0400, Len Lamoureux wrote:


  Dear All, I want to express my thoughts on bikers riding two abreast on roads even
though I am probably in a minority with this group. I don t believe that the law is that
clear on the subject. Two bikers riding together on most Vermont roads, in a travel
lane with no shoulder or one biker in a lane and one on a narrow shoulder are
impeding in some way or other the flow of traffic by their very presence at a
relatively slow speed. There is no reason to ride side by side except to socialize.
That is not good enough even if the law may allow it. Think of a 24 pound bike out
there against a 4000 pound vehicle just because the bikers want to socialize and
believe they have the law on there side. Who loses if a biker is hurt by the vehicle?
The biker gets injured and he or she probably will not win in court or with the media
because the opposing attorney or someone else will try to make a case that the
bikers were impeding the flow of traffic. Also, bikers riding side by side really upset
most motorists and every time that happens it hurts our yearning for respect from
motorist. I have participated in many group rides and understand that in those
activities there will be riders together for some distance but then in a few miles they
become spaced out in more or less a single line. Also, it is fine for bikers to ride
together when there is an 8' to 12' wide shoulder along the travel way which is not
very often on Vermont roads. Please believe that I mean no disrespect to bikers. I
am as much a devoted avid biker as anyone in our group but I do feel strongly that
bikers should not be riding side by side on most Vermont roads. We have come far
in the last ten years but we still have a long ways to go to gain the respect and
acceptance we all desire. Len




Tony Redington
802-223-1744 (h)
[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask] (office)

==========
VTBIKEPEDPOLICY-L: The Vermont Bicycle and Pedestrian Policy Discussion List
Subscription control: http://list.uvm.edu/archives/vtbikepedpolicy-l.html.
For help: email [log in to unmask] with the word "help" in the message body.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
May 2012
March 2012
January 2012
March 2011
February 2011
October 2010
September 2010
July 2010
April 2010
March 2010
December 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
October 2008
May 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007
September 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
June 2006
May 2006
December 2005
November 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager