LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for VTCLIMMET Archives


VTCLIMMET Archives

VTCLIMMET Archives


VTCLIMMET@LIST.UVM.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

VTCLIMMET Home

VTCLIMMET Home

VTCLIMMET  April 1998

VTCLIMMET April 1998

Subject:

USGS: Water Quality in White River Basin Affected by Urban and Agricultural Activities (fwd)

From:

Lesley-Ann Dupigny-Giroux <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Climate & Meterology in Vermont <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 14 Apr 1998 14:11:09 -0400

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (125 lines)

Hello

I thought this might be of interest to the group.


LA

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 15:09:25 -0400
From: Trudy Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: USGS: Water Quality  in  White  River  Basin  Affected  by Urban  and  Agricultural  Activities

News Release

Contact:  Charlie Crawford, 317-290-3333x176

For release:  April 8, 1998

Water Quality  in  Indiana's White  River  Basin  Affected  by Urban  and
Agricultural  Activities

Water quality in the White River Basin is impacted by urban and
agricultural activities, according to the results of a five-year
investigation by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Department of the
Interior.

A variety of pesticides used for agricultural or urban uses were commonly
found in streams throughout the White River Basin. In contrast, only a
few pesticides were found in ground water, and these were at much lower
concentrations. Pesticide concentrations in streams in the White River
Basin were among the highest found at USGS monitoring stations nationwide.

Twenty-five different pesticides or pesticide degradation products were
found in at least 5 percent of samples near the mouth of the White River.
The widely used agricultural herbicides atrazine and metolachlor were
always found. "In a few samples, concentrations of the herbicides
atrazine, alachlor, or cyanazine exceeded Federal drinking-water
standards or advisories; however, annual average concentrations of each
of these compounds in the White River were below their respective
standard or guideline," said USGS hydrologist Charles G. Crawford,
project leader of the White River Basin study.

Fourteen different pesticides were found in a network of 94 shallow
monitoring wells; six were found more than once. However, Crawford said,
"No pesticide concentration found in ground water came close to exceeding
a Federal drinking-water standard or advisory." In cropland areas with a
surficial sand and gravel aquifer that is particularly vulnerable to
contamination but is also an important source of drinking water for
residents of the basin, atrazine compounds were found in two-thirds of
monitoring wells but only at trace levels. Shallow wells are most
susceptible to contamination and provide insight into the effects of
pesticides and fertilizers on ground-water quality. Pesticide
concentrations typically decrease with depth in an aquifer. The presence
of only low pesticide concentrations in shallow wells indicates they are
probably not present in the deeper ground water used most commonly for
domestic or public supply.

Most, but not all, of the pesticides found were associated with
agricultural use. Pesticide concentrations in streams differ according to
land use. Crawford said that lawn insecticides (such as diazinon) are
commonly found in streams in urban areas, whereas corn herbicides (such
as atrazine) are more commonly found in streams in agricultural areas.
Pesticide concentrations in streams are highest in areas with permeable,
well-drained soils, all other factors being equal. Agricultural tile
drains play a major role in transporting pesticides to streams in areas
with poorly drained soils. Nitrate concentrations in ground water are low
(commonly not found) in some aquifer settings and high (sometimes
exceeding the Federal drinking-water standard) in others. Nitrate
concentrations in stream water typically are between these extremes.
Median concentrations of nitrate at monitoring sites in streams generally
ranged from 2 to 6 milligrams per liter-higher than those at most other
USGS monitoring sites in the United States.

Soil drainage is a major factor controlling nitrate concentrations in
streams. "Concentrations tend to increase as the proportion of naturally
or artificially drained soils in the basin increases," said Crawford.
"Manure from farm animals also increases nitrate concentrations in some
streams." Nitrate concentrations in stream water rarely exceeded the
Federal drinking-water standard of 10 milligrams per liter.

Surficial sand and gravel aquifers underlying cropland had high nitrate
concentrations. Samples from 17 percent of shallow monitoring wells in
this setting exceeded the Federal drinking-water standard. However,
deeper wells (25 to 50 feet below the water table) in these unconfined
aquifers typically had little or no detectable nitrate. In many parts of
the basin, nitrate concentrations in ground water were low. For example,
sand and gravel aquifers protected by overlying clay typically had low
concentrations of nitrate. Such aquifers are present in more than half
the basin and are a common source of water for rural domestic users.

Runoff from urban areas degrades the quality of streams and ground water.
"Concentrations of trace metals and organic compounds in streambed
sediments tended to be above background concentrations in urban areas,
particularly Indianapolis," said Crawford. "Concentrations are generally
not a human-health concern; however, fish-consumption advisories for
PCB's and mercury are in effect for some locations in the basin." Several
chemicals whose use has long been banned (chlordane, dieldrin, and PCB's)
persist in streambed sediments and are concentrated in organisms such as
freshwater clams.

Fish communities have significantly improved since the early 1970's,
although degraded communities of fish still are found in streams with
poor water quality. Some streams with good fish habitat presently have
degraded communities of fish, a disparity indicating nonhabitat stresses
(such as poor water quality). In areas where the fish communities are
poorer than expected on the basis of fish habitat present, nutrient and
pesticide concentrations are high.

The White River Basin study is one of more than 50 studies across the
nation being done by the U.S. Geological Survey as part of its National
Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program. Through the NAWQA Program, the
USGS provides policymakers and citizens with information about current
conditions and trends in water quality and an assessment of the factors
that affect water quality across the United States.

The report, "Water Quality in the White River Basin, Indiana, 1992-1996,"
by Joseph M. Fenelon is published as U.S. Geological Survey Circular
1150. Copies of the report are available free of charge from the USGS
Indiana District Office, 5957 Lakeside Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN 46278,
(317) 290-3333 or the USGS Branch of Information Services, Box 25286,
Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225, (303) 202-4700 [fax requests to
(303) 202-4693; an order form is available at URL:
http://www-nmd.usgs.gov/esic/to_order.html].

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2022
May 2022
January 2022
December 2021
August 2021
July 2021
May 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
July 2020
November 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
July 2017
January 2017
September 2016
July 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
June 2015
April 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
November 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
February 2007
January 2007
October 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2005
July 2003
June 2003
March 2003
February 2003
October 2002
March 2002
November 2001
October 2001
August 2001
June 2001
October 2000
April 2000
February 2000
January 2000
October 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
January 1999
October 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UVM.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager