LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for VTBIKEPEDPOLICY-L Archives


VTBIKEPEDPOLICY-L Archives

VTBIKEPEDPOLICY-L Archives


VTBIKEPEDPOLICY-L@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

VTBIKEPEDPOLICY-L Home

VTBIKEPEDPOLICY-L Home

VTBIKEPEDPOLICY-L  October 2003

VTBIKEPEDPOLICY-L October 2003

Subject:

Segway news

From:

Bud Haas <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Bud Haas <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 15 Oct 2003 04:54:38 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (140 lines)

Published on Monday, October 13, 2003 by the Seattle
Times
The Segway is Just Another Lard-making Device
by Neal Peirce

Faced with an embarrassing factory recall of all the
6,000 high-tech scooters it has sold so far, the
Manchester, N.H., manufacturer Segway LLC may face a
slowdown in its lobbying blitz aimed at legalizing its
"human trans-porters" on all the sidewalks of all
America's states and communities.

The recall alert notes the danger of riders falling
off scooters when they try to speed up abruptly when
the unit's batteries are mostly depleted.

There's no doubt inventor Dean Kamen produced a modern
wonder with the "dynamic stabilization" technology
that lets the Segway move forward or halt, using five
gyroscopes and two tilt sensors to gauge a rider's
center of gravity measured about 100 times a second.

Take a mental leap and imagine specially reserved
lanes criss-crossing our cities that permit not just
Segway riders but also bicyclists to zip along quietly
at up to 12 miles per hour, bypassing stalled auto
traffic, reducing pollution and congestion.

Sadly, Kamen's firm had no idea of waiting for special
lanes for its invention, and certainly no inclination
to collaborate with bicycling groups. It wanted clear
access to a nation of sidewalks, immediately. So it
launched a high-intensity blitz aimed at the 50 state
legislatures, hiring influential lobbyists and wowing
legislators with demonstrations of its zippy new
machines.

The effort, begun less than two years ago, has been
phenomenally successful  permissive laws in 41
states. Most of these statutes say nothing about
minimum age of operators, tests, safety helmets or
other precautions. Some do allow localities to take
exception: San Francisco, banning Segways from
sidewalks last January, was the first. Officials,
especially in older cities with narrower sidewalks,
are leery about collisions between Segways and
pedestrians.

As well they might be. Legislatures may be mesmerized
into revoking the normal laws that bar motorized
vehicles from sidewalks, notes a leading safety
critic, Gary Smith, director of the Center for Injury
Research and Policy at Children's Hospital in
Columbus, Ohio.

But what legislators can't do, Smith notes, is "repeal
the laws of Newtonian physics." The Segway involves a
rider standing on a platform, with a high center of
gravity, not seated, no restraint system, clipping
along fairly rapidly. In rough terms, it is the SUV of
the sidewalks. Give it a major bump or swerve, says
Smith, and physical law dictates the driver will stay
in motion  and may impact anything in his path.
Segway's manufacturer, charges Smith, has released
zero data on the stopping distance or dynamic
stability of its scooters.

"The Segway," he continues, "is a motorized vehicle,
no matter whether it stops by friction brakes or
reverse torque, or whether it accelerates by use of a
throttle or tilt sensors." It's similar, he insists,
to motorized bikes, prohibited from sidewalks almost
everywhere. A child darting where he or she is not
expected, or a senior citizen unable to get out of the
way, could be severely injured. Why should the $5,000
Segway be allowed to impair common people's safety on
sidewalks that are designed for pedestrians to move,
talk, stand and enjoy their communities?

In rebuttal, Segways have potentially significant uses
 to move about in large warehouses and factories, for
example, or by local police or the military. They
could put public transit stops within reach of more
people, and provide alternatives to autos for short
errands.

Yet for most people, bikes could do the same. Which
raises the Segway's other inherent problem: more
motorization in a nation already overly motorized. The
gut problem, writes the San Francisco Weekly: "Lard.
Buckets of lard. Fat, rosy cheeks. Ample alabaster
bellies. Arms that flap, legs that waddle, bodies by
the millions shaking like bowls of jelly." Why, the
paper asks, introduce "a high-technology lard-making
device just at the moment when America is suffocating
from obesity?"

That's pretty harsh  and so far only a few thousand
Segways, way below company hopes and expectations,
have been sold anyway. But it does remind me of my
favorite slogan, discovered on the sign for the Onion
River Sports shop in Montpelier, Vt. The three words
speak volumes:

"Muscles Not Motors."

For elderly folk, there is a terrific substitute when
unaided walking becomes too onerous. It's the
30-year-old, Swedish-made "rollator," a compact
four-rubber-tired contraption to push (and lean on as
required). It has some grocery cart space and a
built-in bench. There is no motor. Tests prove that
use of the rollator prolongs mobility, independence
and agility and cuts down on hip fractures and other
bone-related perils of old age.

For able-bodied people, combined bike and Segway paths
make eminent sense because paths that work for one
will work for the other. Instead of claiming
miraculous invention and romancing politicos for
sidewalk access, the Segway folks would do well to sit
down with advocates of the humble bicycle for talks on
expanding the special city and rural pathways so
abundant in Europe but so sorely lacking here.

Copyright  2003 Seattle Times Company




__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com

==========
VTBIKEPEDPOLICY-L: The Vermont Bicycle and Pedestrian Policy Discussion List
Subscription control: http://list.uvm.edu/archives/vtbikepedpolicy-l.html.
For help: email [log in to unmask] with the word "help" in the message body.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
May 2012
March 2012
January 2012
March 2011
February 2011
October 2010
September 2010
July 2010
April 2010
March 2010
December 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
October 2008
May 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007
September 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
June 2006
May 2006
December 2005
November 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager