Test-driving Apple's stripped-down $99 iPod
Walter S. Mossberg
Wall Street Journal
Jan. 12, 2005 11:15 AM
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0112wsj-mossberg12-ON.html
At last week's Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, numerous
companies were showing off gadgets aimed at dethroning the most
successful electronics product of the past couple of years: Apple
Computer's iPod portable digital music player. Many hoped to challenge
Apple by offering smaller, lighter and less costly players than the
company's lowest priced and littlest iPod model, the $249 iPod Mini.
But Tuesday, at the annual MacWorld exposition in San Francisco, Apple
rolled out a new addition to the iPod line that will make that task
much harder. It's a tiny $99 music player called the iPod Shuffle that
Apple hopes will tempt millions of lower-budget music fans to join the
iPod legions when it hits store shelves later this month.
The new iPod model, which looks like a white pack of chewing gum, holds
just a fraction of the songs the larger iPods can store. And it doesn't
have a screen to tell you what song is playing or to allow you to
navigate to a particular track. But Apple is trying to make a virtue of
those limitations by promoting the new player as a way to carry a
frequently changed selection of tunes you know well and to play them in
random, or "shuffle" mode - hence the product's name.
advertisement
I've been testing the new iPod Shuffle for a couple of days, and, in my
tests, it fulfilled - and even exceeded - Apple's claims for
convenience, battery life and song capacity. Sound quality is so good
you can barely believe the music is coming from something so small.
To get to the magic $99 price, which undercuts its major competitors,
Apple has had to strip down this model so severely that it barely
resembles a traditional iPod. The Shuffle lacks the iPod's two most
distinctive physical features - the screen and the famous iPod scroll
wheel. The only features that mark the Shuffle as an iPod are the Apple
logo and iPod name on the back, and the familiar white iPod ear buds.
So the question is whether consumers will consider it a "real" iPod.
But Apple believes the low price, and its formidable marketing muscle,
could well make this model another iPod hit, especially with kids and
their parents for whom $249 was too much to pay.
You control the player using a five-way button pad that is circular in
layout, but doesn't turn or scroll. It contains a big round play/pause
button surrounded by smaller buttons for going to the next and previous
track, and adjusting volume up and down. Various colored lights tell
you whether the device is on play or pause, and the status of the
battery.
Like the bigger iPods, the new model works with Apple's excellent
iTunes software and the iTunes Music Store. A new "Autofill" feature in
iTunes loads up the iPod Shuffle with exactly the right amount of
music, randomly - though you can also manually select the songs to be
loaded.
The Shuffle uses cheaper, lower-capacity "flash" memory chips to store
the music, instead of the small hard disk drives used by the other
iPods. This puts it in direct competition with scores of other
so-called flash players. But, belying its high-priced reputation, Apple
has actually undercut the market.
The $99 iPod Shuffle comes with 512 megabytes of memory, which Apple
estimates can hold 120 songs. Its price is well below what other
name-brand flash music players with 512 megabytes cost. Models from
Creative Labs, iRiver, SanDisk, Philips and others cost from $120 to
$200 - though all have screens and some other features the iPod Shuffle
lacks.
A $149 model of the new iPod will also be available with twice the
memory, or one gigabyte, which has an estimated capacity of 240 songs.
That is also well below the price of competing players. Both models are
also smaller than most other flash players, and both have rechargeable
batteries, instead of the disposable ones most flash players use; the
cost of disposable batteries can add up over time.
In my tests, the iPod Shuffle performed well, exceeding Apple's claims.
Apple puts the new player's battery life at 12 hours on a single
charge. But, in my testing, it did much better than that, lasting 15
hours and 44 minutes.
Similarly, I found that the iPod Shuffle could hold many more songs
than Apple claims. By choosing manual mode to load the player, I was
able to cram up to 188 songs onto my 512-megabyte test model, rather
than the 120 Apple claims, without reducing the audio quality of the
songs. That's because Apple's calculation is based on four-minute
songs, but many pop and rock tunes, especially those from the '60s and
'70s, are actually much shorter than that.
Even when I used the random Autofill mode to load my test player, I
always got 130 to 150 songs, mainly because my library skews heavily
toward artists like the Beatles, Beach Boys, James Taylor and Motown
artists, whose songs rarely last four minutes.
If you have any room left over after loading your songs, you can use
the Shuffle to store other files.
Like some other flash players, the new iPod doesn't require a cable to
connect to a computer. Pulling a small white cap off the end reveals a
built-in USB connector which plugs right into a computer. Unlike most
flash players, however, this same USB connector recharges the iPod
Shuffle, from the computer. The player doesn't come with a wall
charger, though one will be available as a $29 extra.
A simple three-way switch on the back turns the new iPod off, or puts
it into the default shuffle mode, which plays its contents randomly, or
into a linear mode where the songs are played in order.
In addition to the wall charger, Apple will offer four other $29
accessories for the iPod Shuffle: an armband; a clear plastic case; a
snap-on battery pack for extra playing time; and a desktop dock that
attaches to the iPod Shuffle.
A sixth accessory, a white lanyard that snaps onto the iPod Shuffle so
it can be hung around the neck, comes free in the box.
I can understand the allure of shuffle play, and of carrying around
just a subset of your music. I most frequently use my larger iPods on
Shuffle mode. And, like most people, I play favorite songs more often
than others, even though my whole music collection is loaded on my
bigger iPod.
But, the lack of a screen on the Shuffle would bug me, personally. I
really enjoy seeing the song information while I play music. It's one
of the big advantages digital music players have over playing CDs. Of
course, joggers and others who listen to music while they work out
won't miss the screen, because they are rarely in a position to watch
it, and the fact that the Shuffle is small and lacks a delicate hard
disk will make exercising with it appealing.
There are a few design downsides to the iPod Shuffle. The lack of a
screen means you can't use playlists of collected songs on it, because
you have no way to select such a list. For many people, play lists are
a key part of the iPod experience.
The Shuffle also lacks many of the extra features of the bigger iPods,
such as various equalization settings for music playback, and the
ability to display calendar and contact information.
And I found the three-way mode button on the back difficult to move. I
was forced to press it so tightly that I often tripped the playback
controls on the other side.
Still, this is a good product that will enlarge the iPod's appeal,
especially with kids, people on low budgets, or people who work out. I
imagine some existing iPod owners will also buy Shuffles as sort of
add-on players. And the iPod juggernaut will roll on.
|